File: invariant_load_canonicalize_array_baseptrs_5.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-13 1%3A13.0.1-11
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 1,418,840 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 5,290,826; ansic: 996,570; asm: 544,593; python: 188,212; objc: 72,027; lisp: 30,291; f90: 25,395; sh: 24,898; javascript: 9,780; pascal: 9,398; perl: 7,484; ml: 5,432; awk: 3,523; makefile: 2,913; xml: 953; cs: 573; fortran: 539
file content (78 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,853 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (13)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-scops -analyze < %s \
; RUN:  -polly-invariant-load-hoisting \
; RUN:  | FileCheck %s

; Verify that nested arrays with invariant base pointers are handled correctly.
; Specifically, we currently do not canonicalize arrays where some accesses are
; hoisted as invariant loads. If we would, we need to update the access function
; of the invariant loads as well. However, as this is not a very common
; situation, we leave this for now to avoid further complexity increases.
;
; In this test case the arrays baseA1 and baseA2 could be canonicalized to a
; single array, but there is also an invariant access to baseA1[0] through
; "%v0 = load float, float* %ptr" which prevents the canonicalization.

; CHECK:      Invariant Accesses: {
; CHECK-NEXT:         ReadAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body2[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         Execution Context: {  :  }
; CHECK-NEXT:         ReadAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] -> MemRef_baseA1[0] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         Execution Context: {  :  }
; CHECK-NEXT: }

; CHECK:      Statements {
; CHECK-NEXT: 	Stmt_body1
; CHECK-NEXT:         Domain :=
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 1021 };
; CHECK-NEXT:         Schedule :=
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] -> [i0, 0] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         ReadAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] -> MemRef_baseA1[1 + i0] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         MustWriteAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] -> MemRef_B[0] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         MustWriteAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body1[i0] -> MemRef_B[0] };
; CHECK-NEXT: 	Stmt_body2
; CHECK-NEXT:         Domain :=
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body2[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 1021 };
; CHECK-NEXT:         Schedule :=
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body2[i0] -> [i0, 1] };
; CHECK-NEXT:         MustWriteAccess :=	[Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
; CHECK-NEXT:             { Stmt_body2[i0] -> MemRef_baseA2[0] };
; CHECK-NEXT: }

define void @foo(float** %A, float* %B) {
start:
  br label %loop

loop:
  %indvar = phi i64 [1, %start], [%indvar.next, %latch]
  %indvar.next = add nsw i64 %indvar, 1
  %icmp = icmp slt i64 %indvar.next, 1024
  br i1 %icmp, label %body1, label %exit

body1:
  %baseA1 = load float*, float** %A
  %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %baseA1, i64 %indvar
  %v0 = load float, float* %ptr
  %v1 = load float, float* %baseA1
  store float %v0, float* %B
  store float %v1, float* %B
  br label %body2

body2:
  %baseA2 = load float*, float** %A
  store float undef, float* %baseA2
  br label %body3

body3:
  br label %latch

latch:
  br label %loop

exit:
  ret void

}