1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287
|
#include <string.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "ber.h"
/* berSequence - sequences are wrappers for other encoded pieces of data.
* basically all that they do is give mark their beginning and have a length.
* the tricky bit is that they can be recursive. This is the real reason for
* mbufs.
* You sort of insert the other information into the sequence. The ber encoded
* information that you insert into a sequence is assumed to be owned by the
* sequence. It actually throws it away very shortly and just keeps the mbufs.
*/
BerSequence::~BerSequence(){
for(BerBase *cur=head; cur!=NULL; ){
BerBase *tmp=cur;
cur=cur->next;
delete tmp;
}
}
BerSequence::BerSequence(unsigned char *str){
head=NULL;
tail=NULL;
assert(str[0]&CONSTRUCTOR_TAG);
unsigned char headlen;
tag=(Tags)str[0];
seqlen=unpack_len(str,headlen);
/* startdata modifies the value of headlen and in so doing can foul up the
rest of the processing of the datastream if the host that is responding
returns something like 30 82 00 ef instead of 30 81 ef */
unsigned char headlen2=headlen;
assert(edatacache=new BerEncodedData(start_data((Tags)str[0],seqlen,
headlen2),headlen));
// shorten the string because start_data creates a space big enough for the
// data as well.
edatacache->Data((unsigned char*)realloc(edatacache->Data(),headlen));
for(unsigned char *curpos=str+headlen;curpos<str+headlen+seqlen;
curpos+=tail->fulllen()){
BerBase *newone;
// char tmpbuf[10240];
// int tmplen;
switch(*curpos){
case INT_TAG:
case COUNTER_TAG:
newone=new BerInt(curpos);
// tmplen=newone->print(tmpbuf,10239);
// tmpbuf[tmplen]=0;
// printf("%s\n\n",tmpbuf);
break;
case STRING_TAG:
newone=new BerString(curpos);
break;
case NULL_TAG:
newone=new BerNull(curpos);
break;
case OID_TAG:
newone=new BerOid(curpos);
break;
case TIME_TICK_TAG:
newone=new BerTimeTick(curpos);
break;
case IPADDR_TAG:
newone=new BerIPAddr(curpos);
break;
default:
newone=new BerSequence(curpos);
}
assert(newone);
if(head==NULL)
tail=head=newone;
else {
tail->next=newone;
tail=tail->next;
}
}
}
BerEncodedData *BerSequence::getdata(){
if(edatacache==NULL){
unsigned char headlen;
unsigned char *tmp=start_data(tag,seqlen,headlen);
tmp=(unsigned char*)realloc(tmp,headlen);
assert(edatacache=new BerEncodedData(tmp,headlen));
}
if(edatacache->next==NULL){
BerEncodedData *tail=edatacache;
for(BerBase *cur=head;cur!=NULL; cur=cur->next){
tail->next=cur->getdata();
while(tail->next)
tail=tail->next; // walk to the end of the list.
}
}
return edatacache;
}
BerEncodedData *BerSequence::encode(){
BerEncodedData *datlisthead=NULL,*curdat=NULL,*bedtail=NULL;
// string up the data
for(BerBase *cur=head; cur!=NULL; cur=cur->next){
// go to the end of the list.
curdat=cur->getdata();
if(datlisthead==NULL){
datlisthead=bedtail=curdat;
}else{
bedtail->next=curdat;
bedtail=bedtail->next;
}
while(bedtail->next)
bedtail=bedtail->next;
}
// encode the data
unsigned char headerlen;
unsigned char *retval=start_data(tag,seqlen,headerlen);
unsigned char *curpos=retval+headerlen;
for(curdat=datlisthead; curdat!=NULL;
curpos+=curdat->Length(), curdat=curdat->next){
memcpy(curpos, curdat->Data(), curdat->Length());
}
return new BerEncodedData(retval,seqlen+headerlen);
}
BerSequence::BerSequence(Tags newtag, unsigned int entries ...){
va_list berObs;
va_start(berObs,entries);
tag=newtag;
if(entries==0){
head=tail=NULL;
return;
}
BerBase *curBer=va_arg(berObs,BerBase*);
assert(curBer);
head=tail=curBer;
seqlen=curBer->fulllen();
//only count down to one because we have already taken one.
for(;entries>1;entries--){
curBer=va_arg(berObs,BerBase*);
assert(curBer);
seqlen+=curBer->fulllen();
tail->next=curBer;
tail=tail->next;
}
va_end(berObs);
}
// /* never tested */
// BerSequence::prepend(unsigned int num ...){
// va_list newones;
// va_start(newones,num);
// BerBase *newlist,*newtail;
// newtail=newlist=va_arg(newones,BerBase*);
// assert(newlist);
// seqlen+=newlist->fulllen();
// for(;num>1;num--){
// BerBase *curber=va_arg(newones,BerBase*);
// assert(curber);x
// seqlen+=curber->fulllen();
// newtail->next=curber;
// newtail=newtail->next;
// }
// newtail->next=head;
// head=newlist;
// va_end(newones);
// }
void BerSequence::append(unsigned int num ...){
va_list newones;
va_start(newones,num);
if(head==NULL){
head=tail=va_arg(newones,BerBase*);
seqlen=tail->fulllen();
num--;
}
while(num--){
tail->next=va_arg(newones,BerBase*);
assert(tail->next);
tail=tail->next;
seqlen+=tail->fulllen();
}
va_end(newones);
}
BerBase *BerSequence::peek(unsigned int num){
BerBase *cur;
for(cur=head;num && cur!=NULL;num--,cur=cur->next);
return cur;
}
BerBase *BerSequence::extract(unsigned int num){
BerBase *cur,*prev=NULL;
for(cur=head;num && cur!=NULL;num--,cur=cur->next)
prev=cur;
if(cur==NULL) return NULL;
// remove its length
/* The inital approach was to just subtract the fulllen but fullen walks
the list of the encoded data and so in effect it returns the remainder
of the sequence. Thus the sequence is too short. This subtracts the
correct amount and leaves the semantics of fulllen the same. However, I
am not sure that is the right thing to do. It might be worth it to change
the functioning of fulllen but I didn't want to take the time to figure
out all the other ways that might affect the code. */
unsigned char headlen;
seqlen-=unpack_len(cur->edatacache->Data(),headlen);
seqlen-=headlen;
/* got to fix up edatacache so that it matches current data */
unsigned char *newdat=start_data((Tags)(edatacache->Data())[0],seqlen,
headlen);
assert(newdat=(unsigned char*)realloc(newdat,headlen));
BerEncodedData *oldedc=edatacache;
assert(edatacache=new BerEncodedData(newdat,headlen));
edatacache->next=oldedc->next;
delete oldedc;
BerEncodedData *oldend;
if(cur==head){
head=head->next;
} else {
prev->next=cur->next;
/* find the entry that is cur's edatacache
and set it to the value of cur->next->edatacache
kind of sew the lists together */
if(cur->next!=NULL){
for(oldend=prev->edatacache;oldend->next!=cur->edatacache;
oldend=oldend->next){
assert(oldend->next!=NULL); /* I don't know what this would mean. If
it ever comes up. I guess I will have
to deal with it. */
}
oldend->next=cur->next->edatacache;
}
}
// make is so that cur->edatacache list doesn't merge into this list
if(cur->next){
for(oldend=cur->edatacache; oldend->next!=cur->next->edatacache;
oldend=oldend->next);
oldend->next=NULL;
}
if(cur==tail){
tail=prev;
}
cur->next=NULL;
return cur;
}
int BerSequence::print(char *buf, unsigned int len){
len-=2;
if(!len) return -1;
buf[0]='(';
buf[1]=' ';
buf+=2;
int totlen=1;
for( BerBase *cur=head; cur!=NULL; cur=cur->next){
int i=cur->print(buf,len);
if(i==-1) return -1;
len-=i+1;
buf+=i;
buf[0]=' ';
buf++;
totlen+=i+1;
}
if(!--len) return -1;
buf[0]=')';
buf[1]=' ';
return totlen+2;
}
|