File: MP%2Bfencewmbonceonce%2Bfencermbonceonce.litmus

package info (click to toggle)
linux 6.1.137-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 1,496,408 kB
  • sloc: ansic: 23,468,339; asm: 266,595; sh: 110,522; makefile: 49,887; python: 36,990; perl: 36,834; cpp: 6,056; yacc: 4,908; lex: 2,725; awk: 1,440; ruby: 25; sed: 5
file content (30 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 545 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (32)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
C MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce

(*
 * Result: Never
 *
 * This litmus test demonstrates that smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() provide
 * sufficient ordering for the message-passing pattern.  However, it
 * is usually better to use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
 *)

{}

P0(int *buf, int *flag) // Producer
{
	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
	smp_wmb();
	WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
}

P1(int *buf, int *flag) // Consumer
{
	int r0;
	int r1;

	r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
	smp_rmb();
	r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}

exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)