File: CONTRIBUTING

package info (click to toggle)
opendmarc 1.4.2-5.1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid
  • size: 9,900 kB
  • sloc: xml: 291,627; ansic: 14,128; perl: 2,384; sh: 460; makefile: 213; python: 58
file content (69 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 3,392 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
# Contributing to OpenDMARC

This document attempts to list some things potential contributors can do to
offer contributions to the OpenDMARC and other Trusted Domain Project 
projects.  

An active user community is the basis for many open source projects, and 
while open source is often thankless, and the developers have busy lives, 
we aim for regular, consistent releases that contain all the features 
suggested in the relevant RFCs and specifications, and that work on a good 
variety of operating systems.

## Things you can do

* Our sourceforge projects are going away, but many issues have either been
  duplicated or obsoleted by code that has been contributed since the move
  to github.  Helping to triage remaining issues, and adding comments to the
  Sourceforge issues is incredibly helpful.

* We use the "needs-testing" tag on our GitHub issues to indicate issues that
  we believe resolved, but want to confirm are fixed for the original
  reporter.  If you run an environment similar to the reporter, and can
  reproduce the failure mode, more testing is useful, especially in the
  case where the origninal reporter has not responded.

* Reporting compiler warnings on your platform (along with the platform and 
  version) is helpful.  Our goal is for a zero-warnings compile on most
  platforms.

* If you find an OS packager is patching OpenDMARC after our releases, open
  an issue to let us know how we can include those fixes in our main release.

* Our code has some unit tests which are useful, but more are always helpful.
  There are both "live" tests which fire up a copy of opendmarc and fire test
  messages against it, as well as unit tests which test individual functions
  in the code.

* If you wish to run a testing version (built from the github "develop")
  branch in production, this can often expose new issues.  If you do this,
  you may want to run with extended logging, keep copies of messages, and 
  perhaps disable reporting.

* The code has the start of a PLATFORM_NOTES file where we attempt to 
  document weirdnesses about various platforms.  (e.g. FooOS uses the MUSL
  c libraries by default, BarOS does not have stringfunc.blah).  We welcome
  more knowledge about this.

## Contributing code guidelines

* The opendmarc code is in Autoconf, Automake, M4, and C, with the reporting
  functions in perl, and some of the unit tests written in Lua.  If you 
  find that there are more consistent standards that some of these 
  languages use, we would like to know about it via a GitHub Issue, or,
  preferably, a pull request.

* There is a file called ".editorconfig" in the top level of our GitHub
  repository.  It contains preferences for editors to use, but not all editors
  know how to use this file out of the box.

* The best way to offer contributions is by submitted a GitHub pull request.
  Specifically, you should clone the "develop" branch, as "master" reflects
  the most recent release, but pending work happens in "develop".  Pull 
  requests should target this branch.

* If you clone our GitHub repo for your own use, please create a new branch
  for each enhancement.  While it is possible to "cherry-pick" multiple commits
  out of a merge request, the GitHub web UI doesn't make it particularly easy.
  It's way easier to do this if commits are one-branch-per-issue on the
  "requesting" or "contributing" side.