1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
// Doc: https://faustlibraries.grame.fr/libs/compressors/
cs = hslider("Compressor [style:radio{'1':0; '2': 1 }]", 0,0,1,1);
c1 = component("compressordsp.dsp"); // ./compressordsp.dsp
c2 = component("compressor2dsp.dsp"); // ./compressor2dsp.dsp
compressor(cs) = _ <: select2(cs,c1,c2);
limiter_group(x) = vgroup("LIMITER [tooltip: https://faustlibraries.grame.fr/libs/compressors/#functions-reference]",x);
process = _ : compressor(cs) : limiter_group(component("limiterdsp.dsp")) <: _,_;
/*
* My present conclusion is to continue with c1, because it uses the
* more standard 'ratio' parameter, while c2 uses 'strength', which becomes
* hard-clipping at strength=1. Also, I hear no compelling difference sonically
* (after laboriously finding a strength value that is roughly comparable to ratio).
*
* Also, c2 is GPL license, which cannot go into closed-source products,
* while c1 can be freely used as desired (STK-4.2 license).
*/
|
