File: deadcode.ll

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-9 1%3A9.0.1-16.1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 882,388 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 4,167,636; ansic: 714,256; asm: 457,610; python: 155,927; objc: 65,094; sh: 42,856; lisp: 26,908; perl: 7,786; pascal: 7,722; makefile: 6,881; ml: 5,581; awk: 3,648; cs: 2,027; xml: 888; javascript: 381; ruby: 156
file content (37 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 921 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (16)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
; RUN: opt < %s -reassociate -disable-output

; It has been detected that dead loops like the one in this test case can be
; created by -jump-threading (it was detected by a csmith generated program).
;
; According to -verify this is valid input (even if it could be discussed if
; the dead loop really satisfies SSA form).
;
; The problem found was that the -reassociate pass ends up in an infinite loop
; when analysing the 'deadloop1' basic block. See "Bugzilla - Bug 30818".
define void @deadloop1() {
  br label %endlabel

deadloop1:
  %1 = xor i32 %2, 7
  %2 = xor i32 %1, 8
  br label %deadloop1

endlabel:
  ret void
}


; Another example showing that dead code could result in infinite loops in
; reassociate pass. See "Bugzilla - Bug 30818".
define void @deadloop2() {
  br label %endlabel

deadloop2:
  %1 = and i32 %2, 7
  %2 = and i32 %3, 8
  %3 = and i32 %1, 6
  br label %deadloop2

endlabel:
  ret void
}