1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
; RUN: opt -passes=early-cse -earlycse-debug-hash -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='early-cse<memssa>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; Can we CSE a known condition to a constant?
define i1 @test(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test
entry:
%cnd1 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
taken:
; CHECK-LABEL: taken:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
%cnd2 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
ret i1 %cnd2
untaken:
; CHECK-LABEL: untaken:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
%cnd3 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
ret i1 %cnd3
}
; We can CSE the condition, but we *don't* know it's value after the merge
define i1 @test_neg1(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_neg1
entry:
%cnd1 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
taken:
br label %merge
untaken:
br label %merge
merge:
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
%cnd3 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
ret i1 %cnd3
}
; Check specifically for a case where we have a unique predecessor, but
; not a single predecessor. We can not know the value of the condition here.
define i1 @test_neg2(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_neg2
entry:
%cnd1 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd1, label %merge, label %merge
merge:
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
%cnd3 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
ret i1 %cnd3
}
; Replace a use rather than CSE
define i1 @test2(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
entry:
%cnd = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd, label %taken, label %untaken
taken:
; CHECK-LABEL: taken:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
ret i1 %cnd
untaken:
; CHECK-LABEL: untaken:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
ret i1 %cnd
}
; Not legal to replace use given it's not dominated by edge
define i1 @test2_neg1(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2_neg1
entry:
%cnd1 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
taken:
br label %merge
untaken:
br label %merge
merge:
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
ret i1 %cnd1
}
; Another single predecessor test, but for dominated use
define i1 @test2_neg2(ptr %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2_neg2
entry:
%cnd1 = icmp eq ptr %p, null
br i1 %cnd1, label %merge, label %merge
merge:
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
ret i1 %cnd1
}
|
