1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375
|
Coding conventions in the libssh tree
======================================
===========
Quick Start
===========
Coding style guidelines are about reducing the number of unnecessary
reformatting patches and making things easier for developers to work together.
You don't have to like them or even agree with them, but once put in place we
all have to abide by them (or vote to change them). However, coding style
should never outweigh coding itself and so the guidelines described here are
hopefully easy enough to follow as they are very common and supported by tools
and editors.
The basic style for C code, is the Linux kernel coding style (See
Documentation/CodingStyle in the kernel source tree). This closely matches what
libssh developers use already anyways, with a few exceptions as mentioned
below.
But to save you the trouble of reading the Linux kernel style guide, here
are the highlights.
* Maximum Line Width is 80 Characters
The reason is not about people with low-res screens but rather sticking
to 80 columns prevents you from easily nesting more than one level of
if statements or other code blocks.
* Use 4 Spaces to Indent
* No Trailing Whitespace
Clean up your files before committing.
* Follow the K&R guidelines. We won't go through all of them here. Do you
have a copy of "The C Programming Language" anyways right?
=============
Editor Hints
=============
Emacs
------
Add the follow to your $HOME/.emacs file:
(add-hook 'c-mode-hook
(lambda ()
(c-set-style "linux")
(c-toggle-auto-state)))
Vim
----
For the basic vi editor included with all variants of \*nix, add the
following to $HOME/.vimrc:
set ts=4 sw=4 et cindent
You can use the Vim gitmodline plugin to store this in the git config:
http://git.cryptomilk.org/projects/vim-gitmodeline.git/
For Vim, the following settings in $HOME/.vimrc will also deal with
displaying trailing whitespace:
if has("syntax") && (&t_Co > 2 || has("gui_running"))
syntax on
function! ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
syntax match TrailingSpace "[ \t]\+$" display containedin=ALL
highlight TrailingSpace ctermbg=Red
endf
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead * call ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
endif
" Show tabs, trailing whitespace, and continued lines visually
set list listchars=tab:»·,trail:·,extends:…
" highlight overly long lines same as TODOs.
set textwidth=80
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead *.c,*.h exec 'match Todo /\%>' . &textwidth . 'v.\+/'
==========================
FAQ & Statement Reference
==========================
Comments
---------
Comments should always use the standard C syntax. C++ style comments are not
currently allowed.
The lines before a comment should be empty. If the comment directly belongs to
the following code, there should be no empty line after the comment, except if
the comment contains a summary of multiple following code blocks.
This is good:
...
int i;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* which explains the logical steps we have to do:
*
* 1. We need to set i=5, because...
* 2. We need to call complex_fn1
*/
/* This is a one line comment about i = 5. */
i = 5;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* explaining the call to complex_fn1()
*/
ret = complex_fn1();
if (ret != 0) {
...
/**
* @brief This is a doxygen comment.
*
* This is a more detailed explanation of
* this simple function.
*
* @param[in] param1 The parameter value of the function.
*
* @param[out] result1 The result value of the function.
*
* @return 0 on success and -1 on error.
*/
int example(int param1, int *result1);
This is bad:
...
int i;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* which explains the logical steps we have to do:
*
* 1. We need to set i=5, because...
* 2. We need to call complex_fn1
*/
/* This is a one line comment about i = 5. */
i = 5;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* explaining the call to complex_fn1()
*/
ret = complex_fn1();
if (ret != 0) {
...
/*This is a one line comment.*/
/* This is a multi line comment,
with some more words...*/
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* with some more words...*/
Indention & Whitespace & 80 columns
------------------------------------
To avoid confusion, indentations have to be 4 spaces. Do not use tabs!. When
wrapping parameters for function calls, align the parameter list with the first
parameter on the previous line. For example,
var1 = foo(arg1,
arg2,
arg3);
The previous example is intended to illustrate alignment of function
parameters across lines and not as encourage for gratuitous line
splitting. Never split a line before columns 70 - 79 unless you
have a really good reason. Be smart about formatting.
If, switch, & Code blocks
--------------------------
Always follow an 'if' keyword with a space but don't include additional
spaces following or preceding the parentheses in the conditional.
This is good:
if (x == 1)
This is bad:
if ( x == 1 )
or
if (x==1)
Yes we have a lot of code that uses the second and third form and we are trying
to clean it up without being overly intrusive.
Note that this is a rule about parentheses following keywords and not
functions. Don't insert a space between the name and left parentheses when
invoking functions.
Braces for code blocks used by for, if, switch, while, do..while, etc. should
begin on the same line as the statement keyword and end on a line of their own.
You should always include braces, even if the block only contains one
statement. NOTE: Functions are different and the beginning left brace should
be located in the first column on the next line.
If the beginning statement has to be broken across lines due to length, the
beginning brace should be on a line of its own.
The exception to the ending rule is when the closing brace is followed by
another language keyword such as else or the closing while in a do..while loop.
Good examples:
if (x == 1) {
printf("good\n");
}
for (x = 1; x < 10; x++) {
print("%d\n", x);
}
for (really_really_really_really_long_var_name = 0;
really_really_really_really_long_var_name < 10;
really_really_really_really_long_var_name++)
{
print("%d\n", really_really_really_really_long_var_name);
}
do {
printf("also good\n");
} while (1);
Bad examples:
while (1)
{
print("I'm in a loop!\n"); }
for (x=1;
x<10;
x++)
{
print("no good\n");
}
if (i < 10)
print("I should be in braces.\n");
Goto
-----
While many people have been academically taught that "goto"s are fundamentally
evil, they can greatly enhance readability and reduce memory leaks when used as
the single exit point from a function. But in no libssh world what so ever is a
goto outside of a function or block of code a good idea.
Good Examples:
int function foo(int y)
{
int *z = NULL;
int rc = 0;
if (y < 10) {
z = malloc(sizeof(int)*y);
if (z == NULL) {
rc = 1;
goto done;
}
}
print("Allocated %d elements.\n", y);
done:
if (z != NULL) {
free(z);
}
return rc;
}
Initialize pointers
-------------------
All pointer variables MUST be initialized to NULL. History has
demonstrated that uninitialized pointer variables have lead to various
bugs and security issues.
Pointers MUST be initialized even if the assignment directly follows
the declaration, like pointer2 in the example below, because the
instructions sequence may change over time.
Good Example:
char *pointer1 = NULL;
char *pointer2 = NULL;
pointer2 = some_func2();
...
pointer1 = some_func1();
Typedefs
---------
libssh tries to avoid "typedef struct { .. } x_t;" so we do always try to use
"struct x { .. };". We know there are still such typedefs in the code, but for
new code, please don't do that anymore.
Make use of helper variables
-----------------------------
Please try to avoid passing function calls as function parameters in new code.
This makes the code much easier to read and it's also easier to use the "step"
command within gdb.
Good Example:
char *name;
name = get_some_name();
if (name == NULL) {
...
}
rc = some_function_my_name(name);
...
Bad Example:
rc = some_function_my_name(get_some_name());
...
Please try to avoid passing function return values to if- or while-conditions.
The reason for this is better handling of code under a debugger.
Good example:
x = malloc(sizeof(short) * 10);
if (x == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
}
Bad example:
if ((x = malloc(sizeof(short)*10)) == NULL ) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
}
There are exceptions to this rule. One example is walking a data structure in
an iterator style:
while ((opt = poptGetNextOpt(pc)) != -1) {
... do something with opt ...
}
But in general, please try to avoid this pattern.
Control-Flow changing macros
-----------------------------
Macros like STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN that change control flow (return/goto/etc)
from within the macro are considered bad, because they look like function calls
that never change control flow. Please do not introduce them.
|