File: gr_nullable_unique_key_conflict.test

package info (click to toggle)
mysql-8.0 8.0.43-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sid
  • size: 1,273,924 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 4,684,605; ansic: 412,450; pascal: 108,398; java: 83,641; perl: 30,221; cs: 27,067; sql: 26,594; sh: 24,181; python: 21,816; yacc: 17,169; php: 11,522; xml: 7,388; javascript: 7,076; makefile: 2,194; lex: 1,075; awk: 670; asm: 520; objc: 183; ruby: 97; lisp: 86
file content (258 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 10,588 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
################################################################################
# Bug #24479782 GR UNABLE TO DETECT CONFLICTS WHEN INSERTING SAME VALUE INTO
#               UNIQUE COLUMN
# Test cases to verify that concurrent transactions with intersecting
# write set, NULLABLE UNIQUE KEY, do conflict and test cases to verify
# that value NULL does not participate in conflicting transactions.
#
# Test:
# 0. The test requires two servers: M1 and M2.
# 1. With both members ONLINE. Create a table on M1.
# 2. With different test combinations,
#    call gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc
#    and test the behaviour as expected or not.
#  2.1 UNIQUE KEY, NULLABLE, SINGLE COLUMN KEY,
#          conflicting case (1,2) vs (3,2).
#  2.2 UNIQUE KEY, NULLABLE, SINGLE COLUMN KEY,
#          non-conflicting case (5,6) vs (7,8).
#  2.3 UNIQUE KEY, NULLABLE, SINGLE COLUMN KEY,
#          non-conflicting case (NULL vs NULL).
#  2.4 UNIQUE KEY, NULLABLE, COMPOSITE KEY,
#          non-conflicting case (x,NULL) vs (x, NULL).
#  2.5 UNIQUE KEY, NULLABLE, COMPOSITE KEY,
#          non-conflicting case (NULL,NULL) vs (NULL, NULL).
#  2.6 FOREIGN KEY ON NULLABLE UNIQUE KEY,
#          non-conflicting case (NULL referring key while it is getting
#          updated in the parent table).
# 3. Do the tuple sanity check after test combinations.
# 4. After all the above experiments, check that server's
#    (server1's and server2's) binlog content is good for replay purpose.

################################################################################

--source include/big_test.inc
--source include/have_debug_sync.inc
--source include/have_group_replication_plugin.inc
--source include/group_replication.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Create a table with Nullable UNIQUEY KEY
CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT PRIMARY KEY, c2 INT UNIQUE KEY);
--source include/rpl_sync.inc

--echo
--echo ###########################################################
--echo # Scenario 1: UNIQUE NULL KEY, conflicting case
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 2)
--let $remote_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (3, 2)
--let $conflict_test=1
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Scenario 2: UNIQUE NULL KEY, non-conflicting case
--echo
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (5, 6)
--let $remote_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (7, 8)
--let $conflict_test=0
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Check the data sanity
--let $rpl_connection_name= server1
--source include/rpl_connection.inc
--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 = 3 AND t1.c2 = 2, count, 1]" = "1"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 = 5 AND t1.c2 = 6, count, 1]" = "1"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 = 7 AND t1.c2 = 8, count, 1]" = "1"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain 3 rows after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1]" = "3"
--source include/assert.inc

--echo
--echo ##################################################################
--echo # Scenario 3: UNIQUE NULL KEY, non-conflicting case (NULL vs NULL)
--echo
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (8, NULL)
--let $remote_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (9, NULL)
--let $conflict_test=0
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Check the data sanity
--let $rpl_connection_name= server1
--source include/rpl_connection.inc
--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 = 8 OR t1.c1 = 9, count, 1]" = "2"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain 5 rows after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1]" = "5"
--source include/assert.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Create a table with composite UNIQUE KEY on server1.
DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT PRIMARY KEY, c2 INT, c3 INT, UNIQUE KEY(c2,c3));
--source include/rpl_sync.inc

--echo
--echo ##################################################################
--echo # Scenario 4: COMPOSITE UNIQUE KEY
--echo #    non-conflicting case (x,NULL) vs (x,NULL)
--echo ##################################################################
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 2, NULL)
--let $remote_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2, 2, NULL)
--let $conflict_test=0
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ##################################################################
--echo # Scenario 5: COMPOSITE UNIQUE KEY
--echo #    (non-conflicting case (NULL,NULL) vs (NULL,NULL)
--echo ##################################################################
--echo
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (3, NULL, NULL)
--let $remote_transaction=INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4, NULL, NULL)
--let $conflict_test=0
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Check the data sanity
--let $rpl_connection_name= server1
--source include/rpl_connection.inc
--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 >=1 AND t1.c1 <= 4, count, 1]" = "4"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain 4 rows after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1]" = "4"
--source include/assert.inc

--echo
--echo ###################################################################
--echo # Create two tables (parent and child) and create a foreign key in
--echo # child table that refers Nullable Unique key of the parent table
DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT PRIMARY KEY, c2 INT UNIQUE KEY);
CREATE TABLE t2 (c1 INT PRIMARY KEY, c2 INT, FOREIGN KEY (c2) REFERENCES t1(c2));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, NULL);
--source include/rpl_sync.inc

--echo
--echo ##################################################################
--echo # Scenario 6: Non-conflicting case (NULL tuple does not care for
--echo #  a matching tuple in parent table)
--echo
--let $local_server_connection1=server1
--let $local_server_connection2=server_1
--let $remote_server_connection=server2
--let $local_transaction= UPDATE t1 SET c2=10
--let $remote_transaction= INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, NULL);
--let $conflict_test=0
--source include/gr_parallel_local_and_remote_transactions.inc

--echo
--echo ############################################################
--echo # Check the data sanity
--let $rpl_connection_name= server1
--source include/rpl_connection.inc
--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t1 WHERE t1.c1 =1 AND t1.c2 = 10, count, 1]" = "1"
--source include/assert.inc

--let $assert_text= Table t1 will contain row after the above execution
--let $assert_cond= "[SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM t2 WHERE t2.c1 =1, count, 1]" = "1"
--source include/assert.inc

--echo
--echo ######################################################################
--echo # Scenario 7: After all the above experiments, check that server's
--echo # (server1's and server2's) binlog content is good for replay purpose.
--echo

# Switch off the GR and binlog before going for replay.
--source include/stop_group_replication.inc
SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0;
# Create backup for t1 and t2 tables
RENAME TABLE t2 TO t4;
RENAME TABLE t1 TO t3;
# Check Server1's binlog.
--exec $MYSQL_BINLOG --force-if-open $server_1_datadir/server-binary-log.000001 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql
# Before replaying, RESET MASTER, so that GTID numbers are cleared and server
# state is ready for replay.
RESET MASTER;
# Replay the binlog content.
--exec $MYSQL --user=root --host=127.0.0.1 --port=$SERVER_MYPORT_1 < $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql

# Compare the data with our backup.
--let $diff_tables= server1:t1,server1:t3
--source include/diff_tables.inc

--let $diff_tables= server1:t2,server1:t4
--source include/diff_tables.inc

# Delete the tables so that server state is ready for next test case.
DROP TABLE t2, t1;

# Check Server2's binlog.
--exec $MYSQL_BINLOG --force-if-open $server_2_datadir/server-binary-log.000001 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql
# Before replaying, RESET MASTER, so that GTID numbers are cleared and server
# state is ready for replay.
RESET MASTER;
# Replay the binlog content.
--exec $MYSQL --user=root --host=127.0.0.1 --port=$SERVER_MYPORT_1 < $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql

# Compare the data with our backup.
--let $diff_tables= server1:t1,server1:t3
--source include/diff_tables.inc

--let $diff_tables= server1:t2,server1:t4
--source include/diff_tables.inc

# Delete the tables so that server state is ready for next test case.
DROP TABLE t4, t3, t2, t1;

# Put back to the original server state after the above experiments.
RESET MASTER;
--exec $MYSQL --user=root --host=127.0.0.1 --port=$SERVER_MYPORT_1 < $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql
SET SQL_LOG_BIN=1;
--source include/start_group_replication.inc

--echo
--echo ############
--echo # Cleanup
--echo
DROP TABLE t2;
DROP TABLE t1;
--remove_file $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/binlog_replay.sql

--source include/group_replication_end.inc