1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% Copyright (C) 1996-1999 The University of Melbourne.
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% File: modecheck_call.m.
% Main author: fjh.
%
% This file contains the code to modecheck a call.
%
% Check that there is a mode declaration for the predicate which matches
% the current instantiation of the arguments. (Also handle calls to
% implied modes.) If the called predicate is one for which we must infer
% the modes, then a new mode for the called predicate whose initial insts
% are the result of normalising the current inst of the arguments.
%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- module modecheck_call.
:- interface.
:- import_module hlds_goal, hlds_pred, hlds_module.
:- import_module prog_data, modes, mode_info.
:- import_module list, std_util.
:- pred modecheck_call_pred(pred_id, proc_id, list(prog_var),
maybe(determinism), proc_id, list(prog_var),
extra_goals, mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_call_pred(in, in, in, in, out, out, out,
mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
:- pred modecheck_higher_order_call(pred_or_func, prog_var, list(prog_var),
list(mode), determinism, list(prog_var),
extra_goals, mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_higher_order_call(in, in, in, out, out, out, out,
mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
:- pred modecheck_aditi_builtin(aditi_builtin, simple_call_id,
list(prog_var), list(mode), determinism,
list(prog_var), extra_goals, mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_aditi_builtin(in, in, in, in, out, out, out,
mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
%
% Given two modes of a predicate, figure out whether
% they are indistinguishable; that is, whether any valid call to
% one mode would also be a valid call to the other.
% (If so, it is a mode error.)
% Note that mode declarations which only have different final insts
% do not count as distinguishable.
%
:- pred modes_are_indistinguishable(proc_id, proc_id, pred_info, module_info).
:- mode modes_are_indistinguishable(in, in, in, in) is semidet.
%
% Given two modes of a predicate, figure out whether
% they are identical, except that one is cc_nondet/cc_multi
% and the other is nondet/multi.
% This is used by determinism analysis to substitute
% a multi mode for a cc_multi one if the call occurs in a
% non-cc context.
%
:- pred modes_are_identical_bar_cc(proc_id, proc_id, pred_info, module_info).
:- mode modes_are_identical_bar_cc(in, in, in, in) is semidet.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- implementation.
:- import_module hlds_data, instmap, prog_data, (inst).
:- import_module mode_info, mode_debug, modes, mode_util, mode_errors.
:- import_module clause_to_proc, inst_match, make_hlds.
:- import_module det_report, unify_proc.
:- import_module int, map, bool, set, require.
modecheck_higher_order_call(PredOrFunc, PredVar, Args0, Modes, Det,
Args, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
%
% First, check that `PredVar' has a higher-order pred inst
% (of the appropriate arity)
%
mode_info_get_instmap(ModeInfo0, InstMap0),
instmap__lookup_var(InstMap0, PredVar, PredVarInst0),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo0),
inst_expand(ModuleInfo0, PredVarInst0, PredVarInst),
list__length(Args0, Arity),
(
PredVarInst = ground(_Uniq, yes(PredInstInfo)),
PredInstInfo = pred_inst_info(PredOrFunc, Modes0, Det0),
list__length(Modes0, Arity)
->
Det = Det0,
Modes = Modes0,
ArgOffset = 1,
modecheck_arg_list(ArgOffset, Modes, ExtraGoals, Args0, Args,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
( determinism_components(Det, _, at_most_zero) ->
instmap__init_unreachable(Instmap),
mode_info_set_instmap(Instmap, ModeInfo1, ModeInfo)
;
ModeInfo = ModeInfo1
)
;
% the error occurred in argument 1, i.e. the pred term
mode_info_set_call_arg_context(1, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
set__singleton_set(WaitingVars, PredVar),
mode_info_error(WaitingVars, mode_error_higher_order_pred_var(
PredOrFunc, PredVar, PredVarInst, Arity),
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo),
Modes = [],
Det = erroneous,
Args = Args0,
ExtraGoals = no_extra_goals
).
modecheck_aditi_builtin(AditiBuiltin, CallId,
Args0, Modes, Det, Args, ExtraGoals) -->
{ aditi_builtin_determinism(AditiBuiltin, Det) },
% `aditi_insert' goals have type_info arguments for each
% of the arguments of the tuple to insert added to the
% start of the argument list by polymorphism.m.
( { AditiBuiltin = aditi_insert(_) } ->
{ CallId = _ - _/Arity },
{ ArgOffset = -Arity }
;
{ ArgOffset = 0 }
),
% The argument modes are set by post_typecheck.m, so all
% that needs to be done here is to check that they match.
modecheck_arg_list(ArgOffset, Modes, ExtraGoals, Args0, Args).
:- pred aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_builtin, determinism).
:- mode aditi_builtin_determinism(in, out) is det.
aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_call(_, _, _, _), _) :-
error(
"modecheck_call__aditi_builtin_determinism: unexpected Aditi call").
aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_insert(_), det).
aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_delete(_, _), det).
aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_bulk_operation(_, _), det).
aditi_builtin_determinism(aditi_modify(_, _), det).
:- pred modecheck_arg_list(int, list(mode), extra_goals,
list(prog_var), list(prog_var), mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_arg_list(in, in, out, in, out,
mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
modecheck_arg_list(ArgOffset, Modes, ExtraGoals, Args0, Args,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
%
% Check that `Args0' have livenesses which match the
% expected livenesses.
%
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo0),
get_arg_lives(Modes, ModuleInfo0, ExpectedArgLives),
modecheck_var_list_is_live(Args0, ExpectedArgLives, ArgOffset,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
%
% Check that `Args0' have insts which match the expected
% initial insts, and set their new final insts (introducing
% extra unifications for implied modes, if necessary).
%
mode_list_get_initial_insts(Modes, ModuleInfo0, InitialInsts),
modecheck_var_has_inst_list(Args0, InitialInsts, ArgOffset,
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo2),
mode_list_get_final_insts(Modes, ModuleInfo0, FinalInsts),
modecheck_set_var_inst_list(Args0, InitialInsts, FinalInsts,
ArgOffset, Args, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo2, ModeInfo).
modecheck_call_pred(PredId, ProcId0, ArgVars0, DeterminismKnown,
TheProcId, ArgVars, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
mode_info_get_may_change_called_proc(ModeInfo0, MayChangeCalledProc),
mode_info_get_preds(ModeInfo0, Preds),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo),
map__lookup(Preds, PredId, PredInfo),
pred_info_procedures(PredInfo, Procs),
( MayChangeCalledProc = may_not_change_called_proc ->
( invalid_proc_id(ProcId0) ->
error("modecheck_call_pred: invalid proc_id")
;
ProcIds = [ProcId0]
)
;
% Get the list of different possible
% modes for the called predicate
map__keys(Procs, ProcIds)
),
compute_arg_offset(PredInfo, ArgOffset),
pred_info_get_markers(PredInfo, Markers),
% In order to give better diagnostics, we handle the
% cases where there are zero or one modes for the called
% predicate specially.
(
ProcIds = [],
\+ check_marker(Markers, infer_modes)
->
set__init(WaitingVars),
mode_info_error(WaitingVars, mode_error_no_mode_decl,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo),
invalid_proc_id(TheProcId),
ArgVars = ArgVars0,
ExtraGoals = no_extra_goals
;
ProcIds = [ProcId],
( \+ check_marker(Markers, infer_modes)
; MayChangeCalledProc = may_not_change_called_proc
)
->
TheProcId = ProcId,
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, ProcInfo),
%
% Check that `ArgsVars0' have livenesses which match the
% expected livenesses.
%
proc_info_arglives(ProcInfo, ModuleInfo, ProcArgLives0),
modecheck_var_list_is_live(ArgVars0, ProcArgLives0, ArgOffset,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
%
% Check that `ArgsVars0' have insts which match the expected
% initial insts, and set their new final insts (introducing
% extra unifications for implied modes, if necessary).
%
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo,
InitialInsts),
modecheck_var_has_inst_list(ArgVars0, InitialInsts, ArgOffset,
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo2),
modecheck_end_of_call(ProcInfo, ArgVars0, ArgOffset, ArgVars,
ExtraGoals, ModeInfo2, ModeInfo)
;
% set the current error list to empty (and
% save the old one in `OldErrors'). This is so the
% test for `Errors = []' in find_matching_modes
% will work.
mode_info_get_errors(ModeInfo0, OldErrors),
mode_info_set_errors([], ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
set__init(WaitingVars0),
modecheck_find_matching_modes(ProcIds, PredId, Procs, ArgVars0,
[], RevMatchingProcIds, WaitingVars0, WaitingVars,
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo2),
( RevMatchingProcIds = [],
no_matching_modes(PredId, ArgVars0,
DeterminismKnown, WaitingVars,
TheProcId, ModeInfo2, ModeInfo3),
ArgVars = ArgVars0,
ExtraGoals = no_extra_goals
;
RevMatchingProcIds = [_|_],
list__reverse(RevMatchingProcIds, MatchingProcIds),
choose_best_match(MatchingProcIds, PredId, Procs,
ArgVars0, TheProcId, ModeInfo2),
map__lookup(Procs, TheProcId, ProcInfo),
modecheck_end_of_call(ProcInfo, ArgVars0, ArgOffset,
ArgVars, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo2, ModeInfo3)
),
% restore the error list, appending any new error(s)
mode_info_get_errors(ModeInfo3, NewErrors),
list__append(OldErrors, NewErrors, Errors),
mode_info_set_errors(Errors, ModeInfo3, ModeInfo)
).
:- pred no_matching_modes(pred_id, list(prog_var), maybe(determinism),
set(prog_var), proc_id, mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode no_matching_modes(in, in, in, in, out, mode_info_di, mode_info_uo)
is det.
no_matching_modes(PredId, ArgVars, DeterminismKnown, WaitingVars, TheProcId,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
%
% There were no matching modes.
% If we're inferring modes for this called predicate, then
% just insert a new mode declaration which will match.
% Otherwise, report an error.
%
mode_info_get_preds(ModeInfo0, Preds),
map__lookup(Preds, PredId, PredInfo),
pred_info_get_markers(PredInfo, Markers),
( check_marker(Markers, infer_modes) ->
insert_new_mode(PredId, ArgVars, DeterminismKnown, TheProcId,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
% we don't yet know the final insts for the newly created mode
% of the called predicate, so we set the instmap to unreachable,
% indicating that we have no information about the modes at this
% point in the computation.
instmap__init_unreachable(Instmap),
mode_info_set_instmap(Instmap, ModeInfo1, ModeInfo)
;
invalid_proc_id(TheProcId), % dummy value
mode_info_get_instmap(ModeInfo0, InstMap),
instmap__lookup_vars(ArgVars, InstMap, ArgInsts),
mode_info_set_call_arg_context(0, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
mode_info_error(WaitingVars,
mode_error_no_matching_mode(ArgVars, ArgInsts),
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo)
).
:- pred modecheck_find_matching_modes(
list(proc_id), pred_id, proc_table, list(prog_var),
list(proc_id), list(proc_id), set(prog_var), set(prog_var),
mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_find_matching_modes(in, in, in, in,
in, out, in, out, mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
modecheck_find_matching_modes([], _PredId, _Procs, _ArgVars,
MatchingProcIds, MatchingProcIds,
WaitingVars, WaitingVars, ModeInfo, ModeInfo).
modecheck_find_matching_modes([ProcId | ProcIds], PredId, Procs, ArgVars0,
MatchingProcIds0, MatchingProcIds,
WaitingVars0, WaitingVars, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
% find the initial insts and the final livenesses
% of the arguments for this mode of the called pred
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, ProcInfo),
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo),
proc_info_arglives(ProcInfo, ModuleInfo, ProcArgLives0),
% check whether the livenesses of the args matches their
% expected liveness
modecheck_var_list_is_live(ArgVars0, ProcArgLives0, 0,
ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
% check whether the insts of the args matches their expected
% initial insts
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, InitialInsts),
modecheck_var_has_inst_list(ArgVars0, InitialInsts, 0,
ModeInfo1, ModeInfo2),
% If we got an error, reset the error list
% and save the list of vars to wait on.
% Otherwise, insert the proc_id in the list of matching
% proc_ids.
mode_info_get_errors(ModeInfo2, Errors),
(
Errors = [FirstError | _]
->
MatchingProcIds1 = MatchingProcIds0,
mode_info_set_errors([], ModeInfo2, ModeInfo3),
FirstError = mode_error_info(ErrorWaitingVars, _, _, _),
set__union(WaitingVars0, ErrorWaitingVars, WaitingVars1)
;
MatchingProcIds1 = [ProcId | MatchingProcIds0],
ModeInfo3 = ModeInfo2,
WaitingVars1 = WaitingVars0
),
% keep trying with the other modes for the called pred
modecheck_find_matching_modes(ProcIds, PredId, Procs, ArgVars0,
MatchingProcIds1, MatchingProcIds,
WaitingVars1, WaitingVars, ModeInfo3, ModeInfo).
:- pred modecheck_end_of_call(proc_info, list(prog_var), int,
list(prog_var), extra_goals, mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode modecheck_end_of_call(in, in, in, out, out,
mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
modecheck_end_of_call(ProcInfo, ArgVars0, ArgOffset,
ArgVars, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, InitialInsts),
mode_list_get_final_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, FinalInsts),
modecheck_set_var_inst_list(ArgVars0, InitialInsts, FinalInsts,
ArgOffset, ArgVars, ExtraGoals, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo1),
proc_info_never_succeeds(ProcInfo, NeverSucceeds),
( NeverSucceeds = yes ->
instmap__init_unreachable(Instmap),
mode_info_set_instmap(Instmap, ModeInfo1, ModeInfo)
;
ModeInfo = ModeInfo1
).
:- pred insert_new_mode(pred_id, list(prog_var), maybe(determinism), proc_id,
mode_info, mode_info).
:- mode insert_new_mode(in, in, in, out, mode_info_di, mode_info_uo) is det.
% Insert a new inferred mode for a predicate.
% The initial insts are determined by using a normalised
% version of the call pattern (i.e. the insts of the arg vars).
% The final insts are initially just assumed to be all `not_reached'.
% The determinism for this mode will be inferred.
insert_new_mode(PredId, ArgVars, MaybeDet, ProcId, ModeInfo0, ModeInfo) :-
% figure out the values of all the variables we need to
% create a new mode for this predicate
get_var_insts_and_lives(ArgVars, ModeInfo0, InitialInsts, ArgLives),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo0),
module_info_preds(ModuleInfo0, Preds0),
map__lookup(Preds0, PredId, PredInfo0),
pred_info_context(PredInfo0, Context),
list__length(ArgVars, Arity),
list__duplicate(Arity, not_reached, FinalInsts),
inst_lists_to_mode_list(InitialInsts, FinalInsts, Modes),
%
% call unify_proc__request_proc, which will
% create the new procedure, set its "can-process" flag to `no',
% and insert it into the queue of requested procedures.
%
unify_proc__request_proc(PredId, Modes, yes(ArgLives), MaybeDet,
Context, ModuleInfo0, ProcId, ModuleInfo),
mode_info_set_module_info(ModeInfo0, ModuleInfo, ModeInfo1),
% Since we've created a new inferred mode for this predicate,
% things have changed, so we will need to do at least one more
% pass of the fixpoint analysis.
mode_info_set_changed_flag(yes, ModeInfo1, ModeInfo).
:- pred get_var_insts_and_lives(list(prog_var), mode_info,
list(inst), list(is_live)).
:- mode get_var_insts_and_lives(in, mode_info_ui, out, out) is det.
get_var_insts_and_lives([], _, [], []).
get_var_insts_and_lives([Var | Vars], ModeInfo,
[Inst | Insts], [IsLive | IsLives]) :-
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo, ModuleInfo),
mode_info_get_instmap(ModeInfo, InstMap),
mode_info_get_var_types(ModeInfo, VarTypes),
instmap__lookup_var(InstMap, Var, Inst0),
map__lookup(VarTypes, Var, Type),
normalise_inst(Inst0, Type, ModuleInfo, Inst),
mode_info_var_is_live(ModeInfo, Var, IsLive0),
( IsLive0 = live ->
IsLive = live
;
% To reduce the potentially exponential explosion in the
% number of modes, we only set IsLive to `dead' - meaning
% that the procedure requires its argument to be dead, so
% that it can do destructive update - if there really is
% a good chance of being able to do destructive update.
(
inst_is_ground(ModuleInfo, Inst),
inst_is_mostly_unique(ModuleInfo, Inst)
->
IsLive = dead
;
IsLive = live
)
),
get_var_insts_and_lives(Vars, ModeInfo, Insts, IsLives).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% Given two modes of a predicate, figure out whether
% they are indistinguishable; that is, whether any valid call to
% one mode would also be a valid call to the other.
% (If so, it is a mode error.)
% Note that mode declarations which only have different final insts
% do not count as distinguishable.
%
% The code for this is similar to the code for
% modes_are_indentical/4 and compare_proc/5 below.
%
modes_are_indistinguishable(ProcId, OtherProcId, PredInfo, ModuleInfo) :-
pred_info_procedures(PredInfo, Procs),
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, ProcInfo),
map__lookup(Procs, OtherProcId, OtherProcInfo),
%
% Compare the initial insts of the arguments
%
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
proc_info_argmodes(OtherProcInfo, OtherProcArgModes),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, InitialInsts),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo,
OtherInitialInsts),
compare_inst_list(InitialInsts, OtherInitialInsts, no,
CompareInsts, ModuleInfo),
CompareInsts = same,
%
% Compare the expected livenesses of the arguments
%
get_arg_lives(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, ProcArgLives),
get_arg_lives(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, OtherProcArgLives),
compare_liveness_list(ProcArgLives, OtherProcArgLives, CompareLives),
CompareLives = same,
%
% Compare the determinisms --
% If both are cc_, or if both are not cc_,
% then they are indistinguishable.
%
proc_info_interface_determinism(ProcInfo, Detism),
proc_info_interface_determinism(OtherProcInfo, OtherDetism),
determinism_components(Detism, _CanFail, Solns),
determinism_components(OtherDetism, _OtherCanFail, OtherSolns),
( Solns = at_most_many_cc, OtherSolns = at_most_many_cc
; Solns \= at_most_many_cc, OtherSolns \= at_most_many_cc
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% Given two modes of a predicate, figure out whether
% they are identical, except that one is cc_nondet/cc_multi
% and the other is nondet/multi.
%
% The code for this is similar to the code for compare_proc/5 below
% and modes_are_indistinguishable/4 above.
%
modes_are_identical_bar_cc(ProcId, OtherProcId, PredInfo, ModuleInfo) :-
pred_info_procedures(PredInfo, Procs),
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, ProcInfo),
map__lookup(Procs, OtherProcId, OtherProcInfo),
%
% Compare the initial insts of the arguments
%
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
proc_info_argmodes(OtherProcInfo, OtherProcArgModes),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, InitialInsts),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo,
OtherInitialInsts),
compare_inst_list(InitialInsts, OtherInitialInsts, no,
CompareInitialInsts, ModuleInfo),
CompareInitialInsts = same,
%
% Compare the final insts of the arguments
%
mode_list_get_final_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, FinalInsts),
mode_list_get_final_insts(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo,
OtherFinalInsts),
compare_inst_list(FinalInsts, OtherFinalInsts, no,
CompareFinalInsts, ModuleInfo),
CompareFinalInsts = same,
%
% Compare the expected livenesses of the arguments
%
get_arg_lives(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, ProcArgLives),
get_arg_lives(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, OtherProcArgLives),
compare_liveness_list(ProcArgLives, OtherProcArgLives, CompareLives),
CompareLives = same,
%
% Compare the determinisms, ignoring the cc part.
%
proc_info_interface_determinism(ProcInfo, Detism),
proc_info_interface_determinism(OtherProcInfo, OtherDetism),
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, Solns),
determinism_components(OtherDetism, OtherCanFail, OtherSolns),
CanFail = OtherCanFail,
( Solns = OtherSolns
; Solns = at_most_many_cc, OtherSolns = at_most_many
; Solns = at_most_many, OtherSolns = at_most_many_cc
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
/*
The algorithm for choose_best_match is supposed to be equivalent
to the following specification:
1. Remove any modes that are strictly less instantiated or
less informative on input than other valid modes; eg,
prefer an (in, in, out) mode over an (out, in, out) mode,
but not necessarily over an (out, out, in) mode,
and prefer a (ground -> ...) mode over a (any -> ...) mode,
and prefer a (bound(f) -> ...) mode over a (ground -> ...) mode,
and prefer a (... -> dead) mode over a (... -> not dead) mode.
Also prefer a (any -> ...) mode over a (free -> ...) mode,
unless the actual argument is free, in which case prefer
the (free -> ...) mode.
2. If neither is prefered over the other by step 1, then
prioritize them by determinism, according to the standard
partial order (best first):
erroneous
/ \
det failure
/ \ /
multi semidet
\ /
nondet
3. If there are still multiple possibilities, take them in
declaration order.
*/
:- type match
---> better
; worse
; same
; incomparable.
:- pred choose_best_match(list(proc_id), pred_id, proc_table, list(prog_var),
proc_id, mode_info).
:- mode choose_best_match(in, in, in, in, out,
mode_info_ui) is det.
choose_best_match([], _, _, _, _, _) :-
error("choose_best_match: no best match").
choose_best_match([ProcId | ProcIds], PredId, Procs, ArgVars, TheProcId,
ModeInfo) :-
%
% This ProcId is best iff there is no other proc_id which is better.
%
(
\+ (
list__member(OtherProcId, ProcIds),
compare_proc(OtherProcId, ProcId, ArgVars, better,
Procs, ModeInfo)
)
->
TheProcId = ProcId
;
choose_best_match(ProcIds, PredId, Procs, ArgVars, TheProcId,
ModeInfo)
).
%
% Given two modes of a predicate, figure out whether
% one of them is a better match than the other,
% for calls which could match either mode.
%
% The code for this is similar to the code for
% modes_are_indistinguishable/4 and
% modes_are_identical_bar_cc/4 above.
%
:- pred compare_proc(proc_id, proc_id, list(prog_var), match, proc_table,
mode_info).
:- mode compare_proc(in, in, in, out, in, mode_info_ui) is det.
compare_proc(ProcId, OtherProcId, ArgVars, Compare, Procs, ModeInfo) :-
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, ProcInfo),
map__lookup(Procs, OtherProcId, OtherProcInfo),
%
% Compare the initial insts of the arguments
%
proc_info_argmodes(ProcInfo, ProcArgModes),
proc_info_argmodes(OtherProcInfo, OtherProcArgModes),
mode_info_get_module_info(ModeInfo, ModuleInfo),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, InitialInsts),
mode_list_get_initial_insts(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo,
OtherInitialInsts),
get_var_insts_and_lives(ArgVars, ModeInfo, ArgInitialInsts, _ArgLives),
compare_inst_list(InitialInsts, OtherInitialInsts, yes(ArgInitialInsts),
CompareInsts, ModuleInfo),
%
% Compare the expected livenesses of the arguments
%
get_arg_lives(ProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, ProcArgLives),
get_arg_lives(OtherProcArgModes, ModuleInfo, OtherProcArgLives),
compare_liveness_list(ProcArgLives, OtherProcArgLives, CompareLives),
%
% Compare the determinisms
%
proc_info_interface_determinism(ProcInfo, Detism),
proc_info_interface_determinism(OtherProcInfo, OtherDetism),
compare_determinisms(Detism, OtherDetism, CompareDet0),
( CompareDet0 = tighter, CompareDet = better
; CompareDet0 = looser, CompareDet = worse
; CompareDet0 = sameas, CompareDet = same
),
%
% Combine the results, with the insts & lives comparisons
% taking priority over the determinism comparison.
%
combine_results(CompareInsts, CompareLives, Compare0),
prioritized_combine_results(Compare0, CompareDet, Compare).
:- pred compare_inst_list(list(inst), list(inst), maybe(list(inst)), match,
module_info).
:- mode compare_inst_list(in, in, in, out, in) is det.
compare_inst_list(InstsA, InstsB, ArgInsts, Result, ModuleInfo) :-
( compare_inst_list_2(InstsA, InstsB, ArgInsts, Result0, ModuleInfo) ->
Result = Result0
;
error("compare_inst_list: length mis-match")
).
:- pred compare_inst_list_2(list(inst), list(inst), maybe(list(inst)), match,
module_info).
:- mode compare_inst_list_2(in, in, in, out, in) is semidet.
compare_inst_list_2([], [], _, same, _).
compare_inst_list_2([InstA | InstsA], [InstB | InstsB],
no, Result, ModuleInfo) :-
compare_inst(InstA, InstB, no, Result0, ModuleInfo),
compare_inst_list_2(InstsA, InstsB, no, Result1, ModuleInfo),
combine_results(Result0, Result1, Result).
compare_inst_list_2([InstA | InstsA], [InstB | InstsB],
yes([ArgInst|ArgInsts]), Result, ModuleInfo) :-
compare_inst(InstA, InstB, yes(ArgInst), Result0, ModuleInfo),
compare_inst_list_2(InstsA, InstsB, yes(ArgInsts), Result1, ModuleInfo),
combine_results(Result0, Result1, Result).
:- pred compare_liveness_list(list(is_live), list(is_live), match).
:- mode compare_liveness_list(in, in, out) is det.
compare_liveness_list([], [], same).
compare_liveness_list([_|_], [], _) :-
error("compare_liveness_list: length mis-match").
compare_liveness_list([], [_|_], _) :-
error("compare_liveness_list: length mis-match").
compare_liveness_list([LiveA | LiveAs], [LiveB | LiveBs], Result) :-
compare_liveness(LiveA, LiveB, Result0),
compare_liveness_list(LiveAs, LiveBs, Result1),
combine_results(Result0, Result1, Result).
%
% compare_liveness -- prefer dead to live
% (if either is a valid match, then the actual argument
% must be dead, so prefer the mode which can take advantage
% of that).
%
:- pred compare_liveness(is_live, is_live, match).
:- mode compare_liveness(in, in, out) is det.
compare_liveness(dead, dead, same).
compare_liveness(dead, live, better).
compare_liveness(live, dead, worse).
compare_liveness(live, live, same).
%
% combine two results, giving priority to the first one
%
:- pred prioritized_combine_results(match, match, match).
:- mode prioritized_combine_results(in, in, out) is det.
prioritized_combine_results(better, _, better).
prioritized_combine_results(worse, _, worse).
prioritized_combine_results(same, Result, Result).
prioritized_combine_results(incomparable, _, incomparable).
%
% combine two results, giving them equal priority
%
:- pred combine_results(match, match, match).
:- mode combine_results(in, in, out) is det.
combine_results(better, better, better).
combine_results(better, same, better).
combine_results(better, worse, incomparable).
combine_results(better, incomparable, incomparable).
combine_results(worse, worse, worse).
combine_results(worse, same, worse).
combine_results(worse, better, incomparable).
combine_results(worse, incomparable, incomparable).
combine_results(same, Result, Result).
combine_results(incomparable, _, incomparable).
%
% Compare two initial insts, to figure out which would be a better
% match.
%
% More information is better:
% prefer bound(f) to ground
% prefer unique to mostly_unique or ground, and
% prefer mostly_unique to ground
% (unique > mostly_unique > shared > mostly_dead > dead)
% More bound is better:
% (if both can match, the one which is more bound
% is better, because it may be an exact match, whereas
% the other one would be an implied mode)
% prefer ground to free (i.e. prefer in to out)
% prefer ground to any (e.g. prefer in to in(any))
% prefer any to free (e.g. prefer any->ground to out)
:- pred compare_inst(inst, inst, maybe(inst), match, module_info).
:- mode compare_inst(in, in, in, out, in) is det.
compare_inst(InstA, InstB, MaybeArgInst, Result, ModuleInfo) :-
% inst_matches_initial(A,B) succeeds iff
% A specifies at least as much information
% and at least as much binding as B --
% with the exception that `any' matches_initial `free'
% and perhaps vice versa.
( inst_matches_initial(InstA, InstB, ModuleInfo) ->
A_mi_B = yes
;
A_mi_B = no
),
( inst_matches_initial(InstB, InstA, ModuleInfo) ->
B_mi_A = yes
;
B_mi_A = no
),
( A_mi_B = yes, B_mi_A = no, Result = better
; A_mi_B = no, B_mi_A = yes, Result = worse
; A_mi_B = no, B_mi_A = no, Result = incomparable
; A_mi_B = yes, B_mi_A = yes,
%
% We need to further disambiguate the cases involving
% `any' and `free', since `any' matches_initial `free'
% and vice versa. For these cases, we want to take
% the actual inst of the argument into account:
% if the argument is `free', we should prefer `free',
% but otherwise, we should prefer `any'.
%
(
MaybeArgInst = no,
Result0 = same
;
MaybeArgInst = yes(ArgInst),
(
inst_matches_final(ArgInst, InstA, ModuleInfo)
->
Arg_mf_A = yes
;
Arg_mf_A = no
),
(
inst_matches_final(ArgInst, InstB, ModuleInfo)
->
Arg_mf_B = yes
;
Arg_mf_B = no
),
( Arg_mf_A = yes, Arg_mf_B = no, Result0 = better
; Arg_mf_A = no, Arg_mf_B = yes, Result0 = worse
; Arg_mf_A = yes, Arg_mf_B = yes, Result0 = same
; Arg_mf_A = no, Arg_mf_B = no, Result0 = same
)
),
( Result0 = same ->
%
% if the actual arg inst is not available,
% or comparing with the arg inst doesn't help,
% then compare the two proc insts
%
( inst_matches_final(InstA, InstB, ModuleInfo) ->
A_mf_B = yes
;
A_mf_B = no
),
( inst_matches_final(InstB, InstA, ModuleInfo) ->
B_mf_A = yes
;
B_mf_A = no
),
( A_mf_B = yes, B_mf_A = no, Result = better
; A_mf_B = no, B_mf_A = yes, Result = worse
; A_mf_B = no, B_mf_A = no, Result = incomparable
; A_mf_B = yes, B_mf_A = yes, Result = same
)
;
Result = Result0
)
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|