1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140
|
/*
==============================================================================
This file is part of the JUCE library.
Copyright (c) 2017 - ROLI Ltd.
JUCE is an open source library subject to commercial or open-source
licensing.
The code included in this file is provided under the terms of the ISC license
http://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/isc-license. Permission
To use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any purpose with or
without fee is hereby granted provided that the above copyright notice and
this permission notice appear in all copies.
JUCE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, AND ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, ARE
DISCLAIMED.
==============================================================================
*/
namespace juce
{
//==============================================================================
/**
Embedding an instance of this class inside another class can be used as a low-overhead
way of detecting leaked instances.
This class keeps an internal static count of the number of instances that are
active, so that when the app is shutdown and the static destructors are called,
it can check whether there are any left-over instances that may have been leaked.
To use it, use the JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR macro as a simple way to put one in your
class declaration. Have a look through the juce codebase for examples, it's used
in most of the classes.
@tags{Core}
*/
template <class OwnerClass>
class LeakedObjectDetector
{
public:
//==============================================================================
LeakedObjectDetector() noexcept { ++(getCounter().numObjects); }
LeakedObjectDetector (const LeakedObjectDetector&) noexcept { ++(getCounter().numObjects); }
~LeakedObjectDetector()
{
if (--(getCounter().numObjects) < 0)
{
DBG ("*** Dangling pointer deletion! Class: " << getLeakedObjectClassName());
/** If you hit this, then you've managed to delete more instances of this class than you've
created.. That indicates that you're deleting some dangling pointers.
Note that although this assertion will have been triggered during a destructor, it might
not be this particular deletion that's at fault - the incorrect one may have happened
at an earlier point in the program, and simply not been detected until now.
Most errors like this are caused by using old-fashioned, non-RAII techniques for
your object management. Tut, tut. Always, always use std::unique_ptrs, OwnedArrays,
ReferenceCountedObjects, etc, and avoid the 'delete' operator at all costs!
*/
jassertfalse;
}
}
private:
//==============================================================================
class LeakCounter
{
public:
LeakCounter() noexcept {}
~LeakCounter()
{
if (numObjects.value > 0)
{
DBG ("*** Leaked objects detected: " << numObjects.value << " instance(s) of class " << getLeakedObjectClassName());
/** If you hit this, then you've leaked one or more objects of the type specified by
the 'OwnerClass' template parameter - the name should have been printed by the line above.
If you're leaking, it's probably because you're using old-fashioned, non-RAII techniques for
your object management. Tut, tut. Always, always use std::unique_ptrs, OwnedArrays,
ReferenceCountedObjects, etc, and avoid the 'delete' operator at all costs!
*/
jassertfalse;
}
}
Atomic<int> numObjects;
};
static const char* getLeakedObjectClassName()
{
return OwnerClass::getLeakedObjectClassName();
}
static LeakCounter& getCounter() noexcept
{
static LeakCounter counter;
return counter;
}
};
//==============================================================================
#if DOXYGEN || ! defined (JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR)
#if (DOXYGEN || JUCE_CHECK_MEMORY_LEAKS)
/** This macro lets you embed a leak-detecting object inside a class.
To use it, simply declare a JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR(YourClassName) inside a private section
of the class declaration. E.g.
@code
class MyClass
{
public:
MyClass();
void blahBlah();
private:
JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR (MyClass)
};
@endcode
@see JUCE_DECLARE_NON_COPYABLE_WITH_LEAK_DETECTOR, LeakedObjectDetector
*/
#define JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR(OwnerClass) \
friend class juce::LeakedObjectDetector<OwnerClass>; \
static const char* getLeakedObjectClassName() noexcept { return #OwnerClass; } \
juce::LeakedObjectDetector<OwnerClass> JUCE_JOIN_MACRO (leakDetector, __LINE__);
#else
#define JUCE_LEAK_DETECTOR(OwnerClass)
#endif
#endif
} // namespace juce
|