1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --no_x86_scrub_sp --version 5
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i386-unknown-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
; Test for issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/115323
declare double @g(double, double)
; Though not visible within the IR, this will lower to an FSINCOS node, with
; store users, that are within a (callseq_start, callseq_end) pair. In this
; case, the stores cannot be folded into the sincos call.
define double @negative_sincos_with_stores_within_call_sequence(double %a) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: negative_sincos_with_stores_within_call_sequence:
; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: subl $44, %esp
; CHECK-NEXT: fldl 48(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: leal 24(%esp), %eax
; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, 12(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: leal 32(%esp), %eax
; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, 8(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: fstpl (%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: calll sincos
; CHECK-NEXT: fldl 32(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: fldl 24(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: faddl {{\.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
; CHECK-NEXT: fxch %st(1)
; CHECK-NEXT: fstpl 8(%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: fstpl (%esp)
; CHECK-NEXT: calll g@PLT
; CHECK-NEXT: addl $44, %esp
; CHECK-NEXT: retl
entry:
%0 = tail call double @llvm.sin.f64(double %a)
%1 = tail call double @llvm.cos.f64(double %a)
%add = fadd double %1, 3.140000e+00
%call = tail call double @g(double %add, double %0)
ret double %call
}
|
