1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;
=pod
This tests how well Moose type constraints
play with Test::Deep.
Its not as pretty as Declare::Constraints::Simple,
but it is not completely horrid either.
=cut
use Test::Needs 'Test::Deep'; # skip all if not installed
use Test::Fatal;
{
package Foo;
use Moose;
use Moose::Util::TypeConstraints;
use Test::Deep qw[
eq_deeply array_each subhashof ignore
];
# define your own type ...
type 'ArrayOfHashOfBarsAndRandomNumbers'
=> where {
eq_deeply($_,
array_each(
subhashof({
bar => Test::Deep::isa('Bar'),
random_number => ignore()
})
)
)
};
has 'bar' => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'ArrayOfHashOfBarsAndRandomNumbers',
);
package Bar;
use Moose;
}
my $array_of_hashes = [
{ bar => Bar->new, random_number => 10 },
{ bar => Bar->new },
];
my $foo;
is( exception {
$foo = Foo->new('bar' => $array_of_hashes);
}, undef, '... construction succeeded' );
isa_ok($foo, 'Foo');
is_deeply($foo->bar, $array_of_hashes, '... got our value correctly');
isnt( exception {
$foo->bar({});
}, undef, '... validation failed correctly' );
isnt( exception {
$foo->bar([{ foo => 3 }]);
}, undef, '... validation failed correctly' );
done_testing;
|
