1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
|
r"""
Definition
----------
This model provides the form factor, $P(q)$, for stacked discs (tactoids)
with a core/layer structure which is constructed itself as $P(q) S(Q)$
multiplying a $P(q)$ for individual core/layer disks by a structure factor
$S(q)$ proposed by Kratky and Porod in 1949\ [#Kratky1949]_ assuming the next
neighbor distance (d-spacing) in the stack of parallel discs obeys a Gaussian
distribution. As such the normalization of this "composite" form factor is
relative to the individual disk volume, not the volume of the stack of disks.
This model is appropriate for example for non non exfoliated clay particles
such as Laponite.
.. figure:: img/stacked_disks_geometry.png
Geometry of a single core/layer disk
The scattered intensity $I(q)$ is calculated as
.. math::
I(q) = N\int_{0}^{\pi /2}\left[ \Delta \rho_t
\left( V_t f_t(q,\alpha) - V_c f_c(q,\alpha)\right) + \Delta
\rho_c V_c f_c(q,\alpha)\right]^2 S(q,\alpha)\sin{\alpha}\ d\alpha
+ \text{background}
where the contrast
.. math::
\Delta \rho_i = \rho_i - \rho_\text{solvent}
and $N$ is the number of individual (single) discs per unit volume, $\alpha$
is the angle between the axis of the disc and $q$, and $V_t$ and $V_c$ are the
total volume and the core volume of a single disc, respectively, and
.. math::
f_t(q,\alpha) =
\left(\frac{\sin(q(d+h)\cos{\alpha})}{q(d+h)\cos{\alpha}}\right)
\left(\frac{2J_1(qR\sin{\alpha})}{qR\sin{\alpha}} \right)
f_c(q,\alpha) =
\left(\frac{\sin(qh)\cos{\alpha})}{qh\cos{\alpha}}\right)
\left(\frac{2J_1(qR\sin{\alpha})}{qR\sin{\alpha}}\right)
where $d$ = thickness of the layer (*thick_layer*),
$2h$ = core thickness (*thick_core*), and $R$ = radius of the disc (*radius*).
.. math::
S(q,\alpha) = 1 + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^n(n-k)\cos{(kDq\cos{\alpha})}
\exp\left[ -k(q)^2(D\cos{\alpha}~\sigma_d)^2/2\right]
where $n$ is the total number of the disc stacked (*n_stacking*),
$D = 2(d+h)$ is the next neighbor center-to-center distance (d-spacing),
and $\sigma_d$ = the Gaussian standard deviation of the d-spacing (*sigma_d*).
Note that $D\cos(\alpha)$ is the component of $D$ parallel to $q$ and the last
term in the equation above is effectively a Debye-Waller factor term.
.. note::
1. Each assembly in the stack is layer/core/layer, so the spacing of the
cores is core plus two layers. The 2nd virial coefficient of the cylinder
is calculated based on the *radius* and *length*
= *n_stacking* * (*thick_core* + 2 * *thick_layer*)
values, and used as the effective radius for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) * S(Q)$
is applied.
2. the resolution smearing calculation uses 76 Gaussian quadrature points
to properly smear the model since the function is HIGHLY oscillatory,
especially around the q-values that correspond to the repeat distance of
the layers.
2d scattering from oriented stacks is calculated in the same way as for
cylinders, for further details of the calculation and angular dispersions
see :ref:`orientation`.
.. figure:: img/cylinder_angle_definition.png
Angles $\theta$ and $\phi$ orient the stack of discs relative
to the beam line coordinates, where the beam is along the $z$ axis.
Rotation $\theta$, initially in the $xz$ plane, is carried out first,
then rotation $\phi$ about the $z$ axis. Orientation distributions are
described as rotations about two perpendicular axes $\delta_1$ and
$\delta_2$ in the frame of the cylinder itself, which when
$\theta = \phi = 0$ are parallel to the $Y$ and $X$ axes.
Our model is derived from the form factor calculations implemented in a
C-library provided by the NIST Center for Neutron Research\ [#Kline2006]_
References
----------
See also Higgins and Benoit [#Higgins1994]_ and Guinier and
Fournet [#Guinier1955]_.
.. [#Kratky1949] O Kratky and G Porod, *J. Colloid Science*, 4, (1949) 35
.. [#Kline2006] S R Kline, *J Appl. Cryst.*, 39 (2006) 895
.. [#Higgins1994] J S Higgins and H C Benoit, *Polymers and Neutron Scattering*,
Clarendon, Oxford, 1994
.. [#Guinier1955] A Guinier and G Fournet, *Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays*,
John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1955
Authorship and Verification
----------------------------
* **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010
* **Last Modified by:** Paul Butler and Paul Kienzle **Date:** November 26, 2016
* **Last Reviewed by:** Paul Butler and Paul Kienzle **Date:** November 26, 2016
"""
import numpy as np
from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi
name = "stacked_disks"
title = "Form factor for a stacked set of non exfoliated core/shell disks"
description = """\
One layer of disk consists of a core, a top layer, and a bottom layer.
radius = the radius of the disk
thick_core = thickness of the core
thick_layer = thickness of a layer
sld_core = the SLD of the core
sld_layer = the SLD of the layers
n_stacking = the number of the disks
sigma_d = Gaussian STD of d-spacing
sld_solvent = the SLD of the solvent
"""
category = "shape:cylinder"
# pylint: disable=bad-whitespace, line-too-long
# ["name", "units", default, [lower, upper], "type","description"],
parameters = [
["thick_core", "Ang", 10.0, [0, inf], "volume", "Thickness of the core disk"],
["thick_layer", "Ang", 10.0, [0, inf], "volume", "Thickness of layer each side of core"],
["radius", "Ang", 15.0, [0, inf], "volume", "Radius of the stacked disk"],
["n_stacking", "", 1.0, [1, inf], "volume", "Number of stacked layer/core/layer disks"],
["sigma_d", "Ang", 0, [0, inf], "", "Sigma of nearest neighbor spacing"],
["sld_core", "1e-6/Ang^2", 4, [-inf, inf], "sld", "Core scattering length density"],
["sld_layer", "1e-6/Ang^2", 0.0, [-inf, inf], "sld", "Layer scattering length density"],
["sld_solvent", "1e-6/Ang^2", 5.0, [-inf, inf], "sld", "Solvent scattering length density"],
["theta", "degrees", 0, [-360, 360], "orientation", "Orientation of the stacked disk axis w/respect incoming beam"],
["phi", "degrees", 0, [-360, 360], "orientation", "Rotation about beam"],
]
# pylint: enable=bad-whitespace, line-too-long
source = ["lib/polevl.c", "lib/sas_J1.c", "lib/gauss76.c", "stacked_disks.c"]
def random():
"""Return a random parameter set for the model."""
radius = 10**np.random.uniform(1, 4.7)
total_stack = 10**np.random.uniform(1, 4.7)
n_stacking = int(10**np.random.uniform(0, np.log10(total_stack)-1) + 0.5)
d = total_stack/n_stacking
thick_core = np.random.uniform(0, d-2) # at least 1 A for each layer
thick_layer = (d - thick_core)/2
# Let polydispersity peak around 15%; 95% < 0.4; max=100%
sigma_d = d * np.random.beta(1.5, 7)
pars = dict(
thick_core=thick_core,
thick_layer=thick_layer,
radius=radius,
n_stacking=n_stacking,
sigma_d=sigma_d,
)
return pars
# After redefinition of spherical coordinates -
# tests had in old coords theta=0, phi=0; new coords theta=90, phi=0
q = 0.1
# april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, assume correct!
qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)
qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)
# Accuracy tests based on content in test/utest_extra_models.py.
# Added 2 tests with n_stacked = 5 using SasView 3.1.2 - PDB;
# for which alas q=0.001 values seem closer to n_stacked=1 not 5,
# changed assuming my 4.1 code OK, RKH
tests = [
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 1.0,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
}, 0.001, 5075.12],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 5,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
# n_stacking=1 not 5 ? slight change in value here 11jan2017,
# check other cpu types
#}, 0.001, 5065.12793824],
#}, 0.001, 5075.11570493],
}, 0.001, 25325.635693],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 100.0,
'n_stacking': 5,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 20.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
}, (qx, qy), 0.0491167089952],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 5,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
# n_stacking=1 not 5 ? slight change in value here 11jan2017,
# check other cpu types
#}, 0.164, 0.0127673597265],
#}, 0.164, 0.01480812968],
}, 0.164, 0.0598367986509],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 1.0,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
# second test here was at q=90, changed it to q=5,
# note I(q) is then just value of flat background
}, [0.001, 5.0], [5075.12, 0.001]],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 1.0,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
}, ([0.4, 0.5]), [0.00105074, 0.00121761]],
#[{'thick_core': 10.0,
# 'thick_layer': 15.0,
# 'radius': 3000.0,
# 'n_stacking': 1.0,
# 'sigma_d': 0.0,
# 'sld_core': 4.0,
# 'sld_layer': -0.4,
# 'sld_solvent': 5.0,
# 'theta': 90.0,
# 'phi': 20.0,
# 'scale': 0.01,
# 'background': 0.001,
# 2017-05-18 PAK temporarily suppress output of qx,qy test; j1 is
# not accurate for large qr
# }, (qx, qy), 0.0341738733124],
# }, (qx, qy), None],
[{'thick_core': 10.0,
'thick_layer': 15.0,
'radius': 3000.0,
'n_stacking': 1.0,
'sigma_d': 0.0,
'sld_core': 4.0,
'sld_layer': -0.4,
'sld_solvent': 5.0,
'theta': 90.0,
'phi': 0.0,
'scale': 0.01,
'background': 0.001,
}, ([1.3, 1.57]), [0.0010039, 0.0010038]],
]
# 11Jan2017 RKH checking unit test again, note they are all 1D, no 2D
|