File: optimization-remark-new-pm.c

package info (click to toggle)
llvm-toolchain-9 1%3A9.0.1-16
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 882,436 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 4,167,636; ansic: 714,256; asm: 457,610; python: 155,927; objc: 65,094; sh: 42,856; lisp: 26,908; perl: 7,786; pascal: 7,722; makefile: 6,881; ml: 5,581; awk: 3,648; cs: 2,027; xml: 888; javascript: 381; ruby: 156
file content (20 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,019 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
// Verify that remarks for the inliner appear. The remarks under the new PM will
// be slightly different than those emitted by the legacy PM. The new PM inliner
// also doesnot appear to be added at O0, so we test at O1.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -emit-llvm-only -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -emit-llvm-only -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -verify

int foo(int x, int y) __attribute__((always_inline));
int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }

float foz(int x, int y) __attribute__((noinline));
float foz(int x, int y) { return x * y; }

// The negative diagnostics are emitted twice because the inliner runs
// twice.
//
int bar(int j) {
  // expected-remark@+2 {{foz not inlined into bar because it should never be inlined (cost=never)}}
  // expected-remark@+1 {{foo inlined into bar}}
  return foo(j, j - 2) * foz(j - 2, j);
}