File: libunwind_02.pass.cpp

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3~deb12u1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 1,998,492 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (73 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,927 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (18)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
// -*- C++ -*-
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

// TODO: Figure out why this fails with Memory Sanitizer.
// XFAIL: msan

// This test fails on older llvm, when built with picolibc.
// XFAIL: clang-16 && LIBCXX-PICOLIBC-FIXME

#undef NDEBUG
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unwind.h>

#define EXPECTED_NUM_FRAMES 50
#define NUM_FRAMES_UPPER_BOUND 100

__attribute__((noinline)) _Unwind_Reason_Code callback(_Unwind_Context *context,
                                                       void *cnt) {
  (void)context;
  int *i = (int *)cnt;
  ++*i;
  if (*i > NUM_FRAMES_UPPER_BOUND) {
    abort();
  }
  return _URC_NO_REASON;
}

__attribute__((noinline)) void test_backtrace() {
  int n = 0;
  _Unwind_Backtrace(&callback, &n);
  if (n < EXPECTED_NUM_FRAMES) {
    abort();
  }
}

// These functions are effectively the same, but we have to be careful to avoid
// unwanted optimizations that would mess with the number of frames we expect.
// Surprisingly, slapping `noinline` is not sufficient -- we also have to avoid
// writing the function in a way that the compiler can easily spot tail
// recursion.
__attribute__((noinline)) int test1(int i);
__attribute__((noinline)) int test2(int i);

__attribute__((noinline)) int test1(int i) {
  if (i == 0) {
    test_backtrace();
    return 0;
  } else {
    return i + test2(i - 1);
  }
}

__attribute__((noinline)) int test2(int i) {
  if (i == 0) {
    test_backtrace();
    return 0;
  } else {
    return i + test1(i - 1);
  }
}

int main(int, char**) {
  int total = test1(50);
  assert(total == 1275);
  return 0;
}