1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285
|
#!./perl -w
require './test.pl';
use strict;
# Tests of post/pre - increment/decrement operators.
# Verify that addition/subtraction properly upgrade to doubles.
# These tests are only significant on machines with 32 bit longs,
# and two's complement negation, but shouldn't fail anywhere.
my $a = 2147483647;
my $c=$a++;
cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "postincrement properly upgrades to double");
$a = 2147483647;
$c=++$a;
cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "preincrement properly upgrades to double");
$a = 2147483647;
$a=$a+1;
cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "addition properly upgrades to double");
$a = -2147483648;
$c=$a--;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "postdecrement properly upgrades to double");
$a = -2147483648;
$c=--$a;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "predecrement properly upgrades to double");
$a = -2147483648;
$a=$a-1;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "subtraction properly upgrades to double");
$a = 2147483648;
$a = -$a;
$c=$a--;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
"negation and postdecrement properly upgrade to double");
$a = 2147483648;
$a = -$a;
$c=--$a;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
"negation and predecrement properly upgrade to double");
$a = 2147483648;
$a = -$a;
$a=$a-1;
cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
"negation and subtraction properly upgrade to double");
$a = 2147483648;
$b = -$a;
$c=$b--;
cmp_ok($b, '==', -$a-1, "negation, postdecrement and additional negation");
$a = 2147483648;
$b = -$a;
$c=--$b;
cmp_ok($b, '==', -$a-1, "negation, predecrement and additional negation");
$a = 2147483648;
$b = -$a;
$b=$b-1;
cmp_ok($b, '==', -(++$a),
"negation, subtraction, preincrement and additional negation");
$a = undef;
is($a++, '0', "postinc undef returns '0'");
$a = undef;
is($a--, undef, "postdec undef returns undef");
# Verify that shared hash keys become unshared.
sub check_same {
my ($orig, $suspect) = @_;
my $fail;
while (my ($key, $value) = each %$suspect) {
if (exists $orig->{$key}) {
if ($orig->{$key} ne $value) {
print "# key '$key' was '$orig->{$key}' now '$value'\n";
$fail = 1;
}
} else {
print "# key '$key' is '$orig->{$key}', unexpect.\n";
$fail = 1;
}
}
foreach (keys %$orig) {
next if (exists $suspect->{$_});
print "# key '$_' was '$orig->{$_}' now missing\n";
$fail = 1;
}
ok (!$fail, "original hashes unchanged");
}
my (%orig) = my (%inc) = my (%dec) = my (%postinc) = my (%postdec)
= (1 => 1, ab => "ab");
my %up = (1=>2, ab => 'ac');
my %down = (1=>0, ab => -1);
foreach (keys %inc) {
my $ans = $up{$_};
my $up;
eval {$up = ++$_};
is($up, $ans, "key '$_' incremented correctly");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
}
check_same (\%orig, \%inc);
foreach (keys %dec) {
my $ans = $down{$_};
my $down;
eval {$down = --$_};
is($down, $ans, "key '$_' decremented correctly");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
}
check_same (\%orig, \%dec);
foreach (keys %postinc) {
my $ans = $postinc{$_};
my $up;
eval {$up = $_++};
is($up, $ans, "assignment preceded postincrement");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
}
check_same (\%orig, \%postinc);
foreach (keys %postdec) {
my $ans = $postdec{$_};
my $down;
eval {$down = $_--};
is($down, $ans, "assignment preceded postdecrement");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
}
check_same (\%orig, \%postdec);
{
no warnings 'uninitialized';
my ($x, $y);
eval {
$y ="$x\n";
++$x;
};
cmp_ok($x, '==', 1, "preincrement of previously uninitialized variable");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
my ($p, $q);
eval {
$q ="$p\n";
--$p;
};
cmp_ok($p, '==', -1, "predecrement of previously uninitialized variable");
is($@, '', "no error condition");
}
$a = 2147483648;
$c=--$a;
cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483647, "predecrement properly downgrades from double");
$a = 2147483648;
$c=$a--;
cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483647, "postdecrement properly downgrades from double");
{
use integer;
my $x = 0;
$x++;
cmp_ok($x, '==', 1, "(void) i_postinc");
$x--;
cmp_ok($x, '==', 0, "(void) i_postdec");
}
# I'm sure that there's an IBM format with a 48 bit mantissa
# IEEE doubles have a 53 bit mantissa
# 80 bit long doubles have a 64 bit mantissa
# sparcs have a 112 bit mantissa for their long doubles. Just to be awkward :-)
my $h_uv_max = 1 + (~0 >> 1);
my $found;
for my $n (47..113) {
my $power_of_2 = 2**$n;
my $plus_1 = $power_of_2 + 1;
next if $plus_1 != $power_of_2;
my ($start_p, $start_n);
if ($h_uv_max > $power_of_2 / 2) {
my $uv_max = 1 + 2 * (~0 >> 1);
# UV_MAX is 2**$something - 1, so subtract 1 to get the start value
$start_p = $uv_max - 1;
# whereas IV_MIN is -(2**$something), so subtract 2
$start_n = -$h_uv_max + 2;
print "# Mantissa overflows at 2**$n ($power_of_2)\n";
print "# But max UV ($uv_max) is greater so testing that\n";
} else {
print "# Testing 2**$n ($power_of_2) which overflows the mantissa\n";
$start_p = int($power_of_2 - 2);
$start_n = -$start_p;
my $check = $power_of_2 - 2;
die "Something wrong with our rounding assumptions: $check vs $start_p"
unless $start_p == $check;
}
foreach ([$start_p, '++$i', 'pre-inc', 'inc'],
[$start_p, '$i++', 'post-inc', 'inc'],
[$start_n, '--$i', 'pre-dec', 'dec'],
[$start_n, '$i--', 'post-dec', 'dec']) {
my ($start, $action, $description, $act) = @$_;
my $code = eval << "EOC" or die $@;
sub {
no warnings 'imprecision';
my \$i = \$start;
for(0 .. 3) {
my \$a = $action;
}
}
EOC
warning_is($code, undef, "$description under no warnings 'imprecision'");
$code = eval << "EOC" or die $@;
sub {
use warnings 'imprecision';
my \$i = \$start;
for(0 .. 3) {
my \$a = $action;
}
}
EOC
warnings_like($code, [(qr/Lost precision when ${act}rementing -?\d+/) x 2],
"$description under use warnings 'imprecision'");
}
$found = 1;
last;
}
die "Could not find a value which overflows the mantissa" unless $found;
# these will segfault if they fail
sub PVBM () { 'foo' }
{ my $dummy = index 'foo', PVBM }
isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; $pvbm++ }, undef, "postincrement defined");
isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; $pvbm-- }, undef, "postdecrement defined");
isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; ++$pvbm }, undef, "preincrement defined");
isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; --$pvbm }, undef, "predecrement defined");
# #9466
# don't use pad TARG when the thing you're copying is a ref, or the referent
# won't get freed.
{
package P9466;
my $x;
sub DESTROY { $x = 1 }
for (0..1) {
$x = 0;
my $a = bless {};
my $b = $_ ? $a++ : $a--;
undef $a; undef $b;
::is($x, 1, "9466 case $_");
}
}
$_ = ${qr //};
$_--;
is($_, -1, 'regexp--');
$_ = ${qr //};
$_++;
is($_, 1, 'regexp++');
$_ = v97;
$_++;
isnt(ref\$_, 'VSTRING', '++ flattens vstrings');
done_testing();
|