File: performance-inefficient-string-concatenation.rst

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-6.0 1%3A6.0.1-10
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 598,080 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,046,253; ansic: 595,057; asm: 271,965; python: 128,926; objc: 106,554; sh: 21,906; lisp: 10,191; pascal: 6,094; ml: 5,544; perl: 5,265; makefile: 2,227; cs: 2,027; xml: 686; php: 212; csh: 117
file content (59 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,359 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (9)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
.. title:: clang-tidy - performance-inefficient-string-concatenation

performance-inefficient-string-concatenation
============================================

This check warns about the performance overhead arising from concatenating
strings using the ``operator+``, for instance:

.. code-block:: c++

    std::string a("Foo"), b("Bar");
    a = a + b;

Instead of this structure you should use ``operator+=`` or ``std::string``'s
(``std::basic_string``) class member function ``append()``. For instance:

.. code-block:: c++

   std::string a("Foo"), b("Baz");
   for (int i = 0; i < 20000; ++i) {
       a = a + "Bar" + b;
   }

Could be rewritten in a greatly more efficient way like:

.. code-block:: c++

   std::string a("Foo"), b("Baz");
   for (int i = 0; i < 20000; ++i) {
       a.append("Bar").append(b);
   }

And this can be rewritten too:

.. code-block:: c++

   void f(const std::string&) {}
   std::string a("Foo"), b("Baz");
   void g() {
       f(a + "Bar" + b);
   }

In a slightly more efficient way like:

.. code-block:: c++

   void f(const std::string&) {}
   std::string a("Foo"), b("Baz");
   void g() {
       f(std::string(a).append("Bar").append(b));
   }

Options
-------

.. option:: StrictMode

   When zero, the check will only check the string usage in ``while``, ``for``
   and ``for-range`` statements. Default is `0`.