File: pch-from-libclang.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-6.0 1%3A6.0.1-10
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 598,080 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,046,253; ansic: 595,057; asm: 271,965; python: 128,926; objc: 106,554; sh: 21,906; lisp: 10,191; pascal: 6,094; ml: 5,544; perl: 5,265; makefile: 2,227; cs: 2,027; xml: 686; php: 212; csh: 117
file content (27 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,335 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (5)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
// Check that clang can use a PCH created from libclang.

// FIXME: Non-darwin bots fail. Would need investigation using -module-file-info to see what is the difference in modules generated from libclang vs the compiler invocation, in those systems.
// REQUIRES: system-darwin

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify
// RUN: c-index-test -write-pch %t.h.pch %s -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t.mcp -Xclang -triple -Xclang x86_64-apple-darwin
// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -include %t.h %s -Xclang -verify -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t.mcp -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record -Xclang -triple -Xclang x86_64-apple-darwin -Xclang -fallow-pch-with-compiler-errors
// RUN: %clang -x c-header %s -o %t.clang.h.pch -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t.mcp -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record -Xclang -triple -Xclang x86_64-apple-darwin -Xclang -fallow-pch-with-compiler-errors -Xclang -verify
// RUN: c-index-test -test-load-source local %s -include %t.clang.h -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t.mcp -Xclang -triple -Xclang x86_64-apple-darwin | FileCheck %s

#ifndef HEADER
#define HEADER

void some_function(undeclared_type p); // expected-error{{unknown type name}}

struct S { int x; };

#else
// expected-no-diagnostics

void test(struct S *s) {
  // CHECK: [[@LINE+1]]:6: MemberRefExpr=x:[[@LINE-6]]:16
  s->x = 0;
}

#endif