File: arm64-regress-f128csel-flags.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-13 1%3A13.0.1-11
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 1,418,840 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 5,290,826; ansic: 996,570; asm: 544,593; python: 188,212; objc: 72,027; lisp: 30,291; f90: 25,395; sh: 24,898; javascript: 9,780; pascal: 9,398; perl: 7,484; ml: 5,432; awk: 3,523; makefile: 2,913; xml: 953; cs: 573; fortran: 539
file content (27 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 950 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (29) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
 
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm64-eabi -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s

; We used to not mark NZCV as being used in the continuation basic-block
; when lowering a 128-bit "select" to branches. This meant a subsequent use
; of the same flags gave an internal fault here.

declare void @foo(fp128)

define double @test_f128csel_flags(i32 %lhs, fp128 %a, fp128 %b, double %l, double %r) nounwind {
; CHECK: test_f128csel_flags

    %tst = icmp ne i32 %lhs, 42
    %val = select i1 %tst, fp128 %a, fp128 %b
; CHECK: cmp w0, #42
; CHECK: b.eq {{.?LBB0}}

    call void @foo(fp128 %val)
    %retval = select i1 %tst, double %l, double %r

    ; It's also reasonably important that the actual fcsel comes before the
    ; function call since bl may corrupt NZCV. We were doing the right thing anyway,
    ; but just as well test it while we're here.
; CHECK: fcsel {{d[0-9]+}}, {{d[0-9]+}}, {{d[0-9]+}}, ne
; CHECK: bl {{_?foo}}

    ret double %retval
}