File: optimization-remark-new-pm.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,998,520 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (20 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 964 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (13) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
 
// Verify that remarks for the inliner appear. The remarks under the new PM will
// be slightly different than those emitted by the legacy PM. The new PM inliner
// also does not appear to be added at O0, so we test at O1.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -emit-llvm-only -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -emit-llvm-only -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -verify

int foo(int x, int y) __attribute__((always_inline));
int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }

float foz(int x, int y) __attribute__((noinline));
float foz(int x, int y) { return x * y; }

// The negative diagnostics are emitted twice because the inliner runs
// twice.
//
int bar(int j) {
  // expected-remark@+2 {{'foz' not inlined into 'bar' because it should never be inlined (cost=never)}}
  // expected-remark@+1 {{'foo' inlined into 'bar'}}
  return foo(j, j - 2) * foz(j - 2, j);
}