File: simplifycfg-switch-lowering-vs-correlatedpropagation.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-19 1%3A19.1.7-3~deb12u1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm-proposed-updates
  • size: 1,998,492 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,951,680; ansic: 1,486,157; asm: 913,598; python: 232,024; f90: 80,126; objc: 75,281; lisp: 37,276; pascal: 16,990; sh: 10,009; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,724; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,167; javascript: 2,504; xml: 892; fortran: 664; cs: 573
file content (134 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 3,074 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (9)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt -passes='default<O1>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='default<O2>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='default<O3>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s

; We are worse at propagating correlation facts when in select form
; as compared to the PHI form, so if we lower switches to early,
; we may make further optimizations problematic.

; propagate value to bb2.
define i64 @test1(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[X:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP]], i64 0, i64 10
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[SWITCH_SELECT]]
;
entry:
  switch i64 %x, label %bb3 [
  i64 0, label %bb1
  i64 1, label %bb2
  ]
bb1:
  ret i64 0
bb2:
  %0 = icmp eq i64 %x, 100
  br i1 %0, label %bb4, label %bb5
bb3:
  unreachable
bb4:
  ret i64 200
bb5:
  ret i64 10
}

; propagate value both to bb1 and bb2.
define i64 @test2(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[X:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP]], i64 0, i64 10
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[SWITCH_SELECT]]
;
entry:
  switch i64 %x, label %bb3 [
  i64 1, label %bb1
  i64 2, label %bb2
  ]
bb1:
  %0 = icmp eq i64 %x, 100
  br i1 %0, label %bb4, label %return
return:
  ret i64 0
bb2:
  %1 = icmp eq i64 %x, 101
  br i1 %1, label %bb4, label %bb5
bb3:
  unreachable
bb4:
  ret i64 200
bb5:
  ret i64 10
}

define i64 @test3(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COND:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[X:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SPEC_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND]], i64 10, i64 0
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[SPEC_SELECT]]
;
entry:
  switch i64 %x, label %bb1 [
  i64 1, label %bb2
  ]
bb1:
  ret i64 0
bb2:
  %0 = icmp eq i64 %x, 100
  br i1 %0, label %bb4, label %bb5
bb4:
  ret i64 200
bb5:
  ret i64 10
}

; bb2 has two predecessors with case value 1 and 2.
define i64 @test_fail1(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_fail1(
; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[X:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SPEC_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[SWITCH]], i64 0, i64 10
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[SPEC_SELECT]]
;
entry:
  switch i64 %x, label %bb3 [
  i64 0, label %bb1
  i64 1, label %bb2
  i64 2, label %bb2
  ]
bb1:
  ret i64 0
bb2:
  %0 = icmp eq i64 %x, 100
  br i1 %0, label %bb4, label %bb5
bb3:
  unreachable
bb4:
  ret i64 200
bb5:
  ret i64 10
}

; return block has two predecessors.
define i64 @test_fail2(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_fail2(
; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[X:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SWITCH_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[SWITCH_SELECTCMP]], i64 2, i64 1
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[SWITCH_SELECT]]
;
entry:
  switch i64 %x, label %bb2 [
  i64 0, label %bb1
  i64 1, label %return
  ]
bb1:
  br label %return
return:
  %retval.0 = phi i64 [ %x, %entry ], [ 2, %bb1 ]
  ret i64 %retval.0
bb2:
  unreachable
}