1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
|
/*
* Copyright (c) 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/**
* @test
* @bug 8331717
* @summary C2: Crash with SIGFPE
*
* @run main/othervm -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,*TestLoopPredicationDivZeroCheck*::* -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xbatch TestLoopPredicationDivZeroCheck
*/
public class TestLoopPredicationDivZeroCheck {
static int iArr[] = new int[100];
static volatile long lFld;
static int iFld;
public static void main(String[] strArr) {
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
test();
}
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
test2();
}
}
/*
* The division 2 / i4 requires a non-zero check. As the result is an array access, it will be the input to a range
* check. Loop predication will try to move the range check and the division to right before the loop as the division
* appears to be invariant (i4 is always 0). However, the division is not truly invariant as it requires the zero
* check for i4 that can throw an exception. The bug fixed in 8331717 caused the division to still be moved before the
* for loop with the range check.
*/
static void test() {
int i1 = 0;
for (int i4 : iArr) {
i4 = i1;
try {
iArr[0] = 1 / i4;
i4 = iArr[2 / i4];
} catch (ArithmeticException a_e) {
}
}
}
/*
* Loop predication will try to move 3 / y (input to the range check for bArr[x / 30]) before its containing for loop
* but it may not as y must be zero-checked. The same problem as above occurred before the fix in 8331717.
*/
static void test2() {
int x = 0;
int y = iFld;
long lArr[] = new long[400];
boolean bArr[] = new boolean[400];
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j < 13; j++) {
for (int k = 1; k < 2; k++) {
lFld = 0;
lArr[1] = 7;
try {
x = 3 / y;
} catch (ArithmeticException a_e) {
}
bArr[x / 30] = true;
}
}
}
}
}
|