1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 27 10:43:14 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4A616F03
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:42:50 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:42:50 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QNc9g14610 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:38:10 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id F011A2940CF; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5AE29409A for <fork@xent.com>; Thu,
26 Sep 2002 16:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26554 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2002 23:37:32 -0000
Received: from dsl.206.191.151.102.evergo.net (HELO JMHALL)
(206.191.151.102) by mail.evergo.net with SMTP; 26 Sep 2002 23:37:32 -0000
Reply-To: <johnhall@evergo.net>
From: "John Hall" <johnhall@evergo.net>
To: "FoRK" <fork@example.com>
Subject: RE: Liberalism in America
Message-Id: <003b01c265b5$af603900$0200a8c0@JMHALL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <ILEHJNJFPDLMDEKNIAKCOEKDCAAA.geege@barrera.org>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:37:27 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
T_OUTLOOK_REPLY,T_URI_COUNT_3_5
version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
In essence, hindsight justification. The progressives weren't in the
middle, they were in a society at one end and they wanted a society at
the other end. The middle is more or less where they got stopped.
As to an intervention that worked, I actually have some nice things to
say about the SEC, at least in theory. I have a few nasty things to say
as well, but on the whole it has been a very good thing.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of
Geege
> Schuman
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:37 PM
> To: fork@example.com
> Subject: Liberalism in America
>
> liberalism
> propagandized as meddling
> in truth, the middle
>
> "American liberalism believes that in this respect it has made a major
> contribution to the grand strategy of freedom. Where both capitalists
and
> socialists in the 1930's were trying to narrow the choice to either/or
--
> either laissez-faire capitalism or bureaucratic socialism -- the New
Deal
> persisted in its vigorous faith that human intelligence and social
> experiment could work out a stable foundation for freedom in a context
of
> security and for security in a context of freedom. That faith remains
the
> best hope of free society today."
>
> fluid yet crunchy,
> gg
>
>
>
>
> http://www.english.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/schleslib.html
|
