File: Access.crash-me

package info (click to toggle)
mysql-dfsg 4.0.24-10sarge3
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sarge
  • size: 56,212 kB
  • ctags: 42,312
  • sloc: ansic: 257,918; cpp: 93,002; perl: 29,480; sh: 24,628; tcl: 19,882; yacc: 3,558; makefile: 2,452; java: 2,300; awk: 1,484; asm: 687; sed: 428; sql: 27
file content (40 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,569 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (25)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Access 97 tested through ODBC 1998.04.19, by monty@mysql.com

Access 97 has a bug when on executes a SELECT follwed very fast with a
DROP TABLE or a DROP INDEX command:

[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access 97 Driver] The database engine couldn't lock table 'crash_q' because it's already in use by another person or process. (SQL-S1
000)(DBD: st_execute/SQLExecute err=-1)

Debugging SQL queries in Access 97 is terrible because most error messages
are of type:

Error: [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access 97 Driver] Syntax error in CREATE TABLE statement. (SQL-37000)(DBD: st_prepare/SQLPrepare err=-1)

Which doesn't tell a thing!

--------------

Access 2000 tested through ODBC 2000.01.02, by monty@mysql.com

crash-me takes a LONG time to run under Access 2000.

The '1+NULL' and the 'OR and AND in WHERE' tests kills
Activestate Perl, build 521, DBI-DBC with an OUT OF MEMORY error.  
The later test also kills perl/access with some internal errors.
To go around this one must run crash-me repeatedly with the --restart option.

Testing of the 'constant string size' (< 500K) takes a LOT of memory
in Access (at least 250M on My computer).

Testing of number of 'simple expressions' takes REALLY a lot of time
and memory;  At some point I was up to 350M of used memory!

To fix the above, I modified crash-me to have lower max limits in the
above tests.

Benchmarks (under Win98):

Running the connect-test will take up all available memory and this
will not be freed even after quitting perl!  There is probably some
bug in the Access connect code that eats memory!