1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -w -analyzer-checker=core.DivideZero -analyzer-output=text -verify %s
// This test file verifies the "Assuming..." diagnostic pieces that are being
// reported when the branch condition was too complicated to explain.
// Therefore, if your change replaces the generic "Assuming the condition is
// true" with a more specific message, causing this test to fail, the condition
// should be replaced with a more complicated condition that we still cannot
// properly explain to the user. Once we reach the point at which all conditions
// are "diagnosable", this test (or this note) should probably be removed,
// together with the code section that handles generic messages for
// non-diagnosable conditions.
// Function calls are currently non-diagnosable.
int non_diagnosable(void);
void test_true(void) {
if (non_diagnosable()) {
// expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is true}}
// expected-note@-2{{Taking true branch}}
1 / 0;
// expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
// expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
}
}
void test_false(void) {
if (non_diagnosable()) {
// expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-2{{Taking false branch}}
} else {
1 / 0;
// expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
// expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
}
}
// Test that we're still reporting that the condition is true,
// when we encounter an exclamation mark (used to be broken).
void test_exclamation_mark(void) {
if (!non_diagnosable()) {
// expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is true}}
// expected-note@-2{{Taking true branch}}
1 / 0;
// expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
// expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
}
}
|
