File: subword.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,998,520 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (29 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 880 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (7) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
 
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=lanai-unknown-unknown | FileCheck %s

; Test scheduling of subwords.

%struct.X = type { i16, i16 }

define void @f(ptr inreg nocapture %c) #0 {
entry:
  %a = getelementptr inbounds %struct.X, ptr %c, i32 0, i32 0
  %0 = load i16, ptr %a, align 2
  %inc = add i16 %0, 1
  store i16 %inc, ptr %a, align 2
  %b = getelementptr inbounds %struct.X, ptr %c, i32 0, i32 1
  %1 = load i16, ptr %b, align 2
  %dec = add i16 %1, -1
  store i16 %dec, ptr %b, align 2
  ret void
}

; Verify that the two loads occur before the stores. Without memory
; disambiguation and subword schedule, the resultant code was a per subword
; load-modify-store sequence instead of the more optimal schedule where all
; loads occurred before modification and storage.
; CHECK:      uld.h
; CHECK-NEXT: uld.h
; CHECK-NEXT: add
; CHECK-NEXT: st.h
; CHECK-NEXT: sub
; CHECK-NEXT: st.h