File: dag-combine-insert-subvector.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-14 1%3A14.0.6-12
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 1,496,180 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 5,593,972; ansic: 986,872; asm: 585,869; python: 184,223; objc: 72,530; lisp: 31,119; f90: 27,793; javascript: 9,780; pascal: 9,762; sh: 9,482; perl: 7,468; ml: 5,432; awk: 3,523; makefile: 2,538; xml: 953; cs: 573; fortran: 567
file content (25 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,397 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (6)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null

; This regression test is defending against a use of the wrong interface
; (EVT::getVectorNumElements()) for a scalable vector. This issue
; appeared in DAGCombiner::visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR because of the use of
; getVectorNumElements() on scalable types.

target triple = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"
attributes #0 = {"target-features"="+sve"}

declare <16 x float> @llvm.experimental.vector.extract.v16f32.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float>, i64)
declare <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double>, <8 x double>, i64)

define <vscale x 2 x double> @reproducer_one(<vscale x 4 x float> %vec_a) #0 {
  %a = call <16 x float> @llvm.experimental.vector.extract.v16f32.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float> %vec_a, i64 0)
  %b = bitcast <16 x float> %a to <8 x double>
  %retval = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <8 x double> %b, i64 0)
  ret <vscale x 2 x double> %retval
}

define <vscale x 2 x double> @reproducer_two(<4 x double> %a, <4 x double> %b) #0 {
  %concat = shufflevector <4 x double> %a, <4 x double> %b, <8 x i32> <i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
  %retval = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <8 x double> %concat, i64 0)
  ret <vscale x 2 x double> %retval
}