File: vsetvli-regression.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,998,520 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (23 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,001 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (7) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
 
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+v | FileCheck %s

; This test checks a regression in the vsetvli insertion pass. We used to
; prserve the VL on the second vsetvli with ratio e32/m1, when the the last
; update of VL was the vsetvli with e64/m4. Changing VTYPE here changes VLMAX
; which may make the original VL invalid. Instead of preserving it we use 0.

define i32 @illegal_preserve_vl(<vscale x 2 x i32> %a, <vscale x 4 x i64> %x, ptr %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: illegal_preserve_vl:
; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli a1, zero, e64, m4, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT:    vadd.vv v12, v12, v12
; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli zero, zero, e32, m2, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT:    vmv.x.s a1, v8
; CHECK-NEXT:    vs4r.v v12, (a0)
; CHECK-NEXT:    mv a0, a1
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
  %index = add <vscale x 4 x i64> %x, %x
  store <vscale x 4 x i64> %index, ptr %y
  %elt = extractelement <vscale x 2 x i32> %a, i64 0
  ret i32 %elt
}