1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400
|
>>==== MODE ====>>
citation
<<==== MODE ====<<
>>==== RESULT ====>>
(Philpott, Arendt, et al. 2008)
(Philpott, Perfecto, et al. 2008<i>a</i>)
(Philpott, Perfecto, et al. 2008<i>b</i>)
<<==== RESULT ====<<
>>==== CITATION-ITEMS ====>>
[
[
{
"id": "ITEM-1"
}
],
[
{
"id": "ITEM-2"
}
],
[
{
"id": "ITEM-3"
}
]
]
<<==== CITATION-ITEMS ====<<
>>==== CSL ====>>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<style xmlns="http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl" class="in-text" version="1.0" demote-non-dropping-particle="sort-only" default-locale="en-US" page-range-format="expanded">
<info>
<title>Northeastern Naturalist</title>
<id>http://www.zotero.org/styles/northeastern-naturalist</id>
<link href="http://www.zotero.org/styles/northeastern-naturalist" rel="self"/>
<link href="http://www.zotero.org/styles/the-journal-of-wildlife-management" rel="template"/>
<link href="http://www.eaglehill.us/programs/journals/nena/NENAauthor.pdf" rel="documentation"/>
<author>
<name>Sebastian Karcher</name>
</author>
<category citation-format="author-date"/>
<category field="biology"/>
<issn>1092-6194</issn>
<eissn>1938-5307</eissn>
<updated>2012-09-27T22:06:38+00:00</updated>
<rights license="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License</rights>
</info>
<macro name="author">
<names variable="author" suffix=".">
<name sort-separator=", " initialize-with="." and="text" name-as-sort-order="first" delimiter=", " delimiter-precedes-last="always"/>
<label form="short" prefix=" (" suffix=")" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
<substitute>
<names variable="editor"/>
<text variable="title"/>
</substitute>
</names>
</macro>
<macro name="editor">
<names variable="editor">
<name sort-separator=" " initialize-with="." and="text" delimiter=", "/>
<label form="short" prefix=" (" suffix=")" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
</names>
</macro>
<macro name="author-short">
<names variable="author">
<name form="short" and="text" delimiter=", " initialize-with="."/>
<substitute>
<names variable="editor"/>
<text variable="title"/>
</substitute>
</names>
</macro>
<macro name="year-date">
<choose>
<if variable="issued">
<date variable="issued">
<date-part name="year"/>
</date>
<text variable="year-suffix" font-style="italic"/>
</if>
<else>
<text term="no date" form="short"/>
</else>
</choose>
</macro>
<macro name="chapter-info">
<group delimiter=" ">
<choose>
<if type="chapter paper-conference" match="any">
<group delimiter=" ">
<label variable="page" text-case="capitalize-first" form="short"/>
<text variable="page" suffix=","/>
<text term="in" font-style="italic" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
</group>
</if>
</choose>
<text macro="editor"/>
</group>
</macro>
<macro name="container">
<choose>
<if type="article-journal article-magazine" match="any">
<group delimiter=" ">
<text variable="container-title"/>
<group delimiter=":">
<text variable="volume"/>
<text variable="page"/>
</group>
</group>
</if>
<else-if type="article-newspaper">
<text variable="container-title"/>
<date variable="issued" delimiter=" ">
<date-part name="day"/>
<date-part name="month"/>
<date-part name="year"/>
</date>
<text variable="section" prefix="; section "/>
<text variable="page" prefix=":"/>
</else-if>
<else>
<text variable="container-title"/>
</else>
</choose>
</macro>
<macro name="publisher">
<group delimiter=", ">
<group delimiter=" ">
<text variable="collection-title"/>
<text variable="collection-number"/>
</group>
<text variable="publisher"/>
<text variable="publisher-place"/>
</group>
</macro>
<macro name="edition">
<choose>
<if is-numeric="edition">
<group delimiter=" ">
<number variable="edition" form="long-ordinal" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
<text term="edition"/>
</group>
</if>
<else>
<text variable="edition"/>
</else>
</choose>
</macro>
<macro name="volume">
<choose>
<if type="article-journal article-magazine" match="none">
<choose>
<if variable="volume">
<group delimiter=" ">
<text term="volume" text-case="capitalize-first" form="short"/>
<text variable="volume"/>
</group>
</if>
</choose>
</if>
</choose>
</macro>
<macro name="accessed">
<choose>
<if variable="URL">
<group delimiter=". ">
<text variable="URL" prefix="Available online at "/>
<group delimiter=" ">
<text term="accessed" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
<date variable="accessed" delimiter=" ">
<date-part name="month" text-case="capitalize-first"/>
<date-part name="day" suffix=","/>
<date-part name="year"/>
</date>
</group>
</group>
</if>
</choose>
</macro>
<citation et-al-min="3" et-al-use-first="1" disambiguate-add-year-suffix="true" disambiguate-add-names="true" disambiguate-add-givenname="true" givenname-disambiguation-rule="by-cite" collapse="year-suffix">
<sort>
<key macro="author-short"/>
<key macro="year-date"/>
</sort>
<layout prefix="(" suffix=")" delimiter=", ">
<group delimiter=":">
<group delimiter=" ">
<text macro="author-short"/>
<text macro="year-date"/>
</group>
<text variable="locator"/>
</group>
</layout>
</citation>
<bibliography entry-spacing="0" hanging-indent="true">
<sort>
<key macro="author"/>
<key macro="year-date"/>
</sort>
<layout suffix=".">
<group delimiter=". ">
<text macro="author"/>
<text macro="year-date"/>
<text variable="title"/>
<text macro="chapter-info"/>
<text macro="container"/>
<text macro="edition"/>
<text macro="volume"/>
<text variable="genre"/>
<text macro="publisher"/>
<text variable="number-of-pages" suffix=" pp."/>
<text macro="accessed"/>
</group>
</layout>
</bibliography>
</style>
<<==== CSL ====<<
>>==== INPUT ====>>
[
{
"DOI": "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01029.x",
"URL": "http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01029.x",
"abstract": "Studies have documented biodiversity losses due to intensification of coffee management (reduction in canopy richness and complexity). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding relative sensitivity of different taxa, habitat specialists, and functional groups, and whether implications for biodiversity conservation vary across regions. We quantitatively reviewed data from ant, bird, and tree biodiversity studies in coffee agroecosystems to address the following questions: Does species richness decline with intensification or with individual vegetation characteristics? Are there significant losses of species richness in coffee-management systems compared with forests? Is species loss greater for forest species or for particular functional groups? and Are ants or birds more strongly affected by intensification? Across studies, ant and bird richness declined with management intensification and with changes in vegetation. Species richness of all ants and birds and of forest ant and bird species was lower in most coffee agroecosystems than in forests, but rustic coffee (grown under native forest canopies) had equal or greater ant and bird richness than nearby forests. Sun coffee (grown without canopy trees) sustained the highest species losses, and species loss of forest ant, bird, and tree species increased with management intensity. Losses of ant and bird species were similar, although losses of forest ants were more drastic in rustic coffee. Richness of migratory birds and of birds that forage across vegetation strata was less affected by intensification than richness of resident, canopy, and understory bird species. Rustic farms protected more species than other coffee systems, and loss of species depended greatly on habitat specialization and functional traits. We recommend that forest be protected, rustic coffee be promoted, and intensive coffee farms be restored by augmenting native tree density and richness and allowing growth of epiphytes. We also recommend that future research focus on potential trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and farmer livelihoods stemming from coffee production. Diversos estudios han documentado las p�rdidas de biodiversidad debido a la intensificaci�n del manejo de caf� (disminuci�n de la riqueza y complejidad del dosel). Sin embargo, persisten preguntas sobre la sensibilidad relativa de diferentes taxa, especialistas de h�bitat y grupos funcionales, y s� las implicaciones para la conservaci�n de la biodiversidad var�an entre regiones. Revisamos cuantitativamente los datos de estudios de biodiversidad de hormigas, aves y �rboles en agroecosistemas de caf� para abordar las siguientes preguntas: �La riqueza de especies declina con la intensificaci�n o con las caracter�sticas individuales de la vegetaci�n?�Hay p�rdidas significativas de riqueza de especies en los sistemas cafetaleros en comparaci�n con los bosques?�Es mayor la p�rdida en especies de bosque o en grupos funcionales particulares? y �Las aves o las hormigas son m�s afectadas por la intensificaci�n? En los estudios revisados, la riqueza de hormigas y aves declin� con la intensificaci�n del manejo y con los cambios de vegetaci�n. La riqueza de especies de todas las hormigas y aves y la de especies de hormigas y aves de bosque fue menor en la mayor�a de los agroecosistemas cafetaleros que en los bosques, pero el caf� r�stico (cultivado bajo dosel de bosque nativo) sustent� la mayor p�rdida de especies, y la p�rdida de especies de hormigas, aves y �rboles de bosque aument� con la intensificaci�n del manejo. Las p�rdidas de especies de hormigas y aves fueron similares, aunque las p�rdidas de hormigas de bosque fueron m�s dr�sticas en el caf� r�stico. La riqueza de especies de aves migratorias y de aves que forrajean en varios estratos de vegetaci�n fueron menos afectadas por la intensificaci�n que las especies residentes de dosel y de sotobosque. Las fincas r�sticas protegieron m�s especies que otros sistemas cafetaleros, y la p�rdida de especies dependi� mayormente de la especializaci�n de h�bitat y de los atributos funcionales. Recomendamos que el bosque sea protegido, se promueva el caf� r�stico y se restauren las fincas intensivas mediante el incremento de la densidad y riqueza de �rboles nativos y permitiendo el crecimiento de ep�fitas. Tambi�n recomendamos que las futuras investigaciones enfoquen las compensaciones potenciales entre la conservaci�n de la biodiversidad y la forma de vida de los campesinos que producen caf�.",
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
"2008",
9,
25
]
]
},
"author": [
{
"family": "Philpott",
"given": "S. M."
},
{
"family": "Arendt",
"given": "W. J."
},
{
"family": "Armbrecht",
"given": "I."
},
{
"family": "Bichier",
"given": "P."
},
{
"family": "Dietsch",
"given": "T. V."
},
{
"family": "Gordon",
"given": "C."
},
{
"family": "Greenberg",
"given": "R."
},
{
"family": "Perfecto",
"given": "I."
},
{
"family": "Reynoso-Santos",
"given": "R."
},
{
"family": "Soto-Pinto",
"given": "L."
},
{
"family": "Tejeda-Cruz",
"given": "C."
},
{
"family": "Williams-Linera",
"given": "G."
},
{
"family": "Valenzuela",
"given": "J."
},
{
"family": "Zolotoff",
"given": "J. M."
}
],
"container-title": "Conservation Biology",
"id": "ITEM-1",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
"2008"
]
]
},
"key": "WQDG7EP5",
"page": "1093-1105",
"source": "Wiley InterScience",
"title": "Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees",
"title-short": "Biodiversity Loss in Latin American Coffee Landscapes",
"type": "article-journal",
"volume": "22"
},
{
"DOI": "10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[181:BDOPAA]2.0.CO;2",
"ISSN": "0046-225X",
"URL": "http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37%5B181:BDOPAA%5D2.0.CO%3B2",
"abstract": "Aspects of predator assemblages that alter predator effects on prey have received extensive recent attention. Among other mechanisms, differences in behavior or resource use within predator trophic levels may enhance predator effects on prey, especially if effects of each predator species differ with environmental conditions. We address whether three common ant species (Azteca instabilis F. Smith, Camponotus textor Forel, and Crematogaster spp.) are functionally unique in coffee agroecosystems, asking if each species differs in (1) cooperative foraging behavior, (2) responses to experimentally introduced herbivores, and (3) responses to pest outbreaks. Furthermore, we examined the behaviors and effects of each ant species under different conditions by varying herbivore species, herbivore size, and herbivore density and carrying out observations in different seasons. Ant species significantly differed in foraging behaviors, in effects on individual herbivores, and in responses to pest outbreaks in terms of both type and time of response to herbivores. The behaviors and effects of each ant species differed in the dry and wet seasons and for different herbivore species and sizes. Although A. instabilis generally removed more larvae and more quickly removed larvae, this was not the case under all conditions. The data presented thus support that common ant species in coffee agroecosystems are behaviorally diverse in their responses to herbivores under different conditions. We discuss the implications of these differences in ant behaviors for enhancement of predatory function in light of both multipredator effects and in terms of the potential importance of predator diversity.",
"author": [
{
"family": "Philpott",
"given": "S. M."
},
{
"family": "Perfecto",
"given": "I."
},
{
"family": "Vandermeer",
"given": "J."
}
],
"container-title": "Environmental Entomology",
"id": "ITEM-2",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
"2008"
]
]
},
"key": "74WGHVRQ",
"page": "181-191",
"source": "BioOne",
"title": "Behavioral diversity of predatory arboreal ants in coffee agroecosystems",
"type": "article-journal",
"volume": "37"
},
{
"DOI": "10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01358.x",
"ISSN": "1365-2656",
"URL": "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01358.x/abstract",
"abstract": "Ants are important predators in agricultural systems, and have complex and often strong effects on lower trophic levels. Agricultural intensification reduces habitat complexity, food web diversity and structure, and affects predator communities. Theory predicts that strong top-down cascades are less likely to occur as habitat and food web complexity decrease. * 2To examine relationships between habitat complexity and predator effects, we excluded ants from coffee plants in coffee agroecosystems varying in vegetation complexity. Specifically, we studied the effects of eliminating ants on arthropod assemblages, herbivory, damage by the coffee berry borer and coffee yields in four sites differing in management intensification. We also sampled ant assemblages in each management type to see whether changes in ant assemblages relate to any observed changes in top-down effects. * 3Removing ants did not change total arthropod densities, herbivory, coffee berry borer damage or coffee yields. Ants did affect densities of some arthropod orders, but did not affect densities of different feeding groups. The effects of ants on lower trophic levels did not change with coffee management intensity. * 4Diversity and activity of ants on experimental plants did not change with coffee intensification, but the ant species composition differed. * 5Although variation in habitat complexity may affect trophic cascades, manipulating predatory ants across a range of coffee agroecosystems varying in management intensity did not result in differing effects on arthropod assemblages, herbivory, coffee berry borer attack or coffee yields. Thus, there is no clear pattern that top-down effects of ants in coffee agroecosystems intensify or dampen with decreased habitat complexity.",
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
"2013",
6,
10
]
]
},
"author": [
{
"family": "Philpott",
"given": "S. M."
},
{
"family": "Perfecto",
"given": "I."
},
{
"family": "Vandermeer",
"given": "J."
}
],
"container-title": "Journal of Animal Ecology",
"id": "ITEM-3",
"issue": "3",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
"2008"
]
]
},
"key": "95I7USJP",
"language": "en",
"page": "505–511",
"source": "Wiley Online Library",
"title": "Effects of predatory ants on lower trophic levels across a gradient of coffee management complexity",
"type": "article-journal",
"volume": "77"
}
]
<<==== INPUT ====<<
>>===== VERSION =====>>
1.0
<<===== VERSION =====<<
|