1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Sat Sep 14 16:22:40 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6088A16F03
for <jm@localhost>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:22:40 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:22:40 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8E3MbC20623 for
<jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 04:22:38 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6643EB86; Fri, 13 Sep 2002
23:23:01 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
[172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C385C3EAB4
for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
id g8E3MYO19803 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Fri, 13 Sep 2002
23:22:34 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8E3MYk19799 for
<exmh-users@redhat.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:22:34 -0400
Received: from hobbit.linuxworks.com.au
(CPE-203-51-194-212.qld.bigpond.net.au [203.51.194.212]) by mx1.redhat.com
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8E35nw19374 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>;
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:05:49 -0400
Received: (from tony@localhost) by hobbit.linuxworks.com.au
(8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8E3Kww29126; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:20:58 +1000
Message-Id: <200209140320.g8E3Kww29126@hobbit.linuxworks.com.au.nospam>
To: exmh-users@example.com
From: Tony Nugent <tony@linuxworks.com.au>
X-Face: ]IrGs{LrofDtGfsrG!As5=G'2HRr2zt:H>djXb5@v|Dr!jOelxzAZ`!}("]}]
Q!)1w#X;)nLlb'XhSu,QL>;)L/l06wsI?rv-xy6%Y1e"BUiV%)mU;]f-5<#U6
UthZ0QrF7\_p#q}*Cn}jd|XT~7P7ik]Q!2u%aTtvc;)zfH\:3f<[a:)M
Organization: Linux Works for network
X-Mailer: nmh-1.0.4 exmh-2.4
X-Os: Linux-2.4 RedHat 7.2
In-Reply-To: message-id <20020913144647.E8CED5D04@ptavv.es.net> of Fri,
Sep 13 07:46:47 2002
Subject: Re: bad focus/click behaviours
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:20:58 +1000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.4 required=7.0
tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri Sep 13 2002 at 07:46, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> > > What is an example of an "anything else" that it fails for for you?
> >
> > Everything else :) I can't even mark text in an exmh message window
> > and then paste it into a terminal window, the cut buffer seems to be
> > completely empty (and its previous contents are no longer there
> > either).
> (This is all guess work and may be bogus.)
>
> Are you running Gnome 1.4? I had similar problems as did several
> co-workers. Updating my Gnome components has fixed it for me and
> others, although I can't say exactly which component did the
> trick. Gnomecore or gtk would seem most likely, but it may have been
> something else.
Indeed I am (this workstation is rh7.2 with gnome1.4, it [mostly?]
works, so I hadn't bothered to updated it to 7.3:)
> In any case, I have not seen the problem for quite a while, now.
So upgrading gnome will fix the problem, it's not an exmh/tktcl
issue.
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Thanks.
Cheers
Tony
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
|
