1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
/*
* Copyright (C) 2009 The Guava Authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package com.google.common.collect;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationStreamReader;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationStreamWriter;
/**
* Even though {@link ImmutableSortedMap} cannot be instantiated, we still need a custom field
* serializer. TODO(cpovirk): why? Does it help if ensure that the GWT and non-GWT classes have the
* same fields? Is that worth the trouble?
*
* @author Chris Povirk
*/
public final class ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializer {
public static void deserialize(
SerializationStreamReader reader, ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instance) {}
public static ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instantiate(SerializationStreamReader reader)
throws SerializationException {
return ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializerBase.instantiate(reader);
}
public static void serialize(SerializationStreamWriter writer, ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instance)
throws SerializationException {
ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializerBase.serialize(writer, instance);
}
}
|
