File: catch-implicit-conversions-basics-negatives.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-16 1%3A16.0.6-15~deb11u2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 1,634,820 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,179,261; ansic: 1,216,205; asm: 741,319; python: 196,614; objc: 75,325; f90: 49,640; lisp: 32,396; pascal: 12,286; sh: 9,394; perl: 7,442; ml: 5,494; awk: 3,523; makefile: 2,723; javascript: 1,206; xml: 886; fortran: 581; cs: 573
file content (12 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 752 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (21) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=implicit-unsigned-integer-truncation,implicit-signed-integer-truncation,implicit-integer-sign-change -fsanitize-recover=implicit-unsigned-integer-truncation,implicit-signed-integer-truncation,implicit-integer-sign-change -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_implicit_conversion"

// If we have an enum, it will be promoted to an unsigned integer.
// But both types are unsigned, and have same bitwidth.
// So we should not emit any sanitization. Also, for inc/dec we currently assume
// (assert) that we will only have cases where at least one of the types
// is signed, which isn't the case here.
typedef enum { a } b;
b t0(b c) {
  c--;
  return c;
}