File: try-catch.js

package info (click to toggle)
node-terser 5.46.1-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sid
  • size: 4,248 kB
  • sloc: javascript: 101,516; makefile: 52; perl: 48; sh: 13
file content (135 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,974 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
catch_destructuring_with_sequence: {
    beautify = {
        ecma: 2015
    }
    input: {
        try {
            throw {};
        } catch ({xCover = (0, function() {})} ) {
        }
    }
    expect_exact: "try{throw{}}catch({xCover=(0,function(){})}){}"
}

broken_safari_catch_scope: {
    mangle = {
        safari10: true,
    }
    input: {
        "AAAAAAAA";
        "BBBBBBB";
        new class {
            f(x) {
                try {
                    throw {
                        m: "PASS"
                    };
                } catch ({m: s}) {
                    console.log(s);
                }
            }
        }().f();
    }
    expect: {
        "AAAAAAAA";
        "BBBBBBB";
        new class {
            f(A) {
                try {
                    throw {
                        m: "PASS"
                    };
                } catch ({m: B}) {
                    console.log(B);
                }
            }
        }().f();
    }
    expect_stdout: "PASS"
}

broken_safari_catch_scope_caveat: {
    // The `input` of this test reportedly fails on Safari 10+ despite
    // being valid ECMAScript.
    // The `expect`ed output of this test will also fail on Safari 10+
    // despite of the `safari10` `mangle` option being enabled.
    // This test just exists to prove that both forms will run correctly
    // on ES spec compliant engines such as V8.

    mangle = {
        safari10: true,
    }
    input: {
        "AAAAAAAA";
        "BBBBBBB";
        new class {
            f(x) {
                try {
                    throw {
                        m: "PASS"
                    };
                } catch ({m: x}) {
                    console.log(x);
                }
            }
        }().f();
    }
    expect: {
        "AAAAAAAA";
        "BBBBBBB";
        new class {
            f(A) {
                try {
                    throw {
                        m: "PASS"
                    };
                } catch ({m: A}) {
                    console.log(A);
                }
            }
        }().f();
    }
    expect_stdout: "PASS"
}

parameterless_catch: {
    input: {
        try {
            unknown();
        } catch {
            console.log("PASS");
        }
    }
    expect_exact: 'try{unknown()}catch{console.log("PASS")}'
    expect_stdout: "PASS"
}

parent_scope_of_catch_block_is_not_the_try_block: {
    mangle = {}
    input: {
        function test(foo, bar) {
            try {
                const bar = {};
                throw 'PASS'
            } catch (error) {
                return bar(error);
            }
        }
        console.log(test(null, x => x));
    }
    expect_stdout: "PASS"
}

issue_452: {
    options = {
        toplevel: true,
        unused: true
    }
    input: {
        try {
            const arr = ['PASS'];
            for (const x of arr) { console.log(x) }
        } catch(e) { }
    }
    expect_stdout: 'PASS'
}