1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260
|
# parallelepiped model
# Note: model title and parameter table are inserted automatically
r"""
Definition
----------
This model calculates the scattering from a rectangular solid
(:numref:`parallelepiped-image`).
If you need to apply polydispersity, see also :ref:`rectangular-prism`. For
information about polarised and magnetic scattering, see
the :ref:`magnetism` documentation.
.. _parallelepiped-image:
.. figure:: img/parallelepiped_geometry.jpg
Parallelepiped with the corresponding definition of sides.
The three dimensions of the parallelepiped (strictly here a cuboid) may be
given in *any* size order as long as the particles are randomly oriented (i.e.
take on all possible orientations see notes on 2D below). To avoid multiple fit
solutions, especially with Monte-Carlo fit methods, it may be advisable to
restrict their ranges. There may be a number of closely similar "best fits", so
some trial and error, or fixing of some dimensions at expected values, may
help.
The form factor is normalized by the particle volume and the 1D scattering
intensity $I(q)$ is then calculated as:
.. Comment by Miguel Gonzalez:
I am modifying the original text because I find the notation a little bit
confusing. I think that in most textbooks/papers, the notation P(Q) is
used for the form factor (adim, P(Q=0)=1), although F(q) seems also to
be used. But here (as for many other models), P(q) is used to represent
the scattering intensity (in cm-1 normally). It would be good to agree on
a common notation.
.. math::
I(q) = \frac{\text{scale}}{V} (\Delta\rho \cdot V)^2
\left< P(q, \alpha, \beta) \right> + \text{background}
where the volume $V = A B C$, the contrast is defined as
$\Delta\rho = \rho_\text{p} - \rho_\text{solvent}$, $P(q, \alpha, \beta)$
is the form factor corresponding to a parallelepiped oriented
at an angle $\alpha$ (angle between the long axis C and $\vec q$), and $\beta$
(the angle between the projection of the particle in the $xy$ detector plane
and the $y$ axis) and the averaging $\left<\ldots\right>$ is applied over all
orientations.
Assuming $a = A/B < 1$, $b = B /B = 1$, and $c = C/B > 1$, the
form factor is given by (Mittelbach and Porod, 1961 [#Mittelbach1961]_)
.. math::
P(q, \alpha) = \int_0^1 \phi_Q\left(\mu \sqrt{1-\sigma^2},a\right)
\left[S(\mu c \sigma/2)\right]^2 d\sigma
with
.. math::
\phi_Q(\mu,a) &= \int_0^1
\left\{S\left[\frac{\mu}{2}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2}u\right)\right]
S\left[\frac{\mu a}{2}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}u\right)\right]
\right\}^2 du \\
S(x) &= \frac{\sin x}{x} \\
\mu &= qB
where substitution of $\sigma = cos\alpha$ and $\beta = \pi/2 \ u$ have been
applied.
For **oriented** particles, the 2D scattering intensity, $I(q_x, q_y)$, is
given as:
.. math::
I(q_x, q_y) = \frac{\text{scale}}{V} (\Delta\rho \cdot V)^2 P(q_x, q_y)
+ \text{background}
.. Comment by Miguel Gonzalez:
This reflects the logic of the code, as in parallelepiped.c the call
to _pkernel returns $P(q_x, q_y)$ and then this is multiplied by
$V^2 * (\Delta \rho)^2$. And finally outside parallelepiped.c it will be
multiplied by scale, normalized by $V$ and the background added. But
mathematically it makes more sense to write
$I(q_x, q_y) = \text{scale} V \Delta\rho^2 P(q_x, q_y) + \text{background}$,
with scale being the volume fraction.
Where $P(q_x, q_y)$ for a given orientation of the form factor is calculated as
.. math::
P(q_x, q_y) = \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}qA\cos\alpha)}{(\tfrac{1}
{2}qA\cos\alpha)}\right]^2
\left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}qB\cos\beta)}{(\tfrac{1}
{2}qB\cos\beta)}\right]^2
\left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}qC\cos\gamma)}{(\tfrac{1}
{2}qC\cos\gamma)}\right]^2
with
.. math::
\cos\alpha &= \hat A \cdot \hat q, \\
\cos\beta &= \hat B \cdot \hat q, \\
\cos\gamma &= \hat C \cdot \hat q
FITTING NOTES
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#. The 2nd virial coefficient of the parallelepiped is calculated based on
the averaged effective radius, after appropriately sorting the three
dimensions, to give an oblate or prolate particle, $(=\sqrt{AB/\pi})$ and
length $(= C)$ values, and used as the effective radius for
$S(q)$ when $P(q) \cdot S(q)$ is applied.
#. For 2d data the orientation of the particle is required, described using
angles $\theta$, $\phi$ and $\Psi$ as in the diagrams below, where $\theta$
and $\phi$ define the orientation of the director in the laboratory reference
frame of the beam direction ($z$) and detector plane ($x-y$ plane), while
the angle $\Psi$ is effectively the rotational angle around the particle
$C$ axis. For $\theta = 0$ and $\phi = 0$, $\Psi = 0$ corresponds to the
$B$ axis oriented parallel to the y-axis of the detector with $A$ along
the x-axis. For other $\theta$, $\phi$ values, the order of rotations
matters. In particular, the parallelepiped must first be rotated $\theta$
degrees in the $x-z$ plane before rotating $\phi$ degrees around the $z$
axis (in the $x-y$ plane). Applying orientational distribution to the
particle orientation (i.e `jitter` to one or more of these angles) can get
more confusing as `jitter` is defined **NOT** with respect to the laboratory
frame but the particle reference frame. It is thus highly recommended to
read :ref:`orientation` for further details of the calculation and angular
dispersions.
.. note:: For 2d, constraints must be applied during fitting to ensure that the
order of sides chosen is not altered, and hence that the correct definition
of angles is preserved. For the default choice shown here, that means
ensuring that the inequality $A < B < C$ is not violated, The calculation
will not report an error, but the results may be not correct.
.. _parallelepiped-orientation:
.. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition.png
Definition of the angles for oriented parallelepiped, shown with $A<B<C$.
.. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection.png
Examples of the angles for an oriented parallelepiped against the
detector plane.
.. Comment by Paul Butler
I am commenting this section out as we are trying to minimize the amount of
oritentational detail here and encourage the user to go to the full
orientation documentation so that changes can be made in just one place.
below is the commented paragraph:
On introducing "Orientational Distribution" in the angles, "distribution of
theta" and "distribution of phi" parameters will appear. These are actually
rotations about axes $\delta_1$ and $\delta_2$ of the parallelepiped,
perpendicular to the $a$ x $c$ and $b$ x $c$ faces. (When $\theta = \phi = 0$
these are parallel to the $Y$ and $X$ axes of the instrument.) The third
orientation distribution, in $\psi$, is about the $c$ axis of the particle,
perpendicular to the $a$ x $b$ face. Some experimentation may be required to
understand the 2d patterns fully as discussed in :ref:`orientation` .
Validation
----------
Validation of the code was done by comparing the output of the 1D calculation
to the angular average of the output of a 2D calculation over all possible
angles.
References
----------
See also Nayuk [#Nayuk2012]_ and Onsager [#Onsager1949]_.
.. [#Mittelbach1961] P Mittelbach and G Porod, *Acta Physica Austriaca*,
14 (1961) 185-211
.. [#Nayuk2012] R Nayuk and K Huber, *Z. Phys. Chem.*, 226 (2012) 837-854
.. [#Onsager1949] L. Onsager, *Ann. New York Acad. Sci.*, 51 (1949) 627-659
Authorship and Verification
----------------------------
* **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010
* **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle **Date:** April 05, 2017
* **Last Reviewed by:** Miguel Gonzales and Paul Butler **Date:** May 24,
2018 - documentation updated
"""
import numpy as np
from numpy import inf
name = "parallelepiped"
title = "Rectangular parallelepiped with uniform scattering length density."
description = """
I(q)= scale*V*(sld - sld_solvent)^2*P(q,alpha)+background
P(q,alpha) = integral from 0 to 1 of ...
phi(mu*sqrt(1-sigma^2),a) * S(mu*c*sigma/2)^2 * dsigma
with
phi(mu,a) = integral from 0 to 1 of ..
(S((mu/2)*cos(pi*u/2))*S((mu*a/2)*sin(pi*u/2)))^2 * du
S(x) = sin(x)/x
mu = q*B
V: Volume of the rectangular parallelepiped
alpha: angle between the long axis of the
parallelepiped and the q-vector for 1D
"""
category = "shape:parallelepiped"
# ["name", "units", default, [lower, upper], "type","description"],
parameters = [["sld", "1e-6/Ang^2", 4, [-inf, inf], "sld",
"Parallelepiped scattering length density"],
["sld_solvent", "1e-6/Ang^2", 1, [-inf, inf], "sld",
"Solvent scattering length density"],
["length_a", "Ang", 35, [0, inf], "volume",
"Shorter side of the parallelepiped"],
["length_b", "Ang", 75, [0, inf], "volume",
"Second side of the parallelepiped"],
["length_c", "Ang", 400, [0, inf], "volume",
"Larger side of the parallelepiped"],
["theta", "degrees", 60, [-360, 360], "orientation",
"c axis to beam angle"],
["phi", "degrees", 60, [-360, 360], "orientation",
"rotation about beam"],
["psi", "degrees", 60, [-360, 360], "orientation",
"rotation about c axis"],
]
source = ["lib/gauss76.c", "parallelepiped.c"]
have_Fq = True
radius_effective_modes = [
"equivalent cylinder excluded volume", "equivalent volume sphere",
"half length_a", "half length_b", "half length_c",
"equivalent circular cross-section", "half ab diagonal", "half diagonal",
]
def random():
"""Return a random parameter set for the model."""
length = 10**np.random.uniform(1, 4.7, size=3)
pars = dict(
length_a=length[0],
length_b=length[1],
length_c=length[2],
)
return pars
# rkh 7/4/17 add random unit test for 2d, note make all params different,
# 2d values not tested against other codes or models
qx, qy = 0.2 * np.cos(np.pi/6.), 0.2 * np.sin(np.pi/6.)
tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.17758004974],
[{}, [0.2], [0.17758004974]],
[{'theta':10.0, 'phi':20.0}, (qx, qy), 0.0089517140475],
[{'theta':10.0, 'phi':20.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.0089517140475]],
]
del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner
|