File: funcslower_example.txt

package info (click to toggle)
perf-tools-unstable 1.0%2Bgit7ffb3fd-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 932 kB
  • ctags: 95
  • sloc: sh: 2,519; perl: 278; makefile: 20
file content (110 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 4,366 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
Demonstrations of funcslower, the Linux ftrace version.


Show me ext3_readpages() calls slower than 1000 microseconds (1 ms):

# ./funcslower ext3_readpages 1000
Tracing "ext3_readpages" slower than 1000 us... Ctrl-C to end.
 0) ! 8147.120 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
 0) ! 8135.067 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
 0) ! 12202.93 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
 0) ! 12201.84 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
 0) ! 8142.667 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
 0) ! 12194.14 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
^C
Ending tracing...

Neat. So this confirms that there are ext3_readpages() calls that are taking
over 8000 us (8 ms).

funcslower uses the ftrace function graph profiler to dynamically instrument
the given kernel function, time it in-kernel, and only emit events slower
than the given latency threshold in-kernel. Since this all operates in
kernel context, the overheads are relatively low (compared to post-processing
in user space).


Now include the process name and PID (-P) of the process who is on-CPU, and the
absolute timestamp (-t) of the event:

# ./funcslower -Pt ext3_readpages 1000
Tracing "ext3_readpages" slower than 1000 us... Ctrl-C to end.
2678112.003180 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8145.268 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678113.538763 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8139.086 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678113.704901 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8147.549 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678113.721102 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8142.530 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678113.810269 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 12234.70 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678113.996625 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8146.129 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
2678114.012832 |   0)  cksum-26695   | ! 8148.153 us |  } /* ext3_readpages */
^C
Ending tracing...

Great! Now I can see the process name, which in this case is the responsible
process. The timestamps also let me determine the rate of these slow events.


Now measure time differently: excluding time spent sleeping, so that we only
see on-CPU time:

# ./funcslower -Pct ext3_readpages 1000
Tracing "ext3_readpages" slower than 1000 us... Ctrl-C to end.
^C
Ending tracing...

I believe the workload hasn't changed, so these ext3_readpages() calls are
still happening, however, their CPU time doesn't exceed 1 ms. Compared to the
earlier output, this tells me that the latency in this function is due to time
spent blocked off-CPU, and not on-CPU. This makes sense: this function is
ultimately being blocked on disk I/O.

Were the function duration times to be similar with and without -C, that would
tell us that the high latency is due to time spent on-CPU executing code.


This traces the sys_nanosleep() kernel function, and shows calls taking over
100 us:

# ./funcslower sys_nanosleep 100
Tracing "sys_nanosleep" slower than 100 us... Ctrl-C to end.
 0) ! 2000147 us |  } /* sys_nanosleep */
 ------------------------------------------
 0) registe-27414  =>  vmstat-27419 
 ------------------------------------------

 0) ! 1000143 us |  } /* sys_nanosleep */
 0) ! 1000154 us |  } /* sys_nanosleep */
 ------------------------------------------
 0)  vmstat-27419  => registe-27414 
 ------------------------------------------

 0) ! 2000183 us |  } /* sys_nanosleep */
 ------------------------------------------
 0) registe-27414  =>  vmstat-27419 
 ------------------------------------------

 0) ! 1000141 us |  } /* sys_nanosleep */
^C
Ending tracing...

This is an example where I did not use -P, but ftrace has included process
information anyway. Look for the lines containing "=>", which indicate a process
switch on the given CPU.


Use -h to print the USAGE message:

# ./funcslower -h
USAGE: funcslower [-aChHPt] [-p PID] [-d secs] funcstring latency_us
                 -a              # all info (same as -HPt)
                 -C              # measure on-CPU time only
                 -d seconds      # trace duration, and use buffers
                 -h              # this usage message
                 -H              # include column headers
                 -p PID          # trace when this pid is on-CPU
                 -L TID          # trace when this thread is on-CPU
                 -P              # show process names & PIDs
                 -t              # show timestamps
  eg,
       funcslower vfs_read 10000 # trace vfs_read() slower than 10 ms

See the man page and example file for more info.