File: README

package info (click to toggle)
libcps-perl 0.18-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye, buster, sid, stretch
  • size: 252 kB
  • ctags: 31
  • sloc: perl: 977; makefile: 2
file content (347 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 12,826 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
NAME
    `CPS' - manage flow of control in Continuation-Passing Style

OVERVIEW
    The functions in this module implement or assist the writing of
    programs, or parts of them, in Continuation Passing Style (CPS).
    Briefly, CPS is a style of writing code where the normal call/return
    mechanism is replaced by explicit "continuations", values passed in to
    functions which they should invoke, to implement return behaviour. For
    more detail on CPS, see the SEE ALSO section.

    What this module implements is not in fact true CPS, as Perl does not
    natively support the idea of a real continuation (such as is created by
    a co-routine). Furthermore, for CPS to be efficient in languages that
    natively support it, their runtimes typically implement a lot of
    optimisation of CPS code, which the Perl interpreter would be unable to
    perform. Instead, CODE references are passed around to stand in their
    place. While not particularly useful for most regular cases, this
    becomes very useful whenever some form of asynchronous or event-based
    programming is being used. Continuations passed in to the body function
    of a control structure can be stored in the event handlers of the
    asynchronous or event-driven framework, so that when they are invoked
    later, the code continues, eventually arriving at its final answer at
    some point in the future.

    In order for these examples to make sense, a fictional and simple
    asynchronisation framework has been invented. The exact details of
    operation should not be important, as it simply stands to illustrate the
    point. I hope its general intention should be obvious. :)

     read_stdin_line( \&on_line ); # wait on a line from STDIN, then pass it
                                   # to the handler function

    This module itself provides functions that manage the flow of control
    through a continuation passing program. They do not directly facilitate
    the flow of data through a program. That can be managed by lexical
    variables captured by the closures passed around. See the EXAMPLES
    section.

    For CPS versions of data-flow functionals, such as `map' and `grep', see
    also CPS::Functional.

SYNOPSIS
     use CPS qw( kloop );

     kloop( sub {
        my ( $knext, $klast ) = @_;

        print "Enter a number, or q to quit: ";

        read_stdin_line( sub {
           my ( $first ) = @_;
           chomp $first;

           return $klast->() if $first eq "q";

           print "Enter a second number: ";

           read_stdin_line( sub {
              my ( $second ) = @_;

              print "The sum is " . ( $first + $second ) . "\n";

              $knext->();
           } );
        } );
     },
     sub { exit }
     );

FUNCTIONS
    In all of the following functions, the `\&body' function can provide
    results by invoking its continuation / one of its continuations, either
    synchronously or asynchronously at some point later (via some event
    handling or other mechanism); the next invocation of `\&body' will not
    take place until the previous one exits if it is done synchronously.

    They all take the prefix `k' before the name of the regular perl keyword
    or function they aim to replace. It is common in CPS code in other
    languages, such as Scheme or Haskell, to store a continuation in a
    variable called `k'. This convention is followed here.

  kloop( \&body, $k )
    CPS version of perl's `while(true)' loop. Repeatedly calls the `body'
    code until it indicates the end of the loop, then invoke `$k'.

     $body->( $knext, $klast )
        $knext->()
        $klast->()

     $k->()

    If `$knext' is invoked, the body will be called again. If `$klast' is
    invoked, the continuation `$k' is invoked.

  kwhile( \&body, $k )
    Compatibility synonym for `kloop'; it was renamed after version 0.10.
    New code should use `kloop' instead.

  kforeach( \@items, \&body, $k )
    CPS version of perl's `foreach' loop. Calls the `body' code once for
    each element in `@items', until either the items are exhausted or the
    `body' invokes its `$klast' continuation, then invoke `$k'.

     $body->( $item, $knext, $klast )
        $knext->()
        $klast->()

     $k->()

  kdescendd( $root, \&body, $k )
    CPS version of recursive descent on a tree-like structure, defined by a
    function, `body', which when given a node in the tree, yields a list of
    child nodes.

     $body->( $node, $kmore )
        $kmore->( @child_nodes )

     $k->()

    The first value to be passed into `body' is `$root'.

    At each iteration, a node is given to the `body' function, and it is
    expected to pass a list of child nodes into its `$kmore' continuation.
    These will then be iterated over, in the order given. The tree-like
    structure is visited depth-first, descending fully into one subtree of a
    node before moving on to the next.

    This function does not provide a way for the body to accumulate a
    resultant data structure to pass into its own continuation. The body is
    executed simply for its side-effects and its continuation is invoked
    with no arguments. A variable of some sort should be shared between the
    body and the continuation if this is required.

  kdescendb( $root, \&body, $k )
    A breadth-first variation of `kdescendd'. This function visits each
    child node of the parent, before iterating over all of these nodes's
    children, recursively until the bottom of the tree.

  kpar( @bodies, $k )
    This CPS function takes a list of function bodies and calls them all
    immediately. Each is given its own continuation. Once every body has
    invoked its continuation, the main continuation `$k' is invoked.

     $body->( $kdone )
       $kdone->()

     $k->()

    This allows running multiple operations in parallel, and waiting for
    them all to complete before continuing. It provides in a CPS form
    functionality similar to that provided in a more object-oriented fashion
    by modules such as Async::MergePoint or Event::Join.

  kpareach( \@items, \&body, $k )
    This CPS function takes a list of items and a function body, and calls
    the body immediately once for each item in the list. Each invocation is
    given its own continuation. Once every body has invoked its
    continuation, the main continuation `$k' is invoked.

     $body->( $item, $kdone )
       $kdone->()

     $k->()

    This is similar to `kforeach', except that the body is started
    concurrently for all items in the list list, rather than each item
    waiting for the previous to finish.

  kseq( @bodies, $k )
    This CPS function takes a list of function bodies and calls them each,
    one at a time in sequence. Each is given a continuation to invoke, which
    will cause the next body to be invoked. When the last body has invoked
    its continuation, the main continuation `$k' is invoked.

     $body->( $kdone )
       $kdone->()

     $k->()

    A benefit of this is that it allows a long operation that uses many
    continuation "pauses", to be written without code indenting further and
    further to the right. Another is that it allows easy skipping of
    conditional parts of a computation, which would otherwise be tricky to
    write in a CPS form. See the EXAMPLES section.

GOVERNORS
    All of the above functions are implemented using a loop which repeatedly
    calls the body function until some terminating condition. By controlling
    the way this loop re-invokes itself, a program can control the behaviour
    of the functions.

    For every one of the above functions, there also exists a variant which
    takes a CPS::Governor object as its first argument. These functions use
    the governor object to control their iteration.

     kloop( \&body, $k )
     gkloop( $gov, \&body, $k )

     kforeach( \@items, \&body, $k )
     gkforeach( $gov, \@items, \&body, $k )

     etc...

    In this way, other governor objects can be constructed which have
    different running properties; such as interleaving iterations of their
    loop with other IO activity in an event-driven framework, or giving
    rate-limitation control on the speed of iteration of the loop.

CPS UTILITIES
    These function names do not begin with `k' because they are not
    themselves CPS primatives, but may be useful in CPS-oriented code.

  $kfunc = liftk { BLOCK }
  $kfunc = liftk( \&func )
    Returns a new CODE reference to a CPS-wrapped version of the code block
    or passed CODE reference. When `$kfunc' is invoked, the function `&func'
    is called in list context, being passed all the arguments given to
    `$kfunc' apart from the last, expected to be its continuation. When
    `&func' returns, the result is passed into the continuation.

     $kfunc->( @func_args, $k )
        $k->( @func_ret )

    The following are equivalent

     print func( 1, 2, 3 );

     my $kfunc = liftk( \&func );
     $kfunc->( 1, 2, 3, sub { print @_ } );

    Note that the returned wrapper function only has one continuation slot
    in its arguments. It therefore cannot be used as the body for `kloop()',
    `kforeach()' or `kgenerate()', because these pass two continuations.
    There does not exist a "natural" way to lift a normal call/return
    function into a CPS function which requires more than one continuation,
    because there is no way to distinguish the different named returns.

  $func = dropk { BLOCK } $kfunc
  $func = dropk $waitfunc, $kfunc
    Returns a new CODE reference to a plain call/return version of the
    passed CPS-style CODE reference. When the returned ("dropped") function
    is called, it invokes the passed CPS function, then waits for it to
    invoke its continuation. When it does, the list that was passed to the
    continuation is returned by the dropped function. If called in scalar
    context, only the first value in the list is returned.

     $kfunc->( @func_args, $k )
        $k->( @func_ret )

     $waitfunc->()

     @func_ret = $func->( @func_args )

    Given the following trivial CPS function:

     $kadd = sub { $_[2]->( $_[0] + $_[1] ) };

    The following are equivalent

     $kadd->( 10, 20, sub { print "The total is $_[0]\n" } );

     $add = dropk { } $kadd;
     print "The total is ".$add->( 10, 20 )."\n";

    In the general case the CPS function hasn't yet invoked its continuation
    by the time it returns (such as would be the case when using any sort of
    asynchronisation or event-driven framework). For `dropk' to actually
    work in this situation, it requires a way to run the event framework, to
    cause it to process events until the continuation has been invoked.

    This is provided by the block, or the first passed CODE reference. When
    the returned function is invoked, it repeatedly calls the block or wait
    function, until the CPS function has invoked its continuation.

EXAMPLES
  Returning Data From Functions
    No facilities are provided directly to return data from CPS body
    functions in `kloop', `kpar' and `kseq'. Instead, normal lexical
    variable capture may be used here.

     my $bat;
     my $ball;

     kpar(
        sub {
           my ( $k ) = @_;
           get_bat( on_bat => sub { $bat = shift; goto &$k } );
        },
        sub {
           my ( $k ) = @_;
           serve_ball( on_ball => sub { $ball = shift; goto &$k } );
        },

        sub {
           $bat->hit( $ball );
        },
     );

    The body function can set the value of a variable that it and its final
    continuation both capture.

  Using `kseq' For Conditionals
    Consider the call/return style of code

     A();
     if( $maybe ) {
        B();
     }
     C();

    We cannot easily write this in CPS form without naming C twice

     kA( sub {
        $maybe ?
           kB( sub { kC() } ) :
           kC();
     } );

    While not so problematic here, it could get awkward if C were in fact a
    large code block, or if more than a single conditional were employed in
    the logic; a likely scenario. A further issue is that the logical
    structure becomes much harder to read.

    Using `kseq' allows us to name the continuation so each arm of `kmaybe'
    can invoke it indirectly.

     kseq(
        \&kA,
        sub { my $k = shift; $maybe ? kB( $k ) : goto &$k; },
        \&kC
     );

SEE ALSO
    *   CPS::Functional - functional utilities in Continuation-Passing Style

    *   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation-passing_style on wikipedia

    *   Coro - co-routines in Perl

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Matt S. Trout (mst) <mst@shadowcat.co.uk> - for the inspiration of
    `kpareach' and with apologies to for naming of the said. ;)

AUTHOR
    Paul Evans <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk>