1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216
|
require File.expand_path('../../../spec_helper', __FILE__)
require File.expand_path('../fixtures/classes', __FILE__)
EvalSpecs::A.new.c
describe "Kernel#eval" do
it "is a private method" do
Kernel.should have_private_instance_method(:eval)
end
it "is a module function" do
Kernel.respond_to?(:eval).should == true
end
it "evaluates the code within" do
eval("2 + 3").should == 5
end
it "coerces an object to string" do
eval(EvalSpecs::CoercedObject.new).should == 5
end
it "evaluates within the scope of the eval" do
EvalSpecs::A::B.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::B"
end
it "evaluates such that consts are scoped to the class of the eval" do
EvalSpecs::A::C.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::C"
end
it "finds a local in an enclosing scope" do
a = 1
eval("a").should == 1
end
it "updates a local in an enclosing scope" do
a = 1
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
it "updates a local in a surrounding block scope" do
EvalSpecs.new.f do
a = 1
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
end
it "updates a local in a scope above a surrounding block scope" do
a = 1
EvalSpecs.new.f do
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
a.should == 2
end
it "updates a local in a scope above when modified in a nested block scope" do
a = 1
es = EvalSpecs.new
eval("es.f { es.f { a = 2 } }")
a.should == 2
end
it "finds locals in a nested eval" do
eval('test = 10; eval("test")').should == 10
end
it "does not share locals across eval scopes" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_locals.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "NameError"
end
it "doesn't accept a Proc object as a binding" do
x = 1
bind = proc {}
lambda { eval("x", bind) }.should raise_error(TypeError)
end
it "does not make Proc locals visible to evaluated code" do
bind = proc { inner = 4 }
lambda { eval("inner", bind.binding) }.should raise_error(NameError)
end
# REWRITE ME: This obscures the real behavior of where locals are stored
# in eval bindings.
it "allows a binding to be captured inside an eval" do
outer_binding = binding
level1 = eval("binding", outer_binding)
level2 = eval("binding", level1)
eval("x = 2", outer_binding)
eval("y = 3", level1)
eval("w=1", outer_binding)
eval("w", outer_binding).should == 1
eval("w=1", level1).should == 1
eval("w", level1).should == 1
eval("w=1", level2).should == 1
eval("w", level2).should == 1
eval("x", outer_binding).should == 2
eval("x=2", level1)
eval("x", level1).should == 2
eval("x=2", level2)
eval("x", level2).should == 2
eval("y=3", outer_binding)
eval("y", outer_binding).should == 3
eval("y=3", level1)
eval("y", level1).should == 3
eval("y=3", level2)
eval("y", level2).should == 3
end
it "uses the same scope for local variables when given the same binding" do
outer_binding = binding
eval("if false; a = 1; end", outer_binding)
eval("a", outer_binding).should be_nil
end
it "allows creating a new class in a binding" do
bind = proc {}
eval("class EvalBindingProcA; end; EvalBindingProcA.name", bind.binding).should =~ /EvalBindingProcA$/
end
it "allows creating a new class in a binding created by #eval" do
bind = eval "binding"
eval("class EvalBindingA; end; EvalBindingA.name", bind).should =~ /EvalBindingA$/
end
it "includes file and line information in syntax error" do
expected = 'speccing.rb'
lambda {
eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected)
}.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
e.message.should =~ /#{expected}:1:.+/
}
end
it "evaluates string with given filename and negative linenumber" do
expected_file = 'speccing.rb'
lambda {
eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected_file, -100)
}.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
e.message.should =~ /#{expected_file}:-100:.+/
}
end
it "sets constants at the toplevel from inside a block" do
# The class Object bit is needed to workaround some mspec oddness
class Object
[1].each { eval "Const = 1"}
Const.should == 1
remove_const :Const
end
end
it "uses the filename of the binding if none is provided" do
eval("__FILE__").should == "(eval)"
eval("__FILE__", binding).should == __FILE__
eval("__FILE__", binding, "success").should == "success"
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding").should == "(eval)"
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding).should == __FILE__
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding, 'success').should == 'success'
end
# Found via Rubinius bug github:#149
it "does not alter the value of __FILE__ in the binding" do
first_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval
second_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval
# This bug is seen by calling the method twice and comparing the values
# of __FILE__ each time. If the bug is present, calling eval will set the
# value of __FILE__ to the eval's "filename" argument.
second_time.should_not == "(eval)"
first_time.should == second_time
end
it "can be aliased" do
alias aliased_eval eval
x = 2
aliased_eval('x += 40')
x.should == 42
end
# See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-5163
it "uses the receiver as self inside the eval" do
eval("self").should equal(self)
Kernel.eval("self").should equal(Kernel)
end
it "does not pass the block to the method being eval'ed" do
lambda {
eval('KernelSpecs::EvalTest.call_yield') { "content" }
}.should raise_error(LocalJumpError)
end
it "returns from the scope calling #eval when evaluating 'return'" do
lambda { eval("return :eval") }.call.should == :eval
end
it "unwinds through a Proc-style closure and returns from a lambda-style closure in the closure chain" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_with_lambda.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,eval,f"
end
it "raises a LocalJumpError if there is no lambda-style closure in the chain" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_without_lambda.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,e,LocalJumpError,f"
end
end
|