File: object-oriented

package info (click to toggle)
libdb2-ruby 0.5.4-1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sarge
  • size: 2,352 kB
  • ctags: 2,743
  • sloc: ansic: 11,156; ruby: 6,199; cpp: 6,064; makefile: 86; sh: 31
file content (26 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 986 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (18)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
<entry index='o'>
<name>Object-Oriented</name>
<reference>paradigm</reference>
<reference>object</reference>
<reference>japanese</reference>
<reference>inheritance</reference>
<reference>encapsulation</reference>
<reference>polymorphism</reference>
<reference>dynamic binding</reference>
<content>
    ((In Japanese|Japanese (language))),
    an adjective "Object-Oriented" has transcolored to an abstract noun,
    which means "the ((object|Object))-based ((paradigm|Paradigm))."

    Any kind of view looks OK at first
    as long as the object is the central concept,
    but in general, it seems that the ((paradigm|Paradigm)) needs
     * ((Inheritance)),
     * ((Encapsulation)),
     * and ((Polymorphism)) (or ((Dynamic Binding))).
    Someone deals it as a wild card or a kind of magic,
    but our life has a lot more.
    Twenty-odd years since the dawn, through all our fortunes,
    there comes to be a first stage of pragmatic use...perhaps...agreed?
</content>
</entry>