1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230
|
# -*-perl-*-
$description = "Test handling of double-colon rules.";
$details = "\
We test these features:
- Multiple commands for the same (double-colon) target
- Different prerequisites for targets: only out-of-date
ones are rebuilt.
- Double-colon targets that aren't the goal target.
Then we do the same thing for parallel builds: double-colon
targets should always be built serially.";
# TEST 0: A simple double-colon rule that isn't the goal target.
run_make_test(q!
all: baz
foo:: f1.h ; @echo foo FIRST
foo:: f2.h ; @echo foo SECOND
bar:: ; @echo aaa; sleep 1; echo aaa done
bar:: ; @echo bbb
baz:: ; @echo aaa
baz:: ; @echo bbb
biz:: ; @echo aaa
biz:: two ; @echo bbb
two: ; @echo two
f1.h f2.h: ; @echo $@
d :: ; @echo ok
d :: d ; @echo oops
!,
"all", "aaa\nbbb\n");
# TEST 1: As above, in parallel
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 all", "aaa\nbbb\n");
}
# TEST 2: A simple double-colon rule that is the goal target
run_make_test(undef, "bar", "aaa\naaa done\nbbb\n");
# TEST 3: As above, in parallel
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 bar", "aaa\naaa done\nbbb\n");
}
# TEST 4: Each double-colon rule is supposed to be run individually
&utouch(-5, 'f2.h');
&touch('foo');
run_make_test(undef, "foo", "f1.h\nfoo FIRST\n");
# TEST 5: Again, in parallel.
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 foo", "f1.h\nfoo FIRST\n");
}
# TEST 6: Each double-colon rule is supposed to be run individually
&utouch(-5, 'f1.h');
unlink('f2.h');
&touch('foo');
run_make_test(undef, "foo", "f2.h\nfoo SECOND\n");
# TEST 7: Again, in parallel.
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 foo", "f2.h\nfoo SECOND\n");
}
# TEST 8: Test circular dependency check; PR/1671
run_make_test(undef, "d", "ok\n$make_name: Circular d <- d dependency dropped.\noops\n");
# TEST 8: I don't grok why this is different than the above, but it is...
#
# Hmm... further testing indicates this might be timing-dependent?
#
#if ($parallel_jobs) {
# run_make_test(undef, "-j10 biz", "aaa\ntwo\nbbb\n");
#}
unlink('foo','f1.h','f2.h');
# TEST 9: make sure all rules in s double colon family get executed
# (Savannah bug #14334).
#
&touch('one');
&touch('two');
run_make_test('
.RECIPEPREFIX = >
.PHONY: all
all: result
result:: one
> @echo $^ >>$@
> @echo $^
result:: two
> @echo $^ >>$@
> @echo $^
',
'',
'one
two');
unlink('result','one','two');
# TEST 10: SV 33399 : check for proper backslash handling
run_make_test('
a\ xb :: ; @echo one
a\ xb :: ; @echo two
',
'', "one\ntwo\n");
# Test 11: SV 44742 : All double-colon rules should be run in parallel build.
run_make_test('
.RECIPEPREFIX = >
result :: 01
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 02
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 03
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 04
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 05
> @echo update
> @touch $@
01 02 03 04 05:
> @touch 01 02 03 04 05
',
'-j10 result', "update\nupdate\nupdate\nupdate\nupdate\n");
unlink('result', '01', '02', '03', '04', '05');
# Test 12: SV 44742 : Double-colon rules with parallelism
run_make_test('
root: all ; echo root
all:: ; echo all_one
all:: 3 ; echo all_two
%: ; sleep $*
',
'-rs -j2 1 2 root', "all_one\nall_two\nroot\n");
# SV 47995 : Parallel double-colon rules with FORCE
run_make_test('
all:: ; @echo one
all:: joe ; @echo four
joe: FORCE ; touch joe-is-forced
FORCE:
',
'-j5', "one\ntouch joe-is-forced\nfour\n");
unlink('joe-is-forced');
# sv 60188.
# Even though test.x is explicitly mentioned, terminal pattern rules still
# apply only if the prerequisite exists.
touch('hello.z');
# subtest 1. test.x is explicitly mentioned.
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: test.x ; touch $@
%.x: ;
!,
'', "#MAKE#: Nothing to be done for 'all'.\n");
unlink('hello.z');
# subtest 2. hello.x is derived from the stem.
touch('hello.z');
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: %.x; touch $@
%.x: ; touch $@
!,
'', "#MAKE#: Nothing to be done for 'all'.\n");
unlink('hello.z');
# subtest 3
# hello.x is explicitly mentioned on an unrelated rule and thus is not an
# intermediate file.
# Terminal pattern rules do not apply anyway and there is no rule to built
# 'hello.x'.
touch('hello.z');
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: %.x; touch $@
%.x: ;
unrelated: hello.x
!,
'', "#MAKE#: *** No rule to make target 'hello.x', needed by 'hello.z'. Stop.\n", 512);
unlink('hello.z');
# This tells the test driver that the perl test script executed properly.
1;
|