File: 1730.2092a2c5a1de432db582fa62cf7e254e.eml

package info (click to toggle)
golang-github-gatherstars-com-jwz 1.3.0-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 13,768 kB
  • sloc: makefile: 4
file content (86 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 4,274 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
From secprog-return-491-jm=jmason.org@securityfocus.com  Fri Sep  6 15:25:04 2002
Return-Path: <secprog-return-491-yyyy=example.com@securityfocus.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C1E16F17
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  6 Sep 2002 15:25:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:25:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g869vZC29813 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:57:35 +0100
Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing2.securityfocus.com
    [66.38.151.26]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA18263 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 21:26:46 +0100
Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com
    [66.38.151.19]) by outgoing.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP id
    2272E8F290; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 13:30:49 -0600 (MDT)
Mailing-List: contact secprog-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <secprog.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-Post: <mailto:secprog@securityfocus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:secprog-help@securityfocus.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secprog-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secprog-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list secprog@securityfocus.com
Delivered-To: moderator for secprog@securityfocus.com
Received: (qmail 12196 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 18:51:52 -0000
From: George Dinwiddie <gdinwiddie@min.net>
Message-Id: <200209051908.g85J8bb57967@min.net>
Subject: Re: use of base image / delta image for automated recovery from
    attacks
To: bmord@icon-nicholson.com (Ben Mord)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 15:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: crispin@wirex.com (Crispin Cowan),
	webappsec@securityfocus.com (Webappsec Securityfocus.Com),
	SECPROG@securityfocus.com (SECPROG     Securityfocus)
In-Reply-To: <NAEOJLMPJMJDFPLHIOJOGEHBDBAA.bmord@icon-nicholson.com> from
    "Ben Mord"
    at Sep 05, 2002 11:42:40 AM
Organization: Hovel-On-The-Water
X-Quote: Hope your road is a long one. May there be many summer mornings
    when, with what pleasure, what joy, you enter harbors you're seeing for
    the first time; (from Ithaka by C.P. Cavafy)
X-Message-Flag: Don't look at this.  Read the message.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

> Ben Mord said:
> 
> >Ah. In that case, you can use something considerably less powerful than
> >VMWare. All you need is a machine configured to boot from CD-ROM and use
> >a RAM disk for scratch space. Numerous Linux distros are available that
> >let you boot a stateless but functional system from CD-ROM.
> 
> But RAM is expensive, and the directory structures of many systems (e.g.
> Windows) are not sufficiently organized and standardized to make this
> combination of bootable CDs and RAM drives practical. Even if you are
> fortunate enough to be using Linux (or another FHS-compliant *nix), you
> still can't fit a lot on a CD. Its not unusual today to have gigabytes of
> static multimedia content on the web server. This particular problem can be
> alleviated somewhat by using DVDs, but this is a temporary solution at best
> which will become outdated quickly as our data requirements grow and hard
> drives become cheaper.

So, just write-protect the hard disk for partitions that are static.
I seem to recall an article on this (early 80's, Byte magazine, perhaps?)
for BBS systems or for testing unknown (perhaps trojan horse) software.

 - George

-- 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  George Dinwiddie                             gdinwiddie@alberg30.org
  The gods do not deduct from man's allotted span those hours spent in
  sailing.                                    http://www.Alberg30.org/
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------