File: changelog

package info (click to toggle)
libjtds-java 1.2.5%2Bdfsg-1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: squeeze
  • size: 11,600 kB
  • ctags: 11,440
  • sloc: java: 39,523; xml: 704; sh: 34; makefile: 12
file content (43 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,716 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
libjtds-java (1.2.5+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Removed debian/patches/00-use-new-javax-net-packages.patch: included in
    upstream.
  * debian/rules: removed simple-patchsys.mk.
  * debian/rules, debian/control: require java 6, needed by new JDBC
    requirements.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version, no changes.
  * debian/doc-base: added doc-base index.

 -- Martín Ferrari <tincho@debian.org>  Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:59:03 +0100

libjtds-java (1.2.2+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=high

  * debian/control: fixed incorrect build-dependencies. Closes: #543062, which
    is RC, so urgency=high.
  * debian/control: added ${misc:Depends} to binary depends. Corrected section
    to `java'.
  * debian/watch: moved `-dfsg' processing to dversionmangle.

 -- Martín Ferrari <tincho@debian.org>  Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:57:58 +0200

libjtds-java (1.2.2+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Minor description improvements (capitalisation and trademarks).
  * debian/control: ant should be Build-Depends-Indep, correct Vcs-Browser
    path. Updated email address.

 -- Martín Ferrari <tincho@debian.org>  Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:47:51 -0300

libjtds-java (1.2.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial release. (Closes: #454564)
  * Heavily repackaged to remove upstream cruft: third party libraries, code
    without copyright, binaries, etc.
  * Compiled with a custom-made build.xml, as upstream version is not useful
    for us.
  * Patched src/main/net/sourceforge/jtds/ssl/SocketFactories.java to use the
    current (and vendor-neutral) javax.net packages.
  * Uploaded with DM-Upload-Allowed: yes.

 -- Martín Ferrari <martin.ferrari@gmail.com>  Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:36:35 -0300