File: pr11985.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-13 1%3A13.0.1-6~deb11u1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 1,418,812 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 5,290,827; ansic: 996,570; asm: 544,593; python: 188,212; objc: 72,027; lisp: 30,291; f90: 25,395; sh: 24,900; javascript: 9,780; pascal: 9,398; perl: 7,484; ml: 5,432; awk: 3,523; makefile: 2,892; xml: 953; cs: 573; fortran: 539
file content (35 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,364 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (10)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux -mcpu=nocona | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PRESCOTT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux -mcpu=nehalem | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NEHALEM

;;; TODO: (1) Some of the loads and stores are certainly unaligned and (2) the first load and first
;;; store overlap with the second load and second store respectively.
;;;
;;; Is either of these sequences ideal? 

define float @foo(i8* nocapture %buf, float %a, float %b) nounwind uwtable {
; PRESCOTT-LABEL: foo:
; PRESCOTT:       # %bb.0: # %entry
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   .Ltmp0+14(%rip), %rax
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   %rax, 14(%rdi)
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   .Ltmp0+8(%rip), %rax
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   %rax, 8(%rdi)
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   .Ltmp0(%rip), %rax
; PRESCOTT-NEXT:    movq   %rax, (%rdi)
;
; NEHALEM-LABEL: foo:
; NEHALEM:       # %bb.0: # %entry
; NEHALEM-NEXT:    movq .Ltmp0+14(%rip), %rax
; NEHALEM-NEXT:    movq %rax, 14(%rdi)
; NEHALEM-NEXT:    movups .Ltmp0(%rip), %xmm2
; NEHALEM-NEXT:    movups %xmm2, (%rdi)

entry:
  tail call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %buf, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %out), i64 22, i1 false)
  br label %out

out:                                              ; preds = %entry
  %add = fadd float %a, %b
  ret float %add
}

declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture, i8* nocapture, i64, i1) nounwind