File: optimization-remark-new-pm.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-20 1%3A20.1.8-1~exp1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: experimental
  • size: 2,111,388 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 7,438,767; ansic: 1,393,871; asm: 1,012,926; python: 241,728; f90: 86,635; objc: 75,411; lisp: 42,144; pascal: 17,286; sh: 10,027; ml: 5,082; perl: 4,730; awk: 3,523; makefile: 3,349; javascript: 2,251; xml: 892; fortran: 672
file content (20 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 964 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (18) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
 
// Verify that remarks for the inliner appear. The remarks under the new PM will
// be slightly different than those emitted by the legacy PM. The new PM inliner
// also does not appear to be added at O0, so we test at O1.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -emit-llvm-only -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -emit-llvm-only -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -verify

int foo(int x, int y) __attribute__((always_inline));
int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }

float foz(int x, int y) __attribute__((noinline));
float foz(int x, int y) { return x * y; }

// The negative diagnostics are emitted twice because the inliner runs
// twice.
//
int bar(int j) {
  // expected-remark@+2 {{'foz' not inlined into 'bar' because it should never be inlined (cost=never)}}
  // expected-remark@+1 {{'foo' inlined into 'bar'}}
  return foo(j, j - 2) * foz(j - 2, j);
}