File: google-explicit-constructor.rst

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-6.0 1%3A6.0.1-10
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 598,080 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,046,253; ansic: 595,057; asm: 271,965; python: 128,926; objc: 106,554; sh: 21,906; lisp: 10,191; pascal: 6,094; ml: 5,544; perl: 5,265; makefile: 2,227; cs: 2,027; xml: 686; php: 212; csh: 117
file content (56 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,165 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (29)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
.. title:: clang-tidy - google-explicit-constructor

google-explicit-constructor
===========================


Checks that constructors callable with a single argument and conversion
operators are marked explicit to avoid the risk of unintentional implicit
conversions.

Consider this example:

.. code-block:: c++

  struct S {
    int x;
    operator bool() const { return true; }
  };

  bool f() {
    S a{1};
    S b{2};
    return a == b;
  }

The function will return ``true``, since the objects are implicitly converted to
``bool`` before comparison, which is unlikely to be the intent.

The check will suggest inserting ``explicit`` before the constructor or
conversion operator declaration. However, copy and move constructors should not
be explicit, as well as constructors taking a single ``initializer_list``
argument.

This code:

.. code-block:: c++

  struct S {
    S(int a);
    explicit S(const S&);
    operator bool() const;
    ...

will become

.. code-block:: c++

  struct S {
    explicit S(int a);
    S(const S&);
    explicit operator bool() const;
    ...



See https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Explicit_Constructors