File: bitint-bitfield-promote.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,998,520 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (54 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,292 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (7)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s

// GH87641 noticed that integer promotion of a bit-field of bit-precise integer
// type was promoting to int rather than the type of the bit-field.
struct S {
  unsigned _BitInt(7) x : 2;
  unsigned _BitInt(2) y : 2;
  unsigned _BitInt(72) z : 28;
  _BitInt(31) a : 12;
  _BitInt(33) b : 33;
};

// We don't have to worry about promotion cases where the bit-precise type is
// smaller than the width of the bit-field; that can't happen.
struct T {
  unsigned _BitInt(28) oh_no : 72; // expected-error {{width of bit-field 'oh_no' (72 bits) exceeds the width of its type (28 bits)}}
};

static_assert(
  _Generic(+(struct S){}.x,
    int : 0,
    unsigned _BitInt(7) : 1,
    unsigned _BitInt(2) : 2
  ) == 1);

static_assert(
  _Generic(+(struct S){}.y,
    int : 0,
    unsigned _BitInt(7) : 1,
    unsigned _BitInt(2) : 2
  ) == 2);

static_assert(
  _Generic(+(struct S){}.z,
    int : 0,
    unsigned _BitInt(72) : 1,
    unsigned _BitInt(28) : 2
  ) == 1);

static_assert(
  _Generic(+(struct S){}.a,
    int : 0,
    _BitInt(31) : 1,
    _BitInt(12) : 2,
    unsigned _BitInt(31) : 3
  ) == 1);

static_assert(
  _Generic(+(struct S){}.b,
    int : 0,
    long long : 1,
    _BitInt(33) : 2,
    unsigned _BitInt(33) : 3
  ) == 2);