1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432
|
(sampling)=
# Sampling from the posterior distribution
When analyzing empirical networks, one should be open to the possibility
that there will be more than one fit of the SBM with similar posterior
probabilities. In such situations, one should instead `sample`
partitions from the posterior distribution, instead of simply finding
its maximum. One can then compute quantities that are averaged over the
different model fits, weighted according to their posterior
probabilities.
Full support for model averaging is implemented in `graph-tool` via an efficient
[Markov chain Monte Carlo
(MCMC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain_Monte_Carlo) algorithm
{cite}`inf-peixoto_efficient_2014`. It works by attempting to move nodes into
different groups with specific probabilities, and [accepting or
rejecting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis%E2%80%93Hastings_algorithm)
such moves so that, after a sufficiently long time, the partitions will be
observed with the desired posterior probability. The algorithm is designed so
that its run-time (i.e. each sweep of the MCMC) is linear on the number of edges
in the network, and independent on the number of groups being used in the model,
and hence is suitable for use on very large networks.
In order to perform such moves, one needs again to operate with
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.BlockState` or
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.NestedBlockState`
instances, and calling either their
{meth}`~graph_tool.inference.BlockState.mcmc_sweep` or
{meth}`~graph_tool.inference.BlockState.multiflip_mcmc_sweep`
methods. The former implements a simpler MCMC where a single node is
moved at a time, where the latter is a more efficient version that
performs merges and splits {cite}`inf-peixoto_merge-split_2020`, which should be
in general preferred.
For example, the following will perform 1000 sweeps of the algorithm
with the network of characters in the novel Les Misérables, starting
from a random partition into 20 groups
```{testcode} model-averaging
g = gt.collection.data["lesmis"]
state = gt.BlockState(g) # This automatically initializes the state with a partition
# into one group. The user could also pass a higher number
# to start with a random partition of a given size, or pass a
# specific initial partition using the 'b' parameter.
# Now we run 1,000 sweeps of the MCMC. Note that the number of groups
# is allowed to change, so it will eventually move from the initial
# value of B=1 to whatever is most appropriate for the data.
dS, nattempts, nmoves = state.multiflip_mcmc_sweep(niter=1000)
print("Change in description length:", dS)
print("Number of accepted vertex moves:", nmoves)
```
```{testoutput} model-averaging
Change in description length: -80.840379...
Number of accepted vertex moves: 72451
```
Although the above is sufficient to implement sampling from the
posterior, there is a convenience function called
{func}`~graph_tool.inference.mcmc_equilibrate` that is intend to
simplify the detection of equilibration, by keeping track of the maximum
and minimum values of description length encountered and how many sweeps
have been made without a "record breaking" event. For example,
```{testcode} model-averaging
# We will accept equilibration if 10 sweeps are completed without a
# record breaking event, 2 consecutive times.
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, wait=10, nbreaks=2, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10))
```
Note that the value of `wait` above was made purposefully low so that
the output would not be overly long. The most appropriate value requires
experimentation, but a typically good value is `wait=1000`.
The function {func}`~graph_tool.inference.mcmc_equilibrate` accepts
a `callback` argument that takes an optional function to be invoked
after each call to
{meth}`~graph_tool.inference.BlockState.multiflip_mcmc_sweep`. This
function should accept a single parameter which will contain the actual
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.BlockState` instance. We will
use this in the example below to collect the posterior vertex marginals
(via {class}`~graph_tool.inference.PartitionModeState`,
which disambiguates group labels {cite}`inf-peixoto_revealing_2021`), i.e. the
posterior probability that a node belongs to a given group:
```{testcode} model-averaging
# We will first equilibrate the Markov chain
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, wait=1000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10))
bs = [] # collect some partitions
def collect_partitions(s):
global bs
bs.append(s.b.a.copy())
# Now we collect partitions for exactly 100,000 sweeps, at intervals
# of 10 sweeps:
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=10000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10),
callback=collect_partitions)
# Disambiguate partitions and obtain marginals
pmode = gt.PartitionModeState(bs, converge=True)
pv = pmode.get_marginal(g)
# Now the node marginals are stored in property map pv. We can
# visualize them as pie charts on the nodes:
state.draw(pos=g.vp.pos, vertex_shape="pie", vertex_pie_fractions=pv,
output="lesmis-sbm-marginals.svg")
```
:::{figure} output/lesmis-sbm-marginals.*
:align: center
:width: 450px
Marginal probabilities of group memberships of the network of
characters in the novel Les Misérables, according to the
degree-corrected SBM. The [pie fractions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pie_chart) on the nodes correspond
to the probability of being in group associated with the respective
color.
:::
We can also obtain a marginal probability on the number of groups
itself, as follows.
```{testcode} model-averaging
h = np.zeros(g.num_vertices() + 1)
def collect_num_groups(s):
B = s.get_nonempty_B()
h[B] += 1
# Now we collect partitions for exactly 100,000 sweeps, at intervals
# of 10 sweeps:
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=10000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10),
callback=collect_num_groups)
```
```{testcode} model-averaging
:hide:
figure()
Bs = np.arange(len(h))
idx = h > 0
bar(Bs[idx], h[idx] / h.sum(), width=1, color="#ccb974")
gca().set_xticks([6,7,8,9])
xlabel("$B$")
ylabel(r"$P(B|\boldsymbol A)$")
savefig("lesmis-B-posterior.svg")
```
:::{figure} output/lesmis-B-posterior.*
:align: center
Marginal posterior probability of the number of nonempty groups for
the network of characters in the novel Les Misérables, according to
the degree-corrected SBM.
:::
## Hierarchical partitions
We can also perform model averaging using the nested SBM, which will
give us a distribution over hierarchies. The whole procedure is fairly
analogous, but now we make use of
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.NestedBlockState` instances.
Here we perform the sampling of hierarchical partitions using the same
network as above.
```{testcode} nested-model-averaging
g = gt.collection.data["lesmis"]
state = gt.NestedBlockState(g) # By default this creates a state with an initial single-group
# hierarchy of depth ceil(log2(g.num_vertices()).
# Now we run 1000 sweeps of the MCMC
dS, nmoves = 0, 0
for i in range(100):
ret = state.multiflip_mcmc_sweep(niter=10)
dS += ret[0]
nmoves += ret[1]
print("Change in description length:", dS)
print("Number of accepted vertex moves:", nmoves)
```
```{testoutput} nested-model-averaging
Change in description length: -70.783750...
Number of accepted vertex moves: 286321
```
:::{warning}
When using
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.NestedBlockState`, a
single call to
{meth}`~graph_tool.inference.NestedBlockState.multiflip_mcmc_sweep`
or
{meth}`~graph_tool.inference.NestedBlockState.mcmc_sweep`
performs `niter` sweeps at each hierarchical level once. This means
that in order for the chain to equilibrate, we need to call these
functions several times, i.e. it is not enough to call it once with a
large value of `niter`.
:::
Similarly to the the non-nested case, we can use
{func}`~graph_tool.inference.mcmc_equilibrate` to do most of the boring
work, and we can now obtain vertex marginals on all hierarchical levels:
```{testcode} nested-model-averaging
# We will first equilibrate the Markov chain
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, wait=1000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10))
# collect nested partitions
bs = []
def collect_partitions(s):
global bs
bs.append(s.get_bs())
# Now we collect the marginals for exactly 100,000 sweeps
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=10000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10),
callback=collect_partitions)
# Disambiguate partitions and obtain marginals
pmode = gt.PartitionModeState(bs, nested=True, converge=True)
pv = pmode.get_marginal(g)
# Get consensus estimate
bs = pmode.get_max_nested()
state = state.copy(bs=bs)
# We can visualize the marginals as pie charts on the nodes:
state.draw(vertex_shape="pie", vertex_pie_fractions=pv,
output="lesmis-nested-sbm-marginals.svg")
```
:::{figure} output/lesmis-nested-sbm-marginals.*
:align: center
:width: 450px
Marginal probabilities of group memberships of the network of
characters in the novel Les Misérables, according to the nested
degree-corrected SBM. The pie fractions on the nodes correspond to
the probability of being in group associated with the respective
color.
:::
We can also obtain a marginal probability of the number of groups
itself, as follows.
```{testcode} nested-model-averaging
h = [np.zeros(g.num_vertices() + 1) for s in state.get_levels()]
def collect_num_groups(s):
for l, sl in enumerate(s.get_levels()):
B = sl.get_nonempty_B()
h[l][B] += 1
# Now we collect the marginal distribution for exactly 100,000 sweeps
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=10000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10),
callback=collect_num_groups)
```
```{testcode} nested-model-averaging
:hide:
figure()
f, ax = plt.subplots(1, 5, figsize=(10, 3))
for i, h_ in enumerate(h[:5]):
Bs = np.arange(len(h_))
idx = h_ > 0
ax[i].bar(Bs[idx], h_[idx] / h_.sum(), width=1, color="#ccb974")
ax[i].set_xticks(Bs[idx])
ax[i].set_xlabel("$B_{%d}$" % i)
ax[i].set_ylabel(r"$P(B_{%d}|\boldsymbol A)$" % i)
locator = MaxNLocator(prune='both', nbins=5)
ax[i].yaxis.set_major_locator(locator)
tight_layout()
savefig("lesmis-nested-B-posterior.svg")
```
:::{figure} output/lesmis-nested-B-posterior.*
:align: center
Marginal posterior probability of the number of nonempty groups
$B_l$ at each hierarchy level $l$ for the network of
characters in the novel Les Misérables, according to the nested
degree-corrected SBM.
:::
Below we obtain some hierarchical partitions sampled from the posterior
distribution.
```{testcode} nested-model-averaging
for i in range(10):
for j in range(100):
state.multiflip_mcmc_sweep(niter=10)
state.draw(output="lesmis-partition-sample-%i.svg" % i, empty_branches=False)
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-0.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-1.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-2.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-3.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-4.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-5.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-6.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-7.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-8.svg
:width: 19%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-sample-9.svg
:width: 19%
```
## Characterizing the posterior distribution
The posterior distribution of partitions can have an elaborate
structure, containing multiple possible explanations for the data. In
order to summarize it, we can infer the modes of the distribution using
{class}`~graph_tool.inference.ModeClusterState`, as
described in {cite}`inf-peixoto_revealing_2021`. This amounts to identifying
clusters of partitions that are very similar to each other, but
sufficiently different from those that belong to other
clusters. Collective, such "modes" represent the different stories that
the data is telling us through the model. Here is an example using again
the Les Misérables network:
```{testsetup} partition-modes
mkchdir(DOC_DIR + "/demos/inference/output")
np.random.seed(42)
gt.seed_rng(42)
```
```{testcode} partition-modes
g = gt.collection.data["lesmis"]
state = gt.NestedBlockState(g)
# Equilibration
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=1000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10))
bs = []
def collect_partitions(s):
global bs
bs.append(s.get_bs())
# We will collect only partitions 1000 partitions. For more accurate
# results, this number should be increased.
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(state, force_niter=1000, mcmc_args=dict(niter=10),
callback=collect_partitions)
# Infer partition modes
pmode = gt.ModeClusterState(bs, nested=True)
# Minimize the mode state itself
gt.mcmc_equilibrate(pmode, wait=1, mcmc_args=dict(niter=1, beta=np.inf))
# Get inferred modes
modes = pmode.get_modes()
for i, mode in enumerate(modes):
b = mode.get_max_nested() # mode's maximum
pv = mode.get_marginal(g) # mode's marginal distribution
print(f"Mode {i} with size {mode.get_M()/len(bs)}")
state = state.copy(bs=b)
state.draw(vertex_shape="pie", vertex_pie_fractions=pv,
output="lesmis-partition-mode-%i.svg" % i)
```
Running the above code gives us the relative size of each mode,
corresponding to their collective posterior probability.
```{testoutput} partition-modes
Mode 0 with size 0.346346...
Mode 1 with size 0.309309...
Mode 2 with size 0.292292...
Mode 3 with size 0.051051...
Mode 4 with size 0.001001...
```
Below are the marginal node distributions representing the partitions that belong to each inferred mode:
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-mode-0.svg
:width: 24%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-mode-1.svg
:width: 24%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-mode-2.svg
:width: 24%
```
```{image} output/lesmis-partition-mode-3.svg
:width: 24%
```
|