File: 06_spelling.diff

package info (click to toggle)
libxml-twig-perl 1%3A3.34-1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: squeeze
  • size: 2,036 kB
  • ctags: 806
  • sloc: perl: 18,640; xml: 202; makefile: 18
file content (58 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,142 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
--- ../orig/libxml-twig-perl-3.34/Twig.pm	2010-01-18 17:26:34.000000000 +0100
+++ d/Twig.pm	2010-02-13 19:38:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -11093,7 +11093,7 @@
 
   if( $elt->{first_child} && $elt->{first_child}->passes( 'title')) 
 
-C<first_child_is> is an other name for this method
+C<first_child_is> is another name for this method
 
 Similar methods are available for the other navigation methods: 
 
@@ -12433,7 +12433,7 @@
 
 =item outer_xml
 
-An other synonym for sprint
+Another synonym for sprint
 
 =item xml_text 
 
@@ -13153,7 +13153,7 @@
 the output for example. As it does not stick to the DOM, is also usually leads 
 to shorter code than in XML::LibXML.
 
-Beyond the pure features of the 2 modules, XML::LibXML seems to be prefered by
+Beyond the pure features of the 2 modules, XML::LibXML seems to be preferred by
 "XML-purists", while XML::Twig seems to be more used by Perl Hackers who have 
 to deal with XML. As you have noted, XML::Twig also comes with quite a lot of 
 docs, but I am sure if you ask for help about XML::LibXML here or on Perlmonks
--- ../orig/libxml-twig-perl-3.34/Twig_pm.slow	2010-01-18 17:20:18.000000000 +0100
+++ d/Twig_pm.slow	2010-02-13 20:08:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -11096,7 +11096,7 @@
 
   if( $elt->first_child && $elt->first_child->passes( 'title')) 
 
-C<first_child_is> is an other name for this method
+C<first_child_is> is another name for this method
 
 Similar methods are available for the other navigation methods: 
 
@@ -12436,7 +12436,7 @@
 
 =item outer_xml
 
-An other synonym for sprint
+Another synonym for sprint
 
 =item xml_text 
 
@@ -13156,7 +13156,7 @@
 the output for example. As it does not stick to the DOM, is also usually leads 
 to shorter code than in XML::LibXML.
 
-Beyond the pure features of the 2 modules, XML::LibXML seems to be prefered by
+Beyond the pure features of the 2 modules, XML::LibXML seems to be preferred by
 "XML-purists", while XML::Twig seems to be more used by Perl Hackers who have 
 to deal with XML. As you have noted, XML::Twig also comes with quite a lot of 
 docs, but I am sure if you ask for help about XML::LibXML here or on Perlmonks