1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
|
# Difference Lists
[![test-badge][]][test]
[![hackage-badge][]][hackage-dlist]
[![packdeps-badge][]][packdeps]
_**List-like types supporting O(1) `append` and `snoc` operations.**_
## Installation
[`dlist`][hackage-dlist] is a Haskell package available from [Hackage][hackage].
It can be installed with [`cabal`][cabal] or [`stack`][stack].
See the [change log][changelog] for the changes in each version.
## Usage
Here is an example of “flattening” a `Tree` into a list of the elements in its
`Leaf` constructors:
```haskell
import qualified Data.DList as DList
data Tree a = Leaf a | Branch (Tree a) (Tree a)
flattenSlow :: Tree a -> [a]
flattenSlow = go
where
go (Leaf x) = [x]
go (Branch left right) = go left ++ go right
flattenFast :: Tree a -> [a]
flattenFast = DList.toList . go
where
go (Leaf x) = DList.singleton x
go (Branch left right) = go left `DList.append` go right
```
(The above code can be found in the [benchmark][].)
`flattenSlow` is likely to be slower than `flattenFast`:
1. `flattenSlow` uses `++` to concatenate lists, each of which is recursively
constructed from the `left` and `right` `Tree` values in the `Branch`
constructor.
2. `flattenFast` does not use `++` but constructs a composition of functions,
each of which is a “cons” introduced by `DList.singleton` (`(x :)`). The
function `DList.toList` applies the composed function to `[]`, constructing
a list in the end.
To see the difference between `flattenSlow` and `flattenFast`, consider some
rough evaluations of the functions applied to a `Tree`:
```haskell
flattenSlow (Branch (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) (Leaf 'c'))
= go (Branch (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) (Leaf 'c'))
= go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) ++ go (Leaf 'c')
= (go (Leaf 'a') ++ go (Leaf 'b')) ++ "c"
= ("a" ++ "b") ++ "c"
= ('a' : [] ++ "b") ++ "c"
= ('a' : "b") ++ "c"
= 'a' : "b" ++ "c"
= 'a' : 'b' : [] ++ "c"
= 'a' : 'b' : "c"
```
```haskell
flattenFast (Branch (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) (Leaf 'c'))
= toList $ go (Branch (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) (Leaf 'c'))
= toList $ go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b')) `append` go (Leaf 'c')
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b'))) . unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'c')) $ []
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b'))) (unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'c')) [])
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b'))) (unsafeApplyDList (singleton 'c') [])
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b'))) (unsafeApplyDList (UnsafeDList ((:) 'c')) [])
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Branch (Leaf 'a') (Leaf 'b'))) "c"
= unsafeApplyDList (UnsafeDList (unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'a')) . unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'b')))) "c"
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'a')) (unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'b')) "c")
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'a')) (unsafeApplyDList (singleton 'b') "c")
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'a')) (unsafeApplyDList (UnsafeDList ((:) 'b')) "c")
= unsafeApplyDList (go (Leaf 'a')) ('b' : "c")
= unsafeApplyDList (singleton 'a') ('b' : "c")
= unsafeApplyDList (UnsafeDList ((:) 'a')) ('b' : "c")
= 'a' : 'b' : "c"
```
The left-nested `++` in `flattenSlow` results in intermediate list constructions
that are immediately discarded in the evaluation of the outermost `++`. On the
other hand, the evaluation of `flattenFast` involves no intermediate list
construction but rather function applications and `newtype` constructor wrapping
and unwrapping. This is where the efficiency comes from.
_**Warning!**_ Note that there is truth in the above, but there is also a lot of
hand-waving and intrinsic complexity. For example, there may be GHC rewrite
rules that apply to `++`, which will change the actual evaluation. And, of
course, strictness, laziness, and sharing all play a significant role. Also, not
every function in the `dlist` package is the most efficient for every situation.
_**Moral of the story:**_ If you are using `dlist` to speed up your code, check
to be sure that it actually does. Benchmark!
## Design Notes
These are some notes on design and development choices made for the `dlist`
package.
### Avoid `++`
The original intent of Hughes' representation of lists as first-class functions
was to provide an abstraction such that the list `append` operation found in
functional programming languages (and now called `++` in Haskell) would not
appear in left-nested positions to avoid duplicated structure as lists are
constructed. The lesson learned by many people using list over the years is that
the `append` operation can appear, sometimes surprisingly, in places they don't
expect it.
One of our goals is for the `dlist` package to avoid surprising its users with
unexpected insertions of `++`. Towards this end, there should be a minimal set
of functions in `dlist` in which `++` can be directly or indirectly found. The
list of known uses of `++` includes:
* `DList`: `fromList`, `fromString`, `read`
* `DNonEmpty`: `fromList`, `fromNonEmpty`, `fromString`, `read`
If any future requested functions involve `++` (e.g. via `fromList`), the burden
of inclusion is higher than it would be otherwise.
### Abstraction
The `DList` representation and its supporting functions (e.g. `append`, `snoc`,
etc.) rely on an invariant to preserve its safe use. That is, without this
invariant, a user may encounter unexpected outcomes.
(We use safety in the sense that the semantics are well-defined and expected,
not in the sense of side of referential transparency. The invariant does not
directly lead to side effects in the `dlist` package, but a program that uses an
unsafely generated `DList` may do something surprising.)
The invariant is that, for any `xs :: DList a`:
```haskell
fromList (toList xs) = xs
```
To see how this invariant can be broken, consider this example:
```haskell
xs :: DList a
xs = UnsafeDList (const [])
fromList (toList (xs `snoc` 1))
= fromList (toList (UnsafeDList (const []) `snoc` 1))
= fromList (toList (UnsafeDList (unsafeApplyDList (UnsafeDList (const [])) . (x :))))
= fromList (toList (UnsafeDList (const [] . (x :))))
= fromList (($ []) . unsafeApplyDList $ UnsafeDList (const [] . (x :)))
= fromList (const [] . (x :) $ [])
= fromList (const [] [x])
= fromList []
= UnsafeDList (++ [])
```
The invariant can also be stated as:
```haskell
toList (fromList (toList xs)) = toList xs
```
And we can restate the example as:
```haskell
toList (fromList (toList (xs `snoc` 1)))
= toList (UnsafeDList (++ []))
= []
```
It would be rather unhelpful and surprising to find ``(xs `snoc` 1)`` turned out
to be the empty list.
To preserve the invariant on `DList`, we provide it as an abstract type in the
`Data.DList` module. The constructor, `UnsafeDList`, and record label,
`unsafeApplyDList`, are not exported because these can be used, as shown above,
to break the invariant.
All of that said, there have been numerous requests to export the `DList`
constructor. We are not convinced that it is necessary, but we are convinced
that users should decide for themselves.
To use the constructor and record label of `DList`, you import them as follows:
```haskell
import Data.DList.Unsafe (DList(UnsafeDList, unsafeApplyDList))
```
If you are using Safe Haskell, you may need to add this at the top of your
module:
```haskell
{-# LANGUAGE Trustworthy #-}
```
Just be aware that the burden of proof for safety is on you.
## References
These are various references where you can learn more about difference lists.
### Research
* **A novel representation of lists and its application to the function
“reverse.”** John Hughes. Information Processing Letters. Volume 22, Issue 3.
1986-03. Pages 141-144. [PDF][hughes-pdf]
This is the original published source for a representation of lists as
first-class functions.
### Background
* [Wikipedia][wikipedia]
* [Haskell Wiki][wiki-haskell]
* [Stack Overflow][stack-overflow]
### Blogs and Mailing Lists
* [Using Difference Lists][blog-auclair-1]. Douglas M. Auclair. 2008-08-13.
* [A Sort of Difference][blog-kmett]. Edward Kmett. 2008-09-18.
* [Reference for technique wanted][mail-okeefe]. Richard O'Keefe, et al.
2010-10-31.
* [24 Days of Hackage: dlist][blog-charles]. Oliver Charles. 2012-12-14.
* [Constructing a list in a Monad][blog-breitner]. Joachim Breitner. 2013-11-13.
* [Demystifying DList][blog-ellis] ([Reddit][blog-ellis-reddit]). Tom Ellis.
2014-01-24.
* [keepEquals with Difference Lists][blog-auclair-2]. Douglas M. Auclair.
2014-06-21.
### Books
* [Chapter 13. Data Structures][book-real-world-haskell]. Real World Haskell.
2008-12-05.
## License
[BSD 3-Clause “New” or “Revised” License][license] © Don Stewart, Sean Leather,
contributors
[changelog]: https://github.com/spl/dlist/blob/main/changelog.md#change-log
[benchmark]: https://github.com/spl/dlist/blob/main/bench/Main.hs
[blog-auclair-1]: https://logicaltypes.blogspot.com/2008/08/using-difference-lists.html
[blog-auclair-2]: https://logicaltypes.blogspot.com/2014/06/keepequals-with-difference-lists.html
[blog-breitner]: https://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/620-Constructing_a_list_in_a_Monad
[blog-charles]: https://ocharles.org.uk/blog/posts/2012-12-14-24-days-of-hackage-dlist.html
[blog-ellis-reddit]: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1w5duf/demystifying_dlist/
[blog-ellis]: http://h2.jaguarpaw.co.uk/posts/demystifying-dlist/
[blog-kmett]: https://web.archive.org/web/20080918101635/comonad.com/reader/2008/a-sort-of-difference/
[book-real-world-haskell]: http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/data-structures.html
[cabal]: https://cabal.readthedocs.io/
[hackage-badge]: https://img.shields.io/hackage/v/dlist.svg?maxAge=3600
[hackage-dlist]: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/dlist
[hackage]: https://hackage.haskell.org/
[hughes-pdf]: https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/cs257/archive/john-hughes/lists.pdf
[license]: https://github.com/spl/dlist/blob/main/license.md
[mail-okeefe]: https://www.mail-archive.com/haskell-cafe@haskell.org/msg83699.html
[packdeps-badge]: https://img.shields.io/hackage-deps/v/dlist.svg?maxAge=3600
[packdeps]: http://packdeps.haskellers.com/feed?needle=dlist
[stack-overflow]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3352418/what-is-a-dlist
[stack]: https://docs.haskellstack.org/
[test-badge]: https://github.com/spl/dlist/workflows/test/badge.svg
[test]: https://github.com/spl/dlist/actions?query=workflow%3Atest
[wiki-haskell]: https://wiki.haskell.org/Difference_list
[wikipedia]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difference_list
|