1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
namespace dr2229 { // dr2229: 7
struct AnonBitfieldQualifiers {
const unsigned : 1; // expected-error {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}}
volatile unsigned : 1; // expected-error {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}}
const volatile unsigned : 1; // expected-error {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}}
unsigned : 1;
const unsigned i1 : 1;
volatile unsigned i2 : 1;
const volatile unsigned i3 : 1;
};
}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
namespace dr2211 { // dr2211: 8
void f() {
int a;
auto f = [a](int a) { (void)a; }; // expected-error {{a lambda parameter cannot shadow an explicitly captured entity}}
// expected-note@-1{{variable 'a' is explicitly captured here}}
auto g = [=](int a) { (void)a; };
}
}
#endif
namespace dr2292 { // dr2292: 9
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
template<typename T> using id = T;
void test(int *p) {
p->template id<int>::~id<int>();
}
#endif
}
namespace dr2233 { // dr2233: 11
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
template <typename... T>
void f(int i = 0, T... args) {}
template <typename... T>
void g(int i = 0, T... args, T... args2) {}
template <typename... T>
void h(int i = 0, T... args, int j = 1) {}
template <typename... T, typename... U>
void i(int i = 0, T... args, int j = 1, U... args2) {}
template <class... Ts>
void j(int i = 0, Ts... ts) {}
template <>
void j<int>(int i, int j) {}
template
void j(int, int, int);
extern template
void j(int, int, int, int);
// PR23029
// Ensure instantiating the templates works.
void use() {
f();
f(0, 1);
f<int>(1, 2);
g<int>(1, 2, 3);
h(0, 1);
i();
i(3);
i<int>(3, 2);
i<int>(3, 2, 1);
i<int, int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
j();
j(1);
j(1, 2);
j<int>(1, 2);
}
namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
template<typename ...T> struct A {
template <T... V> void f(int i = 0, int (&... arr)[V]);
};
template<> template<>
void A<int, int>::f<1, 1>(int i, int (&arr1a)[1], int (&arr2a)[1]) {}
// FIXME: I believe this example is valid, at least up to the first explicit
// specialization, but Clang can't cope with explicit specializations that
// expand packs into a sequence of parameters. If we ever start accepting
// that, we'll need to decide whether it's OK for arr1a to be missing its
// default argument -- how far back do we look when determining whether a
// parameter was expanded from a pack?
// -- zygoloid 2020-06-02
template<typename ...T> struct B {
template <T... V> void f(int i = 0, int (&... arr)[V]);
};
template<> template<int a, int b>
void B<int, int>::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {} // expected-error {{does not match}}
template<> template<>
void B<int, int>::f<1, 1>(int i, int (&arr1a)[1], int (&arr2a)[1]) {}
}
namespace CheckAfterMerging1 {
template <typename... T> void f() {
void g(int, int = 0);
void g(int = 0, T...);
g();
}
void h() { f<int>(); }
}
namespace CheckAfterMerging2 {
template <typename... T> void f() {
void g(int = 0, T...);
void g(int, int = 0);
g();
}
void h() { f<int>(); }
}
#endif
} // namespace dr2233
|
